well, the segmentation fault was with version 2.6.3 from knoppix CD. After I
kopied
the drive to IDE i used a debian unstable dist to run reiserfsck. I think i
rember the
version was 2.6.8. Here it run without foult but i didn't run it again
against the raid system.
Menawhile I compiled the
Hello all,
I just want to let our developers and testers know, that mkfs and
another reiser4 utility programs has changed their options recently. So,
it is probably needed to update benchmarks, scripts, etc.
For instance, to create reiser4 with short keys you need to type
something like this:
On Aug 06, 2003 18:20 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Question: If it is reading all datablocks, I'm guessing that it is
looking for the magics that build up the filesystem. We're a
datarecovery company. We probably don't have any current
datarecoveries of people with Reiserfs on their disk. But
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:34:10PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote:
El Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:06:37 +0400 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi?:
I don't think ext2 is a serious option for servers of the sort that
Linux specializes in, which is probably why he didn't measure it.
Why?
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 04:30, Grant Miner wrote:
I tested the performace of various filesystems with a mozilla build tree
of 295MB, with primarily writing and copying operations. The test
system is Linux 2.6.0-test2, 512MB memory, 11531.85MB partition for
tests. Sync is run a few times
El Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:08:50 -0700 Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
But with servers, the larger your filesystem, the longer it will take to
fsck. And that is bad for uptime. Period.
Sure. But Han's don't benchmark ext2 because it's not an option isn't
a valid stament, at least to me.
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:31:39PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
getxattr(light_in_time_of_darkness__glad_to_see_you.wav,
system.posix_acl_access
and there it sits waiting for heat-death-of-universe.
Hm, this code is by SuSE people (and it is only in suse kernels) and I
