On Tue, 09 May 2006 00:18:32 +0200, PFC said:
Linux RAID has a special option for that : you can trigger a check,
which
will re-read the entire disks and, if a read error occurs, re-write the
failing sector with good data from the other drives in the RAID. The drive
with the bad
On Sun, 07 May 2006 10:35:44 +0200, PFC said:
In the event of physical HD failure, the procedure goes like this:
Get mail saying a HDD is dead. Replace harddisk, resynchronize RAID.
Use Linux software RAID. Harddrives are cheaper that the time you'll
lose
trying to recover
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
On Sun, 07 May 2006 10:35:44 +0200, PFC said:
In the event of physical HD failure, the procedure goes like this:
Get mail saying a HDD is dead. Replace harddisk, resynchronize RAID.
Use Linux software RAID. Harddrives are cheaper that the time
In the event of physical HD failure, the procedure goes like this:
Get mail saying a HDD is dead. Replace harddisk, resynchronize RAID.
Use Linux software RAID. Harddrives are cheaper that the time you'll lose
trying to recover your data.
I have reiserfs on RAID1 on my PC ; the
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 06:28:01AM -0400, boricua wrote:
running reiserfsck -B bbfile /dev/hda4 is giving me following error
bread: cannot read the block 16 [i/o error]
anyway aroound this?
IO error means block-layer level failure, that is, physical failure.
In the event of physical HD
running reiserfsck -B bbfile /dev/hda4 is giving me following error
bread: cannot read the block 16 [i/o error]
anyway aroound this?
