h, 2.6.17-2.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:52:27 +0100
Jure Pečar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Recently I upgraded my home server. I moved EVMS volumes from 3ware hw
> mirrors (lvm2) to a md raid1 (lvm2) and am now getting lots of these
> errors, which result in Inp
this is a problem affecting many users.
I run my busy mailservers with 0.5-2% free space (that's still a couple of
gigabytes) and have no problems. It's true that I haven't touched the kernel &
reiserfs there (2.4.21), so it does not have any additions to the reiserfs v3
which looks like it was made
specifficaly for Sun and doesn't work with the existing driver. I'm hacking it
in my spare time and I hope I can get it working...
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org
-delete test ... is my conlcusion
right that tree based disk organisation takes its toll here and makes it look
10 times slower than ext2?
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org/
er4 is on a good way to
decrease this cost by spending some more cpu ticks, but because I need
a solution "yesterday" (welcome to the real world ... or how they
say:), I'm lookig for a more traditional approach, ssd journal.
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org
mething like this in production? How well does it work?
Jeff, are your pathces already in the Linus tree or do I have to use
some -mm or Suse kernel?
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:44:00 +0300 (EEST)
"Ivan Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk
> errors.
>
> The test is simple:
> format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd
> if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=1
