On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:50:27AM -0400, Douglas McNaught wrote:
I'll just note that the applications bundled as directories stuff on
MacOS/NextStep is done completely in userspace--as far as the kernel
is concerned, Mail.app is a regular directory. The file manager
handles recognition and
Hi guys!
Now that I moved along to AMD64 and still have my home directory
as Reiser4, I have a big incentive to get this baby stable on Reiser4.
What bugs can I help to reproduce? What test cases are there?
Let's make this work, shall we :)
--
mjt
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 03:03:49PM +0100, Sander Sweers wrote:
I will get an AMD64 soon (hopefully this year) and will run 64bit
Gentoo on it. How has it been running overall, is it workable and not
For the record, Ubuntu Warty/Universe here with some random stuff
pulled from Hoary.
crashing
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:54:08PM -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
Have there been any reports other than Isaac's of reiser4 working on
AMD64? It still doesn't work for me, and I'd like to know if I'm the
only one having problems.
I recently purchased an AMD64 setup.
Here's the catch; I did so
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:43:49PM +0100, Piotr Neuman wrote:
Regards to all reiser developers for great work.
And to you, sikkhmeister :)
(Just applied the patch, I'll let you know how it goes :)
ps. At the moment software suspend 2 is not included (I'm too lazy and,
swsusp2 is usually most
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:57:27AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
www.namesys.com/future_vision.html
404.
http://www.namesys.com/whitepaper.html
--
mjt
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:48:13PM -, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Am I completely loosing it ?
Using 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 allows me to go into a file as a directory when
the file has the executable flag...that shouldn't be happening, should
it?
Is this a sign that files-as-dirs are seen stable
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:40:08AM -, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Forgive my short-sightedness in this respect, but where's the benefit in this
approach?:)
This is one of those shitfests that I really don't want to touch.
It's an approach that has a lot of potential but there's not much
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:19:57AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
For the case Peter cites, yes, it does add clutter to the pathname to
say ..metas (actually, it is now in the current reiser4, not
..metas). This is because you aren't looking for metafile
shound like something that could
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:19:19PM +1100, Cal wrote:
This occurs with 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, 2.6.10-rc2-mm3. It's nastier than
you might think. After the BUG, the system slowly sinks into fatal
decline, losing screen i/o, keyboard response, eventually just
locking up completely.
Did you try vs's
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:42:12PM +1100, Cal wrote:
While I search for the link to said patches, can you point me to
them?
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfsm=110121057720746w=2
It is possible the posted patch is included in the second
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:23:43PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
I don't remember if I mentioned it, but there were two patches
from Piotr Neuman's -cko that were required by Reiser4 (according
to him) but seemed to patch well onto vs's patched system...
Can anyone give any info on this?
Mr
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:00:59AM +1100, Cal wrote:
Both of those patches appear to be from the mm series. They're in
2.6.10-rc2-mm2 and 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 (at least), and have generous
comments at their head regarding their purpose.
OK, I admit I didn't read through them :)
But they don't seem
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:14:44AM +1100, Cal wrote:
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9da81): In function `mask_ok_common':
: undefined reference to `vfs_permission'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.9-cko4a'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
Have a look
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:42:25AM +1100, Cal wrote:
I also edited as said above and kicked in a new compile...
Yeah, me too.
Which I'm still waiting for ;)
With the amount of work these guys are putting into it all, I wouldn't
dare to suggest what's warranted. I'm content to fiddle about,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:11:21AM +0100, Dirk Steinberg wrote:
How about making metas a mount option? Right now disabling metas
requires patching the source.
Isn't there -o nopseudo already?
--
mjt
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 02:47:19PM +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
The attached should fix a problem #01.
Thank you!
It did, well, at least I tried it once and it did :)
I'm recompiling now without as much debug in it.
I also checked with patch --dry-run that it would apply on
-rc2-mm2, is it
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 06:00:52PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
It did, well, at least I tried it once and it did :)
Uhh-uh, well, there were problems; some dead dpkg processes...
