Timothy Reaves writes:
> Hello all. I'm using reiserfs on a a SuSE 7.1 machine. I've upgraded
> the kernel to 2.4.5. Seems to work pretty well. I do have some issues.
> When I shutdown, too often there seems to be a problem with unmounting
> the partitions.
>
> Last night
TR>Hello all. I'm using reiserfs on a a SuSE 7.1 machine. I've upgraded
TR> the kernel to 2.4.5. Seems to work pretty well. I do have some issues.
TR> When I shutdown, too often there seems to be a problem with unmounting
TR> the partitions.
TR>Last night, when I shut down,
Hello all. I'm using reiserfs on a a SuSE 7.1 machine. I've upgraded
the kernel to 2.4.5. Seems to work pretty well. I do have some issues.
When I shutdown, too often there seems to be a problem with unmounting
the partitions.
Last night, when I shut down, I got this:
jou
Thank you for the information. I am forwarding this to the list.
Andreas Steinmetz writes:
> Hi,
> just saw your post in the reiserfs list (I'm not subscribed) about LIDS
> compatability.
> I must say that as LIDS works at the VFS layer it works well in combination
> with reiserfs, at least
On Saturday 30 June 2001 20:29, Jens Benecke wrote:
> I just had a, er, 'lively' discussion with someone claiming ReiserFS is
> crap because it hogs even the fastest CPU too much, and it uses 4x as
> much processing power to do metadata operations, and in general is
> slower because of the journal
Hi
Jörg Spilker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here a part of my syslog:
>
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/smtpd[2310]: 1F1101536:
> client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/cleanup[2193]: 1F1101536:
> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin kernel: vs-9020: reiserfs_
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:03:16AM +0200, Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote:
>
> > If the partition used to hold a different filesystem, you should try to
> > run fsck on it, to see what can be recovered. Taking a backup first
> > could be wise. (a backup of the device)
>
> If it was
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 04:42:41AM +0200, Jörg Spilker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here a part of my syslog:
>
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/smtpd[2310]: 1F1101536:
> client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/cleanup[2193]: 1F1101536:
> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
