Le mar 08 fév 2005 14:16:43 CET, Vladimir Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit
:
You can try to make reiserfs to not free inode numbers of removed
files with the attached patch and check whether it helps. It decreases
number of files which can be created on a filesystem to ~2^^32.
I am
Le mar 08 fév 2005 14:14:08 CET, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Chris Mason wrote:
1) put everything on lvm and backup snapshots instead of the live
filesystem. This has a number of benefits.
I recommend this one.
Yes, my favorite too. And since my first message, I learned that
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote:
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file. He normally works with windoze. Therefore he
didn't know he couldn't undelete a file on a reiserfs partition with ext2
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote:
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file. He normally works with windoze. Therefore he
didn't know he couldn't
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:05, Oleg O. Ossovitskii wrote:
Hello!
I run self compiled kernel 2.4.27 w/devfs and want to upgrade to
2.6.10 w/devfs. All kernels without using initrd
/dev/hdc2 - /boot - ext2
/dev/hdc8 - / - ReiserFS V3
gcc 3.4.3, modultils-2.4.21, glibc-2.3.4
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 10:34, you wrote:
Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote:
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file.
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:04, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote:
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file. He
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 14:56, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 10:34, you wrote:
Sorry, but what does df -T say?
Does it say that reiserfs filesystem is mounted on /mnt/temp1?
No, it replied:
# /dev/loop/0 ext26952927620 65997368 1%
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Oleg O. Ossovitskii wrote:
Hello!
I run self compiled kernel 2.4.27 w/devfs and want to upgrade to
2.6.10 w/devfs. All kernels without using initrd
/dev/hdc2 - /boot - ext2
/dev/hdc8 - / - ReiserFS V3
gcc 3.4.3, modultils-2.4.21,
Hello, Alex!
Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 4:44:46 PM, you wrote:
# For booting GNU/Linux
title GNU/Linux-2.6.x
kernel (hd0,1)/vmlinuz root=/dev/hdc8 rw devfs=mount
title GNU/Linux-2.4.x
kernel (hd0,1)/vmlinuz-2.4 root=/dev/hdc8 rw
And the fsck.reiser4 --build-fs is done
Is there anything further I could provide to help in gleaning usefulness
from this data?
Thanks,
Nicolas Smallwood
* fsck.reiser4 started at Wed Feb 2 04:04:20 2005
Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/sdc1.
Master super block (16):
magic:
In an interesting twist:
I just mounted the filesystem after running --build-fs.
It seems to mount just fine, but dmesg reports the following error:
Warning, mounting filesystem with fatal errors, forcing read-only mount
I unmounted the drive and tried again, with the same error. What is
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:09:24PM +0200, Oleg O. Ossovitskii wrote:
Hello, Alex!
Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 4:44:46 PM, you wrote:
# For booting GNU/Linux
title GNU/Linux-2.6.x
kernel (hd0,1)/vmlinuz root=/dev/hdc8 rw devfs=mount
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject = warning
Scanning time = 2/9/2005 11:30:08 AM
Engine/Pattern = 7.500-1001/2.398.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment disco.zip contains
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject = warning
Scanning time = 2/9/2005 9:40:58 AM
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002/2.398.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment disco.zip contains
Hi All -
I am new to the list - I have been using Reiser4 on Linux/Alpha
for several months now and like very much what it offers.
(I use a -mm kernel from kernel.org with a Debian distro)
Recently I became aware or a large number or alignment fixups
occurring in the kernel, specifically in
hello,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:59:17PM -0500, Tom Evans wrote:
Hi All -
I am new to the list - I have been using Reiser4 on Linux/Alpha
for several months now and like very much what it offers.
(I use a -mm kernel from kernel.org with a Debian distro)
Recently I became aware or a
How can I be taken off of this list?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
Douglas Wicks, Ph.D.
CCBill, Cavecreek Director of Sales
888-906-0666 x154 office
480-449-8811 direct line
icq # 68622974
www.ccbill.com www.cavecreek.com www.drmnetworks.com
-Original
I attached a patch that fixes a few typos in reiser4progs 1.0.3.
Best regards, Peter.
diff -burN reiser4progs-1.0.3/INSTALL_README
reiser4progs-1.0.3.patch/INSTALL_README
--- reiser4progs-1.0.3/INSTALL_README 2003-12-29 23:16:42.0 +0100
+++ reiser4progs-1.0.3.patch/INSTALL_README
Hello all.
I am new to the list so please have patience with me for maybe asking obvious
questions.
I tried a recovery as described in the manpages;
talen:~ # reiserfsck --rebuild-tree -S /dev/hdc1
--logfile /root/reisercheck.logfile
It ran as excpected (i hope) right up until the end where
Thanks for the patch the helped with the vast majority of the fixups.
Now there are just a trickle occurring in various places - would it be helpful
for me to track them down, or are there folks who are already pursuing this?
...tom
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 01:19 pm, Alex Zarochentsev
Hello
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 07:35, Rikard Johnels wrote:
Hello all.
I am new to the list so please have patience with me for maybe asking obvious
questions.
I tried a recovery as described in the manpages;
talen:~ # reiserfsck --rebuild-tree -S /dev/hdc1
--logfile
Hello, Vladimir!
9 feb 2005 ., 14:53:59, You wrote:
VS Please send both complete .config-s.
VS .config-2.6.10 has
VS # CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set
VS whereas .config-2.4.27 has
VS CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT=y
VS If you turned CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT on for 2.6.10 - would it change
VS anything?
I
Hello, Alex!
Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 5:56:26 PM, you wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device hdc8 or unknown-block(0,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
AZ please make sure that the rootfs
On Thursday 10 February 2005 07.26, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 07:35, Rikard Johnels wrote:
Hello all.
I am new to the list so please have patience with me for maybe asking
obvious questions.
I tried a recovery as described in the manpages;
talen:~ #
Rikard Johnels wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 07.26, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 07:35, Rikard Johnels wrote:
Hello all.
I am new to the list so please have patience with me for maybe asking
obvious questions.
I tried a recovery as described in the manpages;
26 matches
Mail list logo
