Yep , a weekly status would be really nice :)
H.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fleiter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.6 is out .. reiserfs patch needed ?
Hi Chris!
On Thu, 12
Hi all!
Sorry to bother you, but I wasn't able to read the list for quite a while:
What is the current status of ReiserFS in conjunction with:
a) Linux 2.2.19
b) Linux 2.2.19 with Software RAID 0/1/5
c) Linux 2.4.6
d) Linux 2.4.6 with Software RAID 0/1/5
b) and
Erik Forsberg wrote:
(I was running the disk benchmarking program bonnie++ at the time).
First I suspected hardware errors, since one of the disks have behaved
oddly before, but after unconnecting that (running the raid mirror
Just to reproduce your oops: can you send /etc/raidtab with
so we will have to try testing them more individually (or find the bug).
Thanks for your patience.
Hans
On Friday, July 13, 2001 04:52:36 PM +0400 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stefan Fleiter wrote:
Hi Chris!
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Chris Mason wrote:
Bug fixes need testing, regardless of how correct they look.
You are right, yes.
But I think there often are patches sent to the
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi
Hans Reiser wrote:
Observations:
* Creating the files on reiserfs is twice as fast as xfs
* With notail it's even four times faster, 8 times faster than xfs!
* XFS much faster then reiserfs for duing find . -type f|xargs cat
Suprising to me,
Stefan Fleiter wrote:
Hi Dirk!
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Dirk Mueller wrote:
--- dir.c~ Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001
+++ dir.cWed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001
[..]
This chunk is still missing in 2.4.7-pre6. Is it possible to submit this to
Linus ?
You are perfectly right and for me it
pcg@goof.com ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:53:59PM +0200, Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me packing tails sounds like an excellent way to improve performance,
(not only for you)
especially for lots of small files. That it performs much worse than
