On Monday July 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, still haven't heard much discussion of metafs vs file-as-directory,
but it seems like it'd be easier in metafs.
Why not implement it inside the directory
Neil Brown wrote:
Maybe it is worth repeating Al Viro's suggestion at this point. I
don't have a reference but the idea was basically that if you open
/foo and get filedescriptor N, then
/proc/self/fds/N-meta
is a directory which contains all the meta stuff for /foo.
Then it is trivial to
The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes
different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable
for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it
is time to reformat the code to conform to the Linux style
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 23:42, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
The ReiserFS code is a mix of a number of different coding styles, sometimes
different even from line-to-line. Since the code has been relatively stable
for quite some time and there are few outstanding patches to be applied, it
is time to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday July 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, still haven't heard much discussion of metafs vs file-as-directory,
but it seems like it'd be easier in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
Horst von Brand wrote:
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
I think ... and .meta both serve as a logical delimiter. However
some programs implement their own ... which would make it clash
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against
fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h.
That can't be true. It isn't actually following the Lindent rules. It has
that braindamaged put the type on a separate line thing for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
This patch contains the result of running scripts/Lindent against
fs/reiserfs/*.c and include/linux/reiserfs_*.h.
That can't be true. It isn't actually following the Lindent rules.
indent(1) doesn't know how to handle the do not compile error. It results
in the item_ops array declaration being indented a tab stop in when it should
not be. This patch replaces it with a #error that describes why it's failing.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ruNpX
The attached script runs scripts/Lindent against fs/reiserfs.c and
include/linux/reiserfs_*.h
It's a quick one-liner consisting of:
scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SuSE Labs
reiserfs-lindent.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
David Masover wrote:
That's why we're trying to find something that people won't actually
touch, especially since if we design it right, this will be the last
delimiter introduced at the fs/vfs level.
Uh, no, there needs to be about a dozen or so more.
But not this year.
On Tuesday July 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it is worth repeating Al Viro's suggestion at this point. I
don't have a reference but the idea was basically that if you open
/foo and get filedescriptor N, then
/proc/self/fds/N-meta
How am I supposed to get there with a shell
On Tuesday July 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
Maybe it is worth repeating Al Viro's suggestion at this point. I
don't have a reference but the idea was basically that if you open
/foo and get filedescriptor N, then
/proc/self/fds/N-meta
is a directory which
Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday July 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
Maybe it is worth repeating Al Viro's suggestion at this point. I
don't have a reference but the idea was basically that if you open
/foo and get filedescriptor N, then
/proc/self/fds/N-meta
is a
David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
Horst von Brand wrote:
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
[...]
Better to spend one's mind looking for bugs instead of this issue.
.if bugs were seen as such a big deal.
I think it's far
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
That's why we're trying to find something that people won't actually
touch, especially since if we design it right, this will be the last
delimiter introduced at the fs/vfs level.
Uh, no, there needs to be about a dozen or so more.
Where?
From
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h
Ok, applied. You should check that you got the same results I did, and
feel free to send further cleanup patches. Sometimes indent does some
silly things.
Linus
17 matches
Mail list logo
