[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:52:14 EDT, John Richard Moser said:
I thought the DOD algorithm was 7 pass?
Citation please? If you have a better reference than DOD 5220-22.M,
feel free to share it.
To the best of my knowledge, "DOD 7-pass" or similar expressions refer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:52:14 EDT, John Richard Moser said:
|
[...]
blahblahblahblahblah.
Lots of interesting points, but i'm really not interested enough to
comment on them TBH.
Why don't you guys figure out if you want to ha
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:52:14 EDT, John Richard Moser said:
> I thought the DOD algorithm was 7 pass?
Citation please? If you have a better reference than DOD 5220-22.M,
feel free to share it.
> If this is going on rapidly, there's no point in trying to completely
> destroy the disk for *every*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 01:55:19 EDT, John Richard Moser said:
|
[...]
Eh. The gutman algorithm is kind of a toy, but *shrug*
I thought the DOD algorithm was 7 pass?
|
|>Buffering multiple overwrites of the same area and applyin
Title: Amazing
Joke Of The Day
A young man was pulled over by the Mississippi State Police for speeding.
The officer stepped out of his patrol car, adjusted his sunglasses, and
swaggered up to the young man's window. "What chew driving so fas
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 01:55:19 EDT, John Richard Moser said:
> It'd be fun to be able to mount -o remount,erase=gutman / and have the
> gutman algorithm erase everything. It may be interesting to get the
> journal to work around parts of the journal being erased, and to do
> other things in an atte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, the subject sounds silly, but it's needed.
The set of allowable mount options shouldn't change based on the running
kernel configuration. The feature that the option corresponds to may be
unavailable, but it should be sufficient to warn the user th
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = REPROGRAFIA
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Important
Scanning time = 10/8/2004 12:12:34 PM
Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/2.192.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment document.zip contains WORM_MABUTU.A
Markus Törnqvist wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:28:57PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
I have always intended to implement it someday, and to make major
packing locality selectable from userspace, but I have not done so yet.
*cough*cough* online repacker with disk speed and usage analysis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:02:27 +0200
Francesco Biscani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I threw together a patchset to enable reiser4 for the vanilla
> 2.6.9-rc3 kernel. [...]
I did the same some time ago with the last official snapshot
Hello.. I've stumbled upon somthing wierd. and I couldn't see anything on
the mailing-list on this subject...
On a 2.6.8.1 stock kernel booted with ramdisk_size=32000:
# mkreiserfs -f -s 1024 /dev/ram0
mkreiserfs 3.6.11 (2003 www.namesys.com)
A pair of credits:
Alexander Lyamin keeps our har
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 02:49:50PM +0530, Ash wrote:
>For ReiserFS V3 ?
I assumed Hans' point was Reiser4, most of his answers to 3.6
questions are along the lines "see Reiser4"..
--
mjt
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:17:07 +0300, Markus Törnqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:28:57PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> >I have always intended to implement it someday, and to make major
> >packing locality selectable from userspace, but I have not done so yet.
>
> *coug
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:28:57PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
>I have always intended to implement it someday, and to make major
>packing locality selectable from userspace, but I have not done so yet.
*cough*cough* online repacker with disk speed and usage analysis *cough*
;)
--
mjt
14 matches
Mail list logo
