[reiserfs-list] /etc/fstab

2001-05-19 Thread Krasi Zlatev
I do not want to put in /etc/fstab, because the partition is mounted at start up. /dev/hdd5 /mnt5 reiserfs notail,noatime0 0 How to mount it manually what options should I give to mount? Thanks.

Re: [reiserfs-list] /etc/fstab

2001-05-19 Thread Matthias Andree
Krasi Zlatev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do not want to put in /etc/fstab, because the partition is mounted at start up. /dev/hdd5 /mnt5 reiserfs notail,noatime0 0 How to mount it manually what options should I give to mount? The same :-) You can add noauto to the fstab

Re: [reiserfs-list] [patch] ignore forcefsck

2001-05-19 Thread Hans Reiser
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: For now we do not want it to be ran by boot scripts. So, 3.x.0k will just ignore -f and -a. Ooops, I meant: -f and -a will make reiserfsck to do nothing but print its version. whereas -r and -p are ignored. Thanks, vs

Re: [reiserfs-list] filesystem interfaces

2001-05-19 Thread Matthias Andree
Ragnar Kjørstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. fsync The current fsync interface lacks a couple of interesting features. I believe lazy-fsync has been discussed, but another useful feature is Wait a minute. The major problem is that mail-servers, regardless of their performance efforts, need

Re: [reiserfs-list] ftp.reiserfs.org down?

2001-05-19 Thread Hans Reiser
Dirk Haage wrote: On 18 May 2001 10:17:03 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: You should use ftp.namesys.com. Thanks, vs It should be fixed by now, and reiserfs.org and reiserfs.net should work by now. Hmm, I just get some Infos from domaindiscover,

Re: [reiserfs-list] [patch] ignore forcefsck

2001-05-19 Thread Hans Reiser
Dirk Mueller wrote: On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote: fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a company waiting for the server to come up. Then they should have a sysadmin that knows how to disable it. This is not a policy, its just a reasonable

Re: [reiserfs-list] [patch] ignore forcefsck

2001-05-19 Thread Hans Reiser
Chris Mason wrote: On Saturday, May 19, 2001 06:40:48 PM +0200 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote: fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a company waiting for the server to come up. Then they should have a

Re: [reiserfs-list] [patch] ignore forcefsck

2001-05-19 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Saturday 19 May 2001 12:28, Hans Reiser wrote: fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a company waiting for the server to come up. Conversly that sysadmin might be hours away from the box that needs to be fscked before restarting... In this case, which _does_

Re: [reiserfs-list] [patch] ignore forcefsck

2001-05-19 Thread Chris Mason
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:31:29 AM -0700 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Mason wrote: On Saturday, May 19, 2001 06:40:48 PM +0200 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote: fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin

Re: [reiserfs-list] [patch] ignore forcefsck

2001-05-19 Thread Stefan Traby
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 11:31:29AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: There are two sides of this. fsck is only now getting strong enough that I would start to recommend that kind of thing. As fsck matures, we should at least have the option of ext2 style automatic runs after X number of

Re: [reiserfs-list] What about this one liner in fix_node.c?

2001-05-19 Thread Chris Mason
On Sunday, May 20, 2001 12:07:33 AM +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chris, is this one usefull or obsolete? diff -ur linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c --- linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c Mon Jan 15 18:31:19 2001 +++ linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c