Sander wrote on 01/29/06 23:25:
Andrew Morton wrote (ao):
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm4/
+reiser4-big-update-bug-fix-for-readpage-fix.patch
+reiser4-warnings-cleanup.patch
+reiser4-do-not-use-get_user_pages-and-do-not-check.patch
Hello
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 11:44 +0100, Ps wrote:
Hi,
i've got a kernel panic with kernel 2.6.15.1 + reiser4 patch from
ftp.namesys.com, when writing data to a usb harddisk.
kernel output:
loop4: loop_end_io_transfer err=-95 bi_rw=0x5
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[pdflush(6748)]:
Hi!
I am Bandan and new to the list. I have been a fan of ReiserFS for
around a year now and would like to contribute to it in the form of
fixing some minor bug. As Nikita suggested to me on the IRC channel,
adding comments is also a good idea but I would more like to contribute
in the form of
Joe Feise wrote (ao):
Sander wrote on 01/29/06 23:25:
Andrew Morton wrote (ao):
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm4/
+reiser4-big-update-bug-fix-for-readpage-fix.patch
+reiser4-warnings-cleanup.patch
Hi!
Hi! I got the next message:
Jan 30 12:16:11 sk8n kernel: init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (0)
Jan 30 12:16:11 sk8n kernel: ReiserFS: dm-46: warning: vs-13075:
reiserfs_read_locked_inode: dead inode read from disk [1184 1920 0x0
SD]. This is likely to be race with knfsd. Ignore
But I
RedHat ES Workstation, 2.6.9-11smp
Dell Precision 530 workstation
Dell Powervault RAID with 500Gb RAID partition
reiserfs 3.6.19
The virtual RAID disk was inadvertantly broken when the Dell powervault was
split into two seperate controlers. When the server was brought back up the
original
On Monday 30 January 2006 18:57, Bryant, Phillip -AES wrote:
RedHat ES Workstation, 2.6.9-11smp
Dell Precision 530 workstation
Dell Powervault RAID with 500Gb RAID partition
reiserfs 3.6.19
The virtual RAID disk was inadvertantly broken when the Dell powervault was
split into two
It seems like a form of layering violation to me. Conflation of
meaning for a #define is definitely undue obfuscation, if not out
right bad coding.
Ivan...
On 1/29/06, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
suppose there are two distinct layers of abstraction, one on top of the
other. Suppose
Sander wrote:
reiser4 fixes and cleanups
I think the fix was in this, which we sent in Dec. 31st. I don't know
when it got merged though.
vs, was the slowdown fix in the patch above?
Hi,
i have the same Problem witch 2.6.16-rc1 with the reiser4 Patch from
ftp.namesys.com.
Same error and the System is frozen to. But I wanted to copy data from
Partition A (Reiser3) to Partition B (Reiser4).
greets
Jan
From: Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ps [EMAIL
Wow, are we at last actually stable enough that hardware errors are more
of a problem than software errors for our Reiser4 users?
Rudekjan, you have a bad sector, buy a new drive, use dd_rescue to copy
to it, don't run reiser4.fsck until you get the data onto the new
drive. Why buy a new drive?
To amplify what Hans (accurately) wrote, once you see bad sectors, that
means that you already have many more than you see, and that your hard
drive is all out of spare sectors to silently swap out for when it finds
one.
Basically, there's so much wrong with the surface that your hard drive
On Monday 30 January 2006 08:15, Hans Reiser wrote:
suppose there are two distinct layers of abstraction, one on top of the
other. Suppose someone uses the error condition names of the top layer
in coding the bottom layer when the return values it is used for in the
bottom layer have not the
Clay Barnes wrote:
To amplify what Hans (