Hello, my name is Kenneth Downs. I am told that this list is the appropriate
forum for discussion of the ideas contained in Hans Reiser's whitepaper on
the next version of ReiserFS, http://www.namesys.com/whitepaper.html.
I have read through the whitepaper a few times now, and would like to
e
> From: Adrian Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Cassandra" == Cassandra Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Cassandra> I have taken over support for a machine running the
> Cassandra> 2.2.17 kernel with reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade
> Cassandra> to a later kernel at thi
Thank you. That worked - sort of. Some files on the
partition are missing. Is there any way to find out what
was lost? Was --rebuild-tree the right thing to do (I did
it for all partitions, since all of them reported problems).
I dont know if this is because I ran the old reiserfsck...
Can you t
Ok guys, here's another speedup patch. This has the fix for the
segfault yura found, a few micro optimizations, and changes the
soft buffer limit to 500k.
Stats on the number of reads and writes are printed for each run,
to help tune the soft buffer limit.
This doesn't result in huge performan
On Friday, February 01, 2002 10:19:53 AM -0600 Matthew Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:39:51AM -0500, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday, February 01, 2002 04:05:34 PM + Edward Shushkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> > Hello Matthew.
>> > Al
Cassandra Sewell wrote:
> I have taken over support for a machine running the 2.2.17 kernel with
> reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade to a later kernel at this time. I
> would like to know if this is the correct & latest version of reiserfs
> that can be run with the 2.2.17 kernel. If this is
> "Cassandra" == Cassandra Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cassandra> I have taken over support for a machine running the
Cassandra> 2.2.17 kernel with reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade
Cassandra> to a later kernel at this time. I would like to know
Cassandra> if this i
I have taken over support for a machine running the 2.2.17 kernel with
reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade to a later kernel at this time. I
would like to know if this is the correct & latest version of reiserfs
that can be run with the 2.2.17 kernel. If this is not the correct
reiser, which v
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:08:17AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good idea, or bad? I see it merged in some of Oleg's patches, but it's
> not immediately clear which ones...
You can get patches separately from lkml for now (not yet on ftp).
2 serious are there.
Do not run vanilla 2.5.3
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:39:51AM -0500, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, February 01, 2002 04:05:34 PM + Edward Shushkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > Hello Matthew.
> > Also there is a fragment of reiserfs code that looks like a bad scheduling.
> > Please apply the at
On Friday 01 February 2002 16:59, Michael Lampe wrote:
> Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > this bug seems to be fixed in 3.x.1b-pre1.
> > Cound you try it and tell us about the result.
>
> 3.x.1b-pre1 "fixed" it.
>
> By the way, it doesn't compile out of the box with 2.2 headers. Macro
> IDE_DISK_MAJOR (r
Hi.
Thanks for your reply.
Can I get a pre-built binary for reiserfsck somewhere? I
can only boot up my machine in rescue mode, and that does
not provide compiling capabilities. Unfortunately, I do
not have access to another machine.
thanks,
Vijay
> > Segmentation fault
> Can you please try la
Good idea, or bad? I see it merged in some of Oleg's patches, but it's
not immediately clear which ones...
(Yes, I *know* it's a 2.5.X kernel- the question is whether it's regarded
as "too broken for anything" or "stable enough for a lunatic to consider
testing on" ;)
--
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>
> this bug seems to be fixed in 3.x.1b-pre1.
> Cound you try it and tell us about the result.
>
3.x.1b-pre1 "fixed" it.
By the way, it doesn't compile out of the box with 2.2 headers. Macro
IDE_DISK_MAJOR (reiserfslib.c:1051) is undefined then.
br
Michael Lampe
On Friday, February 01, 2002 04:05:34 PM + Edward Shushkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello Matthew.
> Also there is a fragment of reiserfs code that looks like a bad scheduling.
> Please apply the attached patch against 2.4.17 and tell us about results.
> Thanks,
> Edward.
Ok, I gi
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> Matthew Hunter wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Chris Mason
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >dev/raid/speed_limit_max=5000
> >
> >Which successfully set /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max to
> >5000. However, the boot output from the RAID system stil
Hello!
2.4.14 is somewhat old kernel. There were bugs fixed since then, so I'd
recommend you to upgrade. And reiserfsck --check won't hurt you but
will show is your FS actually ok.
Bye,
Oleg
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:18:03PM +0100, Thomas Lang?s wrote:
> I got this in dmesg on one of
I got this in dmesg on one of our fileservers (it's running RedHat Linux 7.1
with 2.4.14 kernel, serving a reiserfs filesystem to clients over knfsd):
PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: "..., 104PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: wrong result
-1 of search for [115963 1365730 0xfff DIRECT]
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 06:37:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I then tried --rebuild-tree, which dies almost
> immediately with the message:
> FIXME: should set deh_location of previous entry (not
> ready)
> Segmentation fault
Can you please try latest released reiserfsprogs? (3.
20 matches
Mail list logo