So there seems to be something I'm not getting.
I'm afraid I didn't take up the notices about the files having
I'm setting the Cc to the list, these questions may be relevant
to other people with the same issues and I think they should probably
reply as well :)
I do an apt-get source --build crystalspace (but some others
on the list said they used apt-get update, which I haven't tested)
Anyway, zam said
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 06:59:02PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
Nov 21 21:45:11 shrike kernel: kernel BUG at
fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:58!
http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/2004.11.22.forensics/
The first two files are from something vs sent me.
As it says on the bottom, I couldn't
Hi!
I got weirdass segfaults and hangs, so I thought I'd reboot the all-debug
version of -cko3 I have around. However, I saw the following:
(Reiser4 for 2.6.9 as merged by Piotr Neuman, afaik)
Nov 21 17:55:23 shrike -- MARK --
Nov 21 18:07:13 shrike kernel:
Nov 21 18:07:14 shrike kernel:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
Nov 21 18:27:31 shrike kernel: 1Unable to handle kernel paging request at
virtual address cf607e50
Nov 21 18:27:31 shrike kernel: printing eip:
Just for the record, seems to be totally reproducible; This time I didn't
get any
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:20:31PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
Just for the record, seems to be totally reproducible; This time I didn't
get any info out of it before it totally locked.
I fired up 2.6.10-rc2-mm2 for shits and giggles and see what I got:
Nov 21 21:45:11 shrike kernel
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0800, BLuEGoD wrote:
Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there
is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm
patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with
Apart from my
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 02:04:55PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
Nov 13 13:38:21 shrike kernel: reiser4 panicked cowardly: assertion failed:
!memcmp(inode-u.generic_ip, sd-body, (size_t) length + 1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/vlc$ sudo apt-get source --build vlc
...
E: Method http has died
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:16:46AM -0500, Jeremy West wrote:
So ... it seems to me that reiser4 is having some issues handling
segfault events. I'm not sure how to tell what caused the segfault.
I don't think it's memory, because it happens in the same spot of the
build every time. I've done
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:53:41PM -0500, Jeremy West wrote:
Funny thing is I did what you suggested, enabling all the debugging,
but it still freezes. Not immediately, but it still hangs. First I
get a segfault on any command I type into the console. After 10 secs
or so of this, It will freeze
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Jeremy West wrote:
Ok. I wouldn't call myself a linux newbie by any means. However,
I've never had to do console logging or network logging. Are there
some good docs somewhere on how to set this up?
Network logging is well-documented in the kernel
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:49:52PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
Assuming I'd let it finish. I didn't, so I have absolutely no idea how
far along it was. I suspect that it wasn't going to finish.
AFAICT there is no way to see where the repacker is going :P
--
mjt
Hans Reiser wrote:
Please make large keys the default, and hide the ability to
choose small keys by taking it out of the configuration menu and burying
it in a .h file.
Stupid question, why have small keys at all?
Someone said once that he didn't want to use large keys because they added
no
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:45:10PM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Could someone please forward this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for unknown
reasons I can not send anything to some addresses).
Forwarded.
--
mjt
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Piotr Neuman wrote:
This patch allows reading of repacker stats while it is working. It creates
two files in repacker sysfs hierarchy: formatted_nodes and unformatted_nodes,
which correspond to the stats that repacker prints after it has finished.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 06:17:40PM +0200, Piotr Neuman wrote:
My stat tool is based on Markus Törnqvist code. It prints out repacker speed
and total work accomplished along with average values at exit. Download:
http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/reiser4_repacker_stats.py
I did a little something
Hi!
I'm using 2.6.8.1-cko8 happily, but noticed that the repacker is slow.
A bit suspiciously slow.
Is it possible to get something like /proc/mdstat to describe what
the repacker is doing?
IMO that would be great..
Thanks!
