Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-17 Thread Marc Perkel
So - anyone have any ideas when ACLs might appear in Reiser4? -- Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-17 Thread Hans Reiser
Marc Perkel wrote: So - anyone have any ideas when ACLs might appear in Reiser4? We have a lot on our plate now, and no one paying for that work. Surely someone will pay for it. Hans

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-16 Thread michael chang
) and then you add the innovative stuff. Otherwise people are going to use Ext3 because it has ACLs and Reiser4 doesn't. That's where I'm at. If it doesn't do ACLs it doesn't work. I need acls. AFAIK, ACLs are separate from xattr. It's just that Ext3 uses xattr to store their ACLs. So

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread Hubert Chan
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:24:17 +0400, Nikita Danilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Not exactly. As a matter of fact, ACL and EA support was already implemented in reiser4. But it used standard xattrs API to interface to the user-land, and it was decided that reiser4 should go sys_reiser4() route

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread Nikita Danilov
Hubert Chan writes: On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:24:17 +0400, Nikita Danilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Not exactly. As a matter of fact, ACL and EA support was already implemented in reiser4. But it used standard xattrs API to interface to the user-land, and it was decided that reiser4

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread Nikita Danilov
Jonathan Briggs writes: On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 00:19 +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote: Hubert Chan writes: On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:24:17 +0400, Nikita Danilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Not exactly. As a matter of fact, ACL and EA support was already implemented in reiser4.

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread Marc Perkel
Nikita Danilov wrote: Sorry, it seems I was too vague. It's exactly the opposite: standard xattr API was abandoned in favour of accessing EAs and ACLs through pseudo files. The latter method is not implemented yet, and I don't know how stable sys_reiser4() API is currently. Hans is the proper

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread Marc Perkel
Nikita Danilov wrote: Well, this song has been sung many times already. :-) Hans has strong opinion about xattr API (which, indeed, is not a paragon of design beauty by a large margin). I'm new to this debate. What is his strong opinion?

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread David Masover
Marc Perkel wrote: Nikita Danilov wrote: Well, this song has been sung many times already. :-) Hans has strong opinion about xattr API (which, indeed, is not a paragon of design beauty by a large margin). I'm new to this debate. What is his strong opinion? Well, I'll let him speak for

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread David Masover
Marc Perkel wrote: Nikita Danilov wrote: Sorry, it seems I was too vague. It's exactly the opposite: standard xattr API was abandoned in favour of accessing EAs and ACLs through pseudo files. The latter method is not implemented yet, and I don't know how stable sys_reiser4() API is

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread David Masover
Jonathan Briggs wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 00:19 +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote: Hubert Chan writes: On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:24:17 +0400, Nikita Danilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Not exactly. As a matter of fact, ACL and EA support was already implemented in reiser4. But it used standard

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread michael chang
away from EXT2/3. Priorities first. Otherwise people are going to use Ext3 because it has ACLs and Reiser4 doesn't. That's where I'm at. If it doesn't do ACLs it doesn't work. I need acls. So why fix something that isn't broken? Just because one person who uses ACLs doesn't use Reiser4 right

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread David Masover
. Otherwise, people won't convert away from EXT2/3. Priorities first. Otherwise people are going to use Ext3 because it has ACLs and Reiser4 doesn't. That's where I'm at. If it doesn't do ACLs it doesn't work. I need acls. So why fix something that isn't broken? Just because one person who uses

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-15 Thread Hubert Chan
are going to use Ext3 because it has ACLs and Reiser4 doesn't. That's where I'm at. If it doesn't do ACLs it doesn't work. I need acls. AFAIK, ACLs are separate from xattr. It's just that Ext3 uses xattr to store their ACLs. So it should be possible to implement ACLs (following the same

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread Mark Nipper
On 13 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: So - how do you get Reiser 4 to work with ACLs? Can't find a mount option in any docs. They are not supported yet under Reiser4. I'm sure this is keeping just a few people from early adoption at the moment. :) -- Mark Nipper

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread Marc Perkel
Mark Nipper wrote: On 13 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: So - how do you get Reiser 4 to work with ACLs? Can't find a mount option in any docs. They are not supported yet under Reiser4. I'm sure this is keeping just a few people from early adoption at the moment. :)

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread michael chang
On 8/14/05, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So - what's the story with that? Why no ACLs in a system built on a dadtbase? Database. And you *could* ask, I suppose, why there are no compression or other plugins available in a system based on plugins. Why there is no repacker when there

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread Nikita Danilov
michael chang writes: On 8/14/05, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So - what's the story with that? Why no ACLs in a system built on a dadtbase? Database. And you *could* ask, I suppose, why there are no compression or other plugins available in a system based on plugins.

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread Marc Perkel
Nikita Danilov wrote: Not exactly. As a matter of fact, ACL and EA support was already implemented in reiser4. But it used standard xattrs API to interface to the user-land, and it was decided that reiser4 should go sys_reiser4() route instead. So, it was reaped. Nikita. OK - now I'm

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 05:38:40 PDT, Marc Perkel said: btw - is Reiser4 still going to get merged into 2.6.13? It's not in 2.6.13-rc6, and I doubt Linus is going to blop *that* big a chunk of code in this late - it's already well into the is this 3-liner too drastic phase. What happens when the

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread Matt Stegman
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: My background is in Netware. Netware did it right. It's permissions that it had 15 years ago were beyond what Linux might ever acheive. Then I downgraded to Windows, then I further downgraded to Linux. In fact when I started using linux it took me

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread David Masover
Marc Perkel wrote: Nikita Danilov wrote: Not exactly. As a matter of fact, ACL and EA support was already implemented in reiser4. But it used standard xattrs API to interface to the user-land, and it was decided that reiser4 should go sys_reiser4() route instead. So, it was reaped. Nikita.

Re: Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-14 Thread David Masover
Marc Perkel wrote: Mark Nipper wrote: On 13 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: So - how do you get Reiser 4 to work with ACLs? Can't find a mount option in any docs. They are not supported yet under Reiser4. I'm sure this is keeping just a few people from early adoption at the

Reiser4 and ACLs

2005-08-13 Thread Marc Perkel
So - how do you get Reiser 4 to work with ACLs? Can't find a mount option in any docs. -- Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com