On Thursday 26 August 2004 20:17, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Because without kernel support there is no way someone can
publish a new metadata type and have it automatically supported
by all application data files (ie. most apps ignore it, and only
apps
On Thursday 26 August 2004 22:10, Rik van Riel wrote:
Do we really want to have a file paradigm that's different
from the other OSes out there ?
What happens when users want to transfer data from Linux
to another system ?
I think it depends on the transport being used: some transports could
On Thursday 26 August 2004 23:05, David Lang wrote:
I also don't see why the VFS/Filesystem can't decide that (for example)
this tar.gz is so active that instead of storing it as a tar.gz and
providing a virtual directory of the contents that it instead stores the
directory of the contents
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 18:15, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
Another reiser4 snapshot was released today. This time it is against
2.6.0-test5.
Please take note that DISK DORMAT IS CHANGED, so you need to recreate
your reiser4 filesystems (if you have any). This involves getting new
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 08:03, Yury Umanets wrote:
Information: Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/sda5.
(Yes/No): Yes
Creating reiser4 on /dev/sda5...
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to 0x600242f2, ip=0x200f7661
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 04:30, Grant Miner wrote:
I tested the performace of various filesystems with a mozilla build tree
of 295MB, with primarily writing and copying operations. The test
system is Linux 2.6.0-test2, 512MB memory, 11531.85MB partition for
tests. Sync is run a few times
