Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

2005-09-20 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 13:42, Jens Axboe wrote: On Tue, Sep 20 2005, Hans Reiser wrote: The name for one. There is no elevator algorithm anywhere in it. There is a least block number first algorithm that was called an elevator, but

Re: List of things requested by lkml for reiser4 inclusion (to review)

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Hans Reiser wrote: Chris Shoemaker wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in coding hours) task, and it

Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: fix a few 'empty body in an if-statement' warnings.

2005-04-14 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:58:54 +0200 (CEST) Jesper Juhl wrote: | When building with gcc -W fs/reiserfs/namei.c:602 has a few warnings | about 'empty body in an if-statement'. This patch silences those warnings. So fix include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h: change #define

[reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool

2001-09-20 Thread Randy.Dunlap
george anzinger wrote: Andrea Arcangeli wrote: those are kernel addresses, can you resolve them via System.map rather than trying to find their start/end line number? Uh, trying to find??? These are the names and line numbers provided by the PPC macros. The only time the address is