Hello,
I've done a resizereiserfs on a fs (i wanted to expand it but I write a wrong value
and I
tried to shrink it) and I've done a Ctrl-c to cancel it. The system become unclean and
I had to do a reiserfsck(lots of errors). Then I've done the expand of reiserfs
without errors.
But when I use
Hello,
When I do fsck on this partition, it outputs this:
# reiserfsck --check /dev/home_vg/home_lv
-reiserfsck, 2001-
reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j
Will read-only check consistency of the partition
Will put log info to 'stderr'
Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note
Hello List,
I have a some big problems!
Please need help!
First of all I´m running a IBM DTLA 75GB HD, under SuSE 7.1 with kernel
2.4.7 and hedricks IDE Patch, to access all the Promise FastTrak IDE
Ports. I also use reiserfsprogs-3.x.0j.
My HD has a primary partition and the device is
On Mit, 22 Aug 2001, Palic, Darko wrote:
I have a some big problems!
Please need help!
what problems do you have ?
Dirk
Hi
Chris Mason wrote:
Hi guys,
Is there a schedule/map for things that need to happen before 3.x.0k is no
longer considered a pre release? There's not much point in calling 3.x.0j
the most recent on the ftp site, we've been pointing users away from it for
months.
3.x.0k is not
Hi,
That fatal question ... I've deleted something on a reiserFS partition, and I'm trying
to recover it.
The details, SuSE 7.1, 2.4.6 kernel (reiserFS that comes with distro suse 7.1)
I have a large partition with the deleted file, I brought the machine to single-user
and unmounted
Hi
Eoin Verling wrote:
Hi,
That fatal question ... I've deleted something on a reiserFS partition, and I'm
trying to recover it.
The details, SuSE 7.1, 2.4.6 kernel (reiserFS that comes with distro suse 7.1)
I have a large partition with the deleted file, I brought the machine to
Hi, all
I tried to put together a server setup for production using NFS V2,
ReiserFS and LVM on a hardware RAID 5. Until now I haven't found a
setup which is stable enough.
I tried the following combinations:
1. 2.4.4 with linux-2.4.4-knfsd-6.g.patch.gz
2. stock 2.4.7
3. stock 2.4.9
With all
On Wednesday, August 22, 2001 05:40:35 PM +0400 Vladimir V. Saveliev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Chris Mason wrote:
Hi guys,
Is there a schedule/map for things that need to happen before 3.x.0k is
no longer considered a pre release? There's not much point in calling
3.x.0j the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:22:18PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pagecache control structure, but since it's zero and (almost) exactly 4k,
(... 8k)
10 matches
Mail list logo