Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi... I had an Oops under kernel 2.4.9, I believe it is from reiserfs. I was doing ./configure under kdelibs-2.1.1 trying to make and install it when this occured. the kdelibs directory is located in a reiserfs partition. When the oops happens, I can't

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:41:03 +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ./configure again - does it oops? If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump? it does oops, and in the same place, everytime. where is the dump? could it be from bad blocks in the hard disk, it is an

Re: [reiserfs-list] Snapshot with 2.4.9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Gregory Ade wrote: As it is, compiling with a cleaner configuration (minus the cruft) was successful. Hmm... but now I'm running into this same problem again. The way our backup program works, it allows you to run a script

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:41:03 +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ./configure again - does it oops? If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump? it does oops, and in the same place, everytime. where is the dump? Do you see something

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ./configure again - does it oops? If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump? it does oops, and in the same place, everytime. where is the dump? Immediately after the oops (if your system is usable), you could do: dmesg|ksymoops

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:40:09 +0200 (CEST) Rasmus Bøg Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ./configure again - does it oops? If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump? it does oops, and in the same place, everytime. where is the

[reiserfs-list] Segmentation fault with reiserfsprogs-3.x.0k-pre10

It stops with check_objectid_map: map corrupted. Anybody interested in the core dump? What other information can I provide? -Winfried

[reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

On Monday, September 24, 2001 14:46:09 PM -0400 Chris Mason wrote: On Monday, September 24, 2001 10:09:59 PM +0800 Beau Kuiper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all again, I have updated my last set of patches for reiserfs to run on the 2.4.10 kernel. The new set of patches create a

[reiserfs-list] URGENCY: IBM U160 SCSI disk spin-down from time to time

Sorry, that I've cross posted but this is one of the worst cases... First my system spec: Athlon II 1 GHz (0.18µm) MSI MS-6167 Rev 1.0B (AMD Irongate C4, without bypass) 640 MB PC100-2-2-2 SDRAM AHA-2940UW (40 MB/sec) I know it could be to slow, but it should be compatible IBM DDYS-T18350N IBM

Re: [reiserfs-list] URGENCY: IBM U160 SCSI disk spin-down from time to time

All spin-downs occur during heavy dbench (16/32/+ clients) on the same partition (/dev/sda8; the last one). Most likely the drive is overheating and is spinning down/up again to recalibrate itself. you should give it a better cooling ;-) Dirk

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops under 2.4.9

On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:37:41 +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:41:03 +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ./configure again - does it oops? If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump? it

[reiserfs-list] [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

Hi all again, I have updated my last set of patches for reiserfs to run on the 2.4.10 kernel. The new set of patches create a new method to do kupdated syncs. On filesystems that do no support this new method, the regular write_super method is used. Then reiserfs on kupdated super_sync,

Re: [reiserfs-list] [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, butcould still be better

On Monday, September 24, 2001 10:09:59 PM +0800 Beau Kuiper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all again, I have updated my last set of patches for reiserfs to run on the 2.4.10 kernel. The new set of patches create a new method to do kupdated syncs. On filesystems that do no support this

[reiserfs-list] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

Thanks to everyone who has helped me so far, and I look forward to further comments and assistance, Beau Kuiper [EMAIL PROTECTED] And I should attach the patch :-) Sorry about that Beau Kuiper [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- v2.4.10/linux/fs/buffer.c Mon Sep 24 14:04:05 2001 +++ linux/fs/buffer.c

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:15:19AM -0700, Nicholas Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [turning off write-cache] I'm sorry, but that's not acceptable. (I had it turned off for a long time, until I reasoned: real power-outages are very rare, so I can leave it turned on anyways and risk a

[reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Alan Cox wrote: Those drives should be blacklisted and rejected as soon as someone tries to mount those pieces rw. Either the drive can make guarantees when a write to permanent storage has COMPLETED (either by switching off the cache or by a flush operation) or it

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:53:03PM +0200, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linear writing as dd mostly does is BTW something which should never be affected by write caches. A write cache can and will speed up linear writes on typical ide setups. -- -==-

[reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

On Monday 24 September 2001 09:53 am, Matthias Andree wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Nicholas Knight wrote: Turn it off (I have no idea of internals, but I presume it'll still be a write-through cache, so reading back will still be served from the buffer). Do hdparm -W0 /dev/hd[a-h].