Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:59:07PM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: Is this still the infamous NFSD/inode race ? No. This is a bug in journalling code. Something related to improper transaction blocks accounting. Chris said he will try take care of it and rejected my simple, but

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-10-29 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
FYI, This in the log , before the oops : journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big and filer is low on space :o) /dev/sdb1572418604 572341220 77384 100% /storage Should it be because filer hit 0 on space ? Thanks, philippe On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:14:38

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: This in the log , before the oops : journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big Yes, this is the assertion that failed (jlen to be less than TRANS_MAX something). and filer is low on space :o)

[reiserfs-list] [ANNOUNCE]: reiser4

2002-10-29 Thread Nikita Danilov
Hello, Snapshot of reiser4 source code can be found at http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2002.10.29/. It is set of patches against current Linus BK tree (2.5.44). Reiser4 is the next version of ReiserFS file system. It was re-written from the scratch. It supports: - full data journalling with

[reiserfs-list] Re: [ANNOUNCE]: reiser4

2002-10-29 Thread Nikita Danilov
Jeff Garzik writes: Nikita Danilov wrote: Hello, Snapshot of reiser4 source code can be found at http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2002.10.29/. It is set of patches against current Linus BK tree (2.5.44). The current Linus BK tree is quite a bit different from

[reiserfs-list] Quota patches and kinoded versions

2002-10-29 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
Hi Chris, I need to rebuild an up-to-date 2.4 quota aware kernel for Reiserfs 3.6 and i see this difference between what i run now ( 2.4.19-pre6) and the files on your FTP servers: Since march 2002 ( timestamps of my files) , it was kinoded-8-2.4.19-pre3 and i see that kinoded-8-2.4.19-pre7 is

Re: [reiserfs-list] need attrs patch for 2.5.44-ac3

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Vier
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:04:33AM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote: In order for attributes to work you need to mount the volume with -o attrs. Without that you can only get/set attributes value. i'm using the same /etc/fstab with attrs for 2.4 and it works. i haven't tried mounting another reiserfs,

[reiserfs-list] Mounting reiserfs with nonstandard journal size fails

2002-10-29 Thread Torrey Hoffman
I'm having trouble mounting a reiserfs filesystem created with a nonstandard (smaller) journal size. But if I use the default journal size, it works fine. The filesystem is on a 64 MB compact flash attached to a USB reader. It has a single partition, which appears as /dev/sda1. I've done a

Re: [reiserfs-list] [ANNOUNCE]: reiser4

2002-10-29 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:45:52PM +0300, Nikita Danilov wrote: It is still crasheable. Do not put critical data on it. How crashable? I'd like to play around with this on the /home partition on my personal workstation. Is it resiliant enough to be used if I have a cron job make backups every

Re: [reiserfs-list] Behavior of tails with respect to shred, wipe, etc

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Vier
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 08:00:14PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: I guess we should address this issue in reiser4. This is -security- feature after all. Hans? It is not clear how to intehgrate this with journalling though. Zero out all freed blocks (mount option). This will kill write

Re: [reiserfs-list] need attrs patch for 2.5.44-ac3

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:01:30PM -0500, Tom Vier wrote: In order for attributes to work you need to mount the volume with -o attrs. Without that you can only get/set attributes value. i'm using the same /etc/fstab with attrs for 2.4 and it works. i haven't tried mounting another

Re: [reiserfs-list] Behavior of tails with respect to shred, wipe, etc

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:32:17PM -0500, Tom Vier wrote: I guess we should address this issue in reiser4. This is -security- feature after all. Hans? It is not clear how to intehgrate this with journalling though. Zero out all freed blocks (mount option). This will kill write

Re: [reiserfs-list] Behavior of tails with respect to shred, wipe, etc

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Vier
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:36:28AM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:32:17PM -0500, Tom Vier wrote: I guess we should address this issue in reiser4. This is -security- feature after all. Hans? It is not clear how to intehgrate this with journalling though. Zero

Re: [reiserfs-list] Mounting reiserfs with nonstandard journal size fails

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:36:20PM -0800, Torrey Hoffman wrote: I'm having trouble mounting a reiserfs filesystem created with a nonstandard (smaller) journal size. But if I use the default journal size, it works fine. Sure. Non-standard journal is only supported in 2.5 kernel for