Re: File as a directory - back to predicates

2005-08-23 Thread Leo Comerford
Firstly, I apologise for the absurdly late reply! Secondly, I'm going to backtrack for a bit here. Let's forget about relations for the moment, and concentrate solely on single-place predicates. I also apologise for (partly) repeating myself at length like this, but this time I have what I hope is

Re: Basic interface for key management in reiser4 (DRAFT)

2005-08-23 Thread Hans Reiser
Edward Shishkin wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > >> Edward Shishkin wrote: >> >> >> When you load a key, who can access the file? Only the person who loaded it, yes or? >>> >>> Currently standard unix permissions work here. >>> >> >> >> but the idea is to use keys

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Pierre Etchemaïté
Le Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:39:15 +0200, Clemens Eisserer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi there, > > I am currently tinkering a idn-router which a harddrive which should > mostly be in stand-by. > However it seems the drive is rather unimpressed by a 5s timeout > setting specified with hdparm and

Re: Strange problems/bugs with reiserfs and reiserfschk

2005-08-23 Thread Konstantin Münning
Hi Vitaly! Thank you for the reiserfsck 3.9.20. It in fact had different results on that drive. I had it run in gdb (as I did with 3.6.19 to see what/where the trouble may be) and the result is: (***snip***) vpf-10680: The file [641222 641239] has the wrong block count in the StatData (1528) - c

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi Christian, > Are you sure? Common "knowledge" (empiric and anecdotal evidence) says that a > spin-up/spin-down cycle costs significantly more "lifetime" than running the > drive for the same amount of time. You really have to have extremely few > spin-ups for this to have any positive effect, I

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Christian Iversen
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 17:51, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi David, > > > So, the simplest way is to do "-a noatime", unless you really need the > > atime updates. It'll boost your performance, too... > > Wow! To be honest I was a bit skeptic wether would work but like magic > ... the drive goes

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread David Masover
Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi David, >>Nor Gentoo, but I use it there anyway. > > Well I plan to switch to Gentoo soon - do you know any tutorials how > to install Gentoo on Reiser4? Someone made a reiser4/amd64 livecd somewhere. Not sure if there's a good one with straight reiser4/x86. But, if

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi David, > So, the simplest way is to do "-a noatime", unless you really need the > atime updates. It'll boost your performance, too... Wow! To be honest I was a bit skeptic wether would work but like magic ... the drive goes into standby and wakes only up if something really needs disk access

Re: Basic interface for key management in reiser4 (DRAFT)

2005-08-23 Thread Edward Shishkin
Hans Reiser wrote: Edward Shishkin wrote: When you load a key, who can access the file? Only the person who loaded it, yes or? Currently standard unix permissions work here. but the idea is to use keys instead of standard unix permissions I think you need to store key

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread David Masover
Clemens Eisserer wrote: Hello David and thanks a lot for answering my question. Have you tried "-o noatime"? Why do you think this could help? Since the machine does absolutly nothing (no services, simply nothing than a open bash). I remember someone explaining this before. It went some

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Jonathan Briggs
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:39 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi there, > > I am currently tinkering a idn-router which a harddrive which should > mostly be in stand-by. > However it seems the drive is rather unimpressed by a 5s timeout > setting specified with hdparm and goes in standby very seldo

Your message to Gimp-developer awaits moderator approval

2005-08-23 Thread gimp-developer-bounces
Your mail to 'Gimp-developer' with the subject Delivery reports about your e-mail Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receiv

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hello David and thanks a lot for answering my question. > Have you tried "-o noatime"? Why do you think this could help? Since the machine does absolutly nothing (no services, simply nothing than a open bash). > Also, Reiser4 is much more standby-friendly. If you've got the RAM, it > won't tou

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread David Masover
Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi there, > > I am currently tinkering a idn-router which a harddrive which should > mostly be in stand-by. > However it seems the drive is rather unimpressed by a 5s timeout > setting specified with hdparm and goes in standby very seldom although > the computer is runnig

Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

2005-08-23 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi there, I am currently tinkering a idn-router which a harddrive which should mostly be in stand-by. However it seems the drive is rather unimpressed by a 5s timeout setting specified with hdparm and goes in standby very seldom although the computer is runnig 100% idle (even no isdn-services star

Re: Odd llseek semantics on directories

2005-08-23 Thread Vladimir V. Saveliev
Hello Charles P. Wright wrote: > Vladimir, > > We actually came across this while working on Unionfs in the kernel, > which uses lseek to inquire about directory positions and then resume > directory reading operations (much like nfsd does). > Ok, please try whether the attached patch makes rei

Re: is quota functional in 2.6.12.3 ?

2005-08-23 Thread Jan Kara
Hello, > I tried to use quota with ReiserFS and a stock kernel 2.6.12.3. > > Everything seems to work fine, except that it doesn't work : the user can use > as much space he wants ! However the repquota seems OK. > > Any idea ? You probably forgot to turn quotas on using quotaon(8) command.

Re: Two possible bugs in V3 ReiserFS and 2.4.31 kernel??

2005-08-23 Thread Vladimir V. Saveliev
Hello Cris Rhea wrote: > Background: > > Dell 6600 (4 processor, 8GB memory) with RHAS3 loaded. > Email product vendor suggests using ReiserFS V3 on mail spool directory > for speed (many files in one directory). > > Since RedHat does not support/include ReiserFS in their kernels, download > and