Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-20 Thread James Galvin
I want to acknowledge that the chairs have seen your request to define the next step. We are reviewing the issue and will propose something as soon as we can. Thanks, Antoin and Jim On 18 Apr 2018, at 13:04, Gould, James wrote: In re-reviewing the mailing list thread, as the document

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-18 Thread Gould, James
In re-reviewing the mailing list thread, as the document shepherd I'm unsure if there is consensus on this. The two items discussed on the list include: 1. Location of the element at the object-level () or at the command-level (). Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-09 moved the from

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-18 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, at 16:19, Gould, James wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, at 15:09, Gould, James wrote: > > I made the proposal for the optional "standard" attribute with the > list > > message > > >

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-16 Thread Gould, James
Patrick, On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, at 15:09, Gould, James wrote: > I made the proposal for the optional "standard" attribute with the list > message > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/7E6X5xCdt3DhqL7p7CFupm9bAAY/?qid=e4f712bc8e70e4d0a458971928924651) > on the

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-13 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, at 15:09, Gould, James wrote: > I made the proposal for the optional "standard" attribute with the list > message > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/7E6X5xCdt3DhqL7p7CFupm9bAAY/?qid=e4f712bc8e70e4d0a458971928924651) > > on the thread with Pat Moroney.

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-13 Thread Gould, James
I made the proposal for the optional "standard" attribute with the list message (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/7E6X5xCdt3DhqL7p7CFupm9bAAY/?qid=e4f712bc8e70e4d0a458971928924651) on the thread with Pat Moroney. The description in the proposal was " Add a new optional “standard”

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11.txt

2018-04-13 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 22:24, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-11 I see that this includes some of my latest comments (but not all of them, for example required attributes still do