Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: 2.4.7-ac4 disk thrashing

2001-08-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2001 16:31 schrieb Chris Mason: > On Wednesday, August 08, 2001 07:07:39 PM +0400 "Vladimir V.Saveliev" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > "Vladimir V.Saveliev" wrote: > >> > dbench 32 > >> > Throughput 34.7552 MB/sec (NB=43.444 MB/sec 347.552 MBit/sec) > >> > 24

[reiserfs-list] Re: 2.4.7-ac4 disk thrashing

2001-08-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2001 17:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips: > On Wednesday 08 August 2001 12:57, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Could it be that the ReiserFS cleanups in ac4 do harm? > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dreiserfs&m=3D99683332027428&w=3D2 > > > > I suspect the use once patch is the more re

[reiserfs-list] Re: 2.4.7-ac4 disk thrashing

2001-08-08 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Wednesday 08 August 2001 12:57, Alan Cox wrote: > > Could it be that the ReiserFS cleanups in ac4 do harm? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dreiserfs&m=3D99683332027428&w=3D2 > > I suspect the use once patch is the more relevant one. Two things to check: - Linus found a bug in balance_d

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: 2.4.7-ac4 disk thrashing

2001-08-08 Thread Chris Mason
On Wednesday, August 08, 2001 07:07:39 PM +0400 "Vladimir V.Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > "Vladimir V.Saveliev" wrote: > >> > >> > dbench 32 >> > Throughput 34.7552 MB/sec (NB=43.444 MB/sec 347.552 MBit/sec) >> > 24.620u 73.980s 2:02.55 80.4% 0+0k 0+0io 911pf+0w >> > >> >