--
mjt
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 02:49:50PM +0530, Ash wrote:
For ReiserFS V3 ?
I assumed Hans' point was Reiser4, most of his answers to 3.6
questions are along the lines see Reiser4..
--
mjt
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 01:42:42AM +0800, Will Smith wrote:
As far as I can tell (can anybody confirm/deny), it's up to userspace
to manually toggle the 'direction' flag as required before starting
the repacker - the direction seems to default to 0 ('backward') on each
mount.
Sure seems that
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:05:17PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
Reiserfs list, and I don't think there was much consensus that came out
It's like Gentoo users and patch sets ;)
of it. Currently for Reiser4, AFAIK, the metas name is a compile-time
option that you can change by changing a #define,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 02:59:29PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
P.S. I imagine, how much flamed it would be if reiser4 made any intensive
changes in linux VFS code...
Surely it would be flamefest galore, but thanks to Reiser4 there may be
some VFS changes to that direction, maybe completely
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:35:32AM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
Question: Is cat /foo/bar/baz.tar.gz/metas the attribute
directory or a directory in the tarball named metas?
This has been fought over on the reiserfs-list ad nauseaum, but
it's a valid point.
That's why I tend to rename
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:57:26PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 16:50, Christophe Saout wrote:
are read-only and system-wide and the user-overridden changes. I don't
know if all of these things would really make sense inside the kernel.
True. FWIW, I never use most of those
Hi
I set up a symlink /var/log - /boot/log where /boot is a reiserfs
system. That was because Reiser4 lost log data when we were chasing the
last bug with VS.
Now the partition grew full and it was shown by my computer completely
locking up. Out of the blue. At least that's what I assume caused
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 07:43:41AM +0200, Dan Nilsson wrote:
After running the test I fsck:ed to remove the corruptions, then proceeded by
removed my /usr/portage tree (where corruptions seem to easily occur) and
reinstalled all the files (with rsync). The same type of corruption occured
but
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:56:34PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Don't use te unfsd except for special reasons. If you want to test a userspace
daemon just use unfs3 (unfs3.sf.net).
I may have given the wrong impression here, I am still trying to use
knfsd here, I just tried the userspace one
Hi!
I've been trying, quite desperately, to get FAI working but there appears
to be some bad karma.
The server exports /usr/local/share/fai with async,rw and
/usr/lib/fai/nfsroot with async,rw,no_root_squash
Originally I had ro, but that did not seem to matter.
I get to the point where the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:16:12PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
So, the problen cannot be fully solved. However, you can re-create all second
level sub-directories and assign another fibration plugins to them.
I've never gotten a real reply this question...
Will it be possible in the future
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:43:33PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
I think only empty directory can be refibrated.
Are you thinking about implementing it/is it a matter of time and money?
Reiser4 provides plugin mechanism. Everyone is encouraged to write plugins.
Aren't those two sentences a
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:00:04PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
simply changes id of fibration plugin associated with foo. Doing this
on non-empty foo would result in corruption and hence is
disabled. Vladimir, as far as I can tell, meant that if one writes
And on a file it would do nothing, I
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:46:03PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
But you may remember what happened when I last tried to touch Reiser4
code and VFS ;)
Sorry, i do not. What was it?
Nikita gave me the theory on how to access metas/ on read-only files
by hacking a new attribute into VFS.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:44:59AM +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
Meucci open the file for copyright before Bell, but seems it is
necessary to renew each year.
Copyrights are not filed, patents are.
Are you sure you're not mistaken in words here?
Therefore, he don't renew.
How stupid
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
Yes. is the patent, not the copyright.
He don't have the money to pay the renew the patent.
That sucks then.
Maybe he should have had someone market and promote it better, maybe
he would not have needed a patent at all,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:04:47PM +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
People have the same ideas independently, person A and person B.
Person A patents it and person B can't compete with person A.
