Hi everyone,
I got this half an hour ago, with some processes left in D state, namely
ooffice.bin and two instances of procmail, as this happened on my /home
LV:
kernel BUG at
/usr/src/sources/linux-2.6.16-rc5/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:29!
invalid opcode: [#1]
PREEMPT
Module
Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>> Instead of answering your questions as asked, let me explain what it
>> does.
>>
>> It encrypts the file data. It makes some effort at avoiding
>> watermarking attacks by use of an initialization vector, but this effort
>> is not robust in that fil
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>>AFAIK, the most recent reason why reiser4 does not get included is that
>>reiser4 developers have to change reiser4 to use generic code to
>>implement read/write.
>>AFAICS, reiser4 developers do not work on that.
>>
>>
>Has this really become a reason to not include r
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:35, Alain Knaff wrote:
> Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > Hi Alain,
> >
> > the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains
> > some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result.
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
Hi Alain,
the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains
some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result.
Thank you.
Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as shipped by
SuSE 9.3. and 10.0.).
Later, I downloaded 3.6.19 from namesys,
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 21:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (sorry for multiple posts)
>
> After a crash my reiserfs partition behaved strangely (space usage 100%,
> root wasn't allowed to see some files or write into some directories,
> and some error messages when accessing files).
> fsck.
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:51, Alain Knaff wrote:
> We have a corrupted reiserfs filesystem here which can't even be repaired
> with
> --rebuid-tree.
>
> The error messages happens at pass 3a:
>
>
> Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files):
> ### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) #
> Looking
(sorry for multiple posts)
After a crash my reiserfs partition behaved strangely (space usage 100%, root
wasn't allowed to see some files or write into some directories, and some error
messages when accessing files).
fsck.reiserfs found errors which it said must be corrected with --rebuild-tre
We have a corrupted reiserfs filesystem here which can't even be repaired with
--rebuid-tree.
The error messages happens at pass 3a:
Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files):
### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) #
Looking for lost directories:
lost+found.c 116 _look_for_lost
not directory fou
> AFAIK, the most recent reason why reiser4 does not get included is that
> reiser4 developers have to change reiser4 to use generic code to
> implement read/write.
> AFAICS, reiser4 developers do not work on that.
Has this really become a reason to not include reiser4 into mainline?
I also don't s
Hans Reiser wrote:
Instead of answering your questions as asked, let me explain what it does.
It encrypts the file data. It makes some effort at avoiding
watermarking attacks by use of an initialization vector, but this effort
is not robust in that file size is not encryptable without an
unacc
Hello
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 02:41 -0800, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just saw a thread on the LKML a minute ago asking about the state of
> getting the patch into vanilla linux. I read Andrew Morton's post
> about a month ago stating that it could happen soon, but was unlikely
> due to th
Hello,
I just saw a thread on the LKML a minute ago asking about the state of
getting the patch into vanilla linux. I read Andrew Morton's post
about a month ago stating that it could happen soon, but was unlikely
due to there not actually being a need for it to go into mainline (no
major distro d
13 matches
Mail list logo
