I do not want to put in /etc/fstab, because the partition is mounted at
start up.
/dev/hdd5 /mnt5 reiserfs notail,noatime0 0
How to mount it manually what options should I give to mount?
Thanks.
Krasi Zlatev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not want to put in /etc/fstab, because the partition is mounted at
start up.
/dev/hdd5 /mnt5 reiserfs notail,noatime0 0
How to mount it manually what options should I give to mount?
The same :-)
You can add noauto to the fstab
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
For now we do not want it to be ran by boot scripts. So, 3.x.0k will just ignore
-f and -a.
Ooops, I meant: -f and -a will make reiserfsck to do nothing but print its version.
whereas -r and -p are ignored.
Thanks,
vs
Ragnar Kjørstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. fsync
The current fsync interface lacks a couple of interesting features. I
believe lazy-fsync has been discussed, but another useful feature is
Wait a minute. The major problem is that mail-servers, regardless of
their performance efforts, need
Dirk Haage wrote:
On 18 May 2001 10:17:03 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
You should use ftp.namesys.com.
Thanks,
vs
It should be fixed by now, and reiserfs.org and reiserfs.net should work by now.
Hmm, I just get some Infos from domaindiscover,
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a company
waiting for the server to come up.
Then they should have a sysadmin that knows how to disable it.
This is not a policy, its just a reasonable
Chris Mason wrote:
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 06:40:48 PM +0200 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a
company waiting for the server to come up.
Then they should have a
On Saturday 19 May 2001 12:28, Hans Reiser wrote:
fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a company
waiting for the server to come up.
Conversly that sysadmin might be hours away from the box that needs to be fscked
before restarting... In this case, which _does_
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:31:29 AM -0700 Hans Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 06:40:48 PM +0200 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 11:31:29AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
There are two sides of this. fsck is only now getting strong enough that I
would start to recommend that kind of thing. As fsck matures, we should at
least have the option of ext2 style automatic runs after X number of
On Sunday, May 20, 2001 12:07:33 AM +0200 Dieter Nützel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Chris,
is this one usefull or obsolete?
diff -ur linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c
--- linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c Mon Jan 15 18:31:19 2001
+++ linux/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c
11 matches
Mail list logo