Person A makes a bad implementation and no one can do anything about it,
no one can do it better.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:43:13AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
I may be completely wrong legally, esp. in Russia. I personally think
it should belong to the original author if the original copyright is
still valid.
Of course it belongs to the original author.
But the translation is the
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Chris Dukes wrote:
Otherwise harry potter can get translated and no need to pay rowling.
Not entirely. Such a translation would be deemed a derivative work.
The copyright on the translated version belongs to the translator
(Unless the translator did it
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:47:35AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
I don't understand why Vitaly cannot do one of the things suggested on
this thread: create an fsck option for people like Markus to use.
If Vitaly does that, problem solved, yes?
Yes.
It's my opinion that if it can be done silently by
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:28:14PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
HOORAY!
This is the best news in a while :)
When will we see a directory listing by Apache2?-)
And the somewhat gloomy question:
What's the status on Faye's and Phil0u's bugs?
--
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:51:34PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
If it is due to 4k stacks,
No, I do not think it is.
reiser4 now refuses to compile if 4k stack is on.
WTF, Redeeman at least runs Reiser4 with 4k stacks...
What's this about?
--
mjt
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:36:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This of course explains why IE is the premier web browser on 95% of the
desktops, right? I mean, it's faster and more secure than all the alternatives,
right? ;)
I think desktops for all the Joe Q. Averages are pretty much a
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:45:26PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
| UPDATE formatting SET policy='never\0' WHERE policy='smart\0' RECURSE;
| instead of just
| UPDATE formatting SET policy='never\0' RECURSE;
| which may break something else...
Both should be allowed. Can that be done now? And with
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
It would be a good idea if the meta filesystem interface always auto
terminates strings (add + '\0') issued by echo. procfs does it that way.
Or add a small parser that allows \n so that cat output would look
better...
--
mjt
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:03:44PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
You are fooling yourself if you think we won't need that -- that reiser4
is the only fs that will ever properly support transactions, or that
every other fs will support the full sys_reiser4. And I think it's
seriously poor design to
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 02:39:59AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
Unless, that is, you've already made it so modular that people who call
sys_reiser on reiser4 won't find it broken on reiser5. If you can do
that without cruft, you are amazing, and the number should go.
But if the syscalls get
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:22:09PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
zam, would you confirm that the fibration plugin is our current default
plugin?
dot-o fibrate is default.
This always puzzles me. Would not ext-1-fibre give the same results for
This always puzzles me. Would not ext-1-fibre
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:22:22PM +0400, Konstantin Sobolev wrote:
Yeah. Luckily I've found LiveCD with 2.6.7 sources patched with one of
autosnapshots that successfully mounted my /usr, so now I'll be able to build
new kernel. Can you recommend some more or less stable autosnapshot that I
can
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:06:16AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
How long until a resizer for v4 is finished/stable? For shrinking?
Isn't this almost an FAQ ;)
Those guys need time, money and time==money.
AFAIK vs is working on something more mission-critical than a resizer,
so my somewhat
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:49:25PM -0500, David Dabbs wrote:
Is bonnie++ the recommended stress tool, or is there a reiser4 stress
utility?
bonnie++ and slow.c are what one usually sees flying around.
fs stress or somesuch is also sometimes used, but it supposedly fragments
Reiser4 quite a bit
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 12:10:22AM +0200, Henning Westerholt wrote:
access to a reiser4 partition produce a kernel oops, something about an
assertion error.
This seems highly irratic, as I seem to recall I only had a null
pointer dereference and paging oops...
My kernel source has also the
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Mikael Cluseau wrote:
Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?
Afaik no.
Last time something like this was tried, it resulted in random
freezings, and there I was not the only one affected.
Although it was an old snapshot.
The -mm tree is
Hi!
How well do the auto-snapshots work for people in general?
I don't know what to think, because I got my kernel working now,
like an act of god, or Nikita Danilov. I asked him to review a bug
report I thought about sending, but it appears mm/vmscan.c has
static int kswapd instead of int
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:19:56PM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
I'll just send this post now, I'll send a follow-up when I'm re-doing
fsck with some switches. This was just a basic fsck /dev/hda1, so maybe
no need to panic yet...
