Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

2005-09-19 Thread Bill Davidsen
, unless someone is willing to make the argument that the code is too weird to maintain, style isn't an issue, is it? Christoph has made some clear technical points, those should be addressed, whether you like the code style or not. -- -bill davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The secret

Re: 2.6.9-mm1

2004-10-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
experiences. I do think that akpm is capable of deciding when it should go in without all this politicing, and I doubt he or Linus care if it makes a vendor kernel first, considering all the things in vendor kernels which NEVER get to mainline. -- -bill davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 2.6.9-mm1

2004-10-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
them where average users don't see them (or dumping them completely). Interface clutter has a cost. We already have a section of odd things a user might want to do on a small, embedded, or special use. That might be a good place to put it. -- -bill davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The secret

Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
devices this is important. The leveling seems to be done by JFFs2 in a portable way, and that's as it should be. If the leveling were in the driver I don't believe even FAT would work. -- bill davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers