Tyler Phelps wrote (ao):
Package: reiserfsprogs
Version: 1:3.6.17-2
Can you try a newer version?
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.19.tar.gz
According to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11423516088r=1w=2
3.6.20 also exist, but I cant find it.
Good luck,
My questions (and all of the diagnostic information provided) revolve
around a specific process of reiserfsck, using the version that I
specified, which is still running. The only way that I can try a new
version is to abort the current fsck operation... doing that
essentially invalidates
Hi,
it is known problem. Fixed in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2
(reiser4-have-get_exclusive_access-restart-transaction.patch).
as i've been burned by this bug, too i would suggest making a new patch
for 2.6.16 including
reiser4-have-get_exclusive_access-restart-transaction.patch
or at least put a warning
Hello
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 13:34 -0500, Dan Sheffner wrote:
Hello All,
I'm trying to find out the number of files that reiserfs can support
in a single folder. I know that you web site says about 1.2 million
files without collision, but I have written a small program to create
files
On 4/10/06, Alexander Zarochentsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 09:28, Matt Eaton wrote:
I was running OpenOffice and tried saving a file.
I'm using 2.6.16.1 + reiser4-for-2.6.16-1.patch.gz
(Please help! I'm having to run openoffice on a different filesystem
as
The patch posted works for me. I would concur with Michael on this one.
For some reason openoffice triggered it with my problem. This is a bad
area to have data loss and I imagine I wouldn't be the first to lose a
document from this bug. It doesn't leave an inconsistent filesystem,
but it does
Hello
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 01:12 -0700, Tyler Phelps wrote:
My questions (and all of the diagnostic information provided) revolve
around a specific process of reiserfsck, using the version that I
specified, which is still running. The only way that I can try a new
version is to abort
Hi!
I had the same problem about a year ago with a 0.8TB drive, you may
check some list archives for the details.
The solution was a patch to the reiserfsprogs which was then
incorporated in version 3.6.19. I am not familiar with the details as I
only supplied the information and Vladimir did
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 12:54, Avuton Olrich wrote:
On 4/10/06, Alexander Zarochentsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 09:28, Matt Eaton wrote:
I was running OpenOffice and tried saving a file.
I'm using 2.6.16.1 + reiser4-for-2.6.16-1.patch.gz
(Please help!
On 11 Apr 2006 13:24, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend you to abort it and try
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp/reiserfsprogs-3.6.20.tar.gz
Why is it in /pub/tmp? Is this an official new version?
This version compiles with no Problems on Debian 3.1 with gcc 3.3.5,
Hello
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 16:34 +0200, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
On 11 Apr 2006 13:24, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend you to abort it and try
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp/reiserfsprogs-3.6.20.tar.gz
Why is it in /pub/tmp? Is this an official new
Hi,
On 11 Apr 2006 19:23, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would you try if this patch helps, please?
--- ./utils/debugfs/corruption.c~ 2006-03-28 16:40:23.0 +0400
+++ ./utils/debugfs/corruption.c 2006-04-11 19:21:39.0 +0400
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@
The patch worked flawlessly. Thanks.
It is reassuring to know I do not have to go out and buy a new hard drive.
Kelvie
On 4/10/06, Alexander Zarochentsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 03 April 2006 09:31, Kelvie Wong wrote:
Attached is the relevant dmesg output; I have ran
13 matches
Mail list logo