So I proceeded to --build-fs
FSCK: Node (481195), item (5
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:45:47AM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
So now I'll just compile the new auto-snapshot and see what happens...
It did not work.
http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/Reiser4-2004.06.29/
Pictures once again courtesy of my trusty phone, so the quality truly
does suck.
So, err, I'm
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:24:34PM +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
it prints all found corruptions. could you send them ?
The thing is, now that 2.6.7-mm4, latest auto-snapshot, failed,
I didn't get any errors with fsck... So it seems my filesystem
is all alright, at least for the time being.
btw,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:42:25PM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
I'm taking a debugfs.reiser4 -P /dev/hda1 now.
Then I will run additional stuff, but it still seems like the FS is ok
Yeah, I have the metadata dump now, and I will send it to you if you
feel you need it, but the additional
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:00:39PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
it shows serious tree corruption. which reiser4 snapshot is on shrike?
2004.06.24, but ported to 2.6.7 by Piotr Neuman, who I added to the CC.
I probably shouldn't have brought this up, using an unsupported version,
but I guess I
Hi!
* Tree Traverse Pass: scanning the reiser4 internal tree.
FSCK: Node (2013064): The last key [377f5f:4(FB):2e616339375f63:3a45d8:99] in 2 the
node is greater then the right delimiting key [2fa6e:4(FB):6c69626d70342e:1e88ad:1f7c].
FSCK: Node (469959), item (28), unit (0): Points to the
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:30:16PM +0100, Chris Dukes wrote:
But shouldn't it be
Reiser4: No fsck.
or
Reiser4: Fsck, no.
Aren't those slogans AGAINST Reiser4?
I mean, consider the pun that fsck, no! revolves around and the situations
in which you exclaim it...
That's why fsck'ing fast is a
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:48:53AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
This mailing list convinced me that fs in a mount name is uninformative,
though ReiserFS V4 is considered a synonym in documentation and
licensing to Reiser4.
Not to step on anyone's toes, which I still do all the time, please print
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:06:43PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
The Living Filesystem
I suggested the Atomic Filesystem, but Mom pointed out that it added an
additional metaphor to the fastman graphic. I am still thinking about
whether she is right.
Those are cool, as is Plug in to Reiser4, but
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:15:39PM -0400, Nicholas S. Wourms wrote:
I've also noticed, as has been noted in the past, that bk pulls are
still broken. Someone mentioned that it is a problem with the new bk.
If this is true, why not contact Larry for support? Not that it matters
now, since the
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 05:01:17PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
Of course, most of the time people can just buy a new CPU.
Or don't encrypt the game data.
Should we take this off-list?
Please don't, I'm not sure if I'm the only one who finds this
discussion too interesting not to be readable by
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:33:05PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
I know this is the wrong forum perhaps, but AFAIK the reiser4progs
maintainer(s) read this list..
yes, i'm here listening in the darkness...
Some Debian developers are quite anal about these issues, indeed,
I got a bit flamed
Hello
I just started using the latest auto-snapshot.
I noticed weird behavior, that is, processes crash, so bad even C-c doesn't
kill them. For some reason running strace behind them gives me C-c support.
Also pressing tab in bash seems to kill me.
lstat64(/var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 04:50:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My guess is that some *other* process got wedged in the kernel while holding
a kernel lock, causing other processes to block when they needed that lock.
Hmm, aybe. I'll have to take your word for it, since you're the more
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 05:25:03PM +0400, Edward Shushkin wrote:
is builtin and can not be changed by users. The user can only assign
plugins. For each
kind of transform there is special none plugin which means absence of
this transform.
Is there any chance of this looking more like a crypto/
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:20:39AM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
now we have regular reiser4 snapshots (night snapshots) in
http://www.namesys.com/auto-snapshots/ .
Thank you! This has been so long-awaited :)
There is no automated control whether a snapshot is stable or not.
It might be
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:09:17PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
Could this be a plugin/pseudo? Maybe I'm being obsessive, but here's
what I want:
Much more detailed a use case than my initial example, very good
and very much to the point.
$ cd ~/.secret/..metas/crypto
This step would make life
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:03:14AM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:52, Timothy Webster wrote:
Does reiserfs4 include features to allow
vxfs like checkpoints
or netapps snapshots?
no
I am not familiar with these mechanisms, would someone care to
ellaborate a bit?
I
Hi
I reinstated the reiser part of my page:
http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/
The broken package is here:
http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/bk-2004-05-25/
With the screenshots (courtesy of my Siemens SX1, which decided it won't
crash while taking pictures) and the config on the top level.
It's uploading
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:20:53AM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
There is a delay (up to 24h) in the public BK update.
OK. I tried it with what was suggested on the list.
It did not, however work. I added the lines to reiser4.h; should I
have seen some better debug info? I just did a quick
Hi
I was thinking about some potential problems.
Actually, Nikita and I had a discussion about the issues with
cross-architecture compatibility. It would apparently not be easy to
do, because block size equals page size in Reiser4.
Is this common with other file systems? I didn't get to ask
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:22:17PM +0200, Redeeman wrote:
i dont think you will gain anything from selling the resize'er, or any
other plugins. people would just warez it. however, setup paypal! i'd be
ready to donate!
Call me naive, but I don't think people are indecent enough to warez
this.
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:28:13AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
2) You could sell the sources and the rights to do whatever you want,
except redistribute it.
Yes, I think this.
Hopefully people will send in features, then.
I think 5% of the cost of the storage hardware (including raid cards),
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 10:07:28AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
I haven't been able to get a large enough amount from distros to support
us (but thanks to Lindows for being a major help), and darpa sponsors
research not resizers, so I am thinking I might try selling the
I have always tried to
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:14:21AM +0300, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
Can't we get it through ftp/http?
I succumbed and downloaded the free-ish crippleware version of BK
and did pulls on the URLs
bk://bk.namesys.com/bk/reiser4-linux-2.5
bk://bk.namesys.com/bk/reiser4
And there's all sorts of
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:09:47AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
You can, of course, make this available under multiple licenses.
When talking about experimenting with licenses in general, this is
a superb idea.
Consider, double licensing for all Reiser4, kernel- and userland stuff,
GPLv2 and
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:22:32AM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
altough this license grants you the rights to modify the
package, according to your wishes, the original copyright holder
requests that you don't modify the credits printed at [[insert
the occasions when
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 02:55:00PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
shareware, or freeware. Debian has freely chosen not to be involved
with distributing such works for various reasons.
It's really quite a shame that the best distro around is so rigid
as to not allow Reiser's minor, and
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 03:38:47PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
#!/bin/sh
mount -treiser4 /dev/hdX /mnt/reiser4
cd /mnt/reiser4
while `/bin/true`; do
cd metas
done
Do I remember something of my own, or wasn't there some discussion about
this?
Should meta files have meta files
I'd say
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:15:32AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
The ReiserFS maintainer (me, in case you forgot;-) ) decided what
release acls would go into, and you disregarded it and wrote an
implementation that was inconsistent with the one planned.
Surely this can not be such a bad thing.
Hi!
I think this may be of some interest to other people too, so I won't just
take it up on IRC.
What's up with this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ echo -e 'lexicographic\0' ..metas/plugin/fibration
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ cat ..metas/plugin/fibration
1 dot-o fibrate .o files [EMAIL
Grant Miner wrote:
Thanks. I put on that patch and it fixes my make problem.
I could compile glibc as well.
However, GCC did not apparently compile. Debian Sid's GCC 3.3
was the one I tried.
It appeared to have stalled during some if its test cases, I'll
post further details, if required, when
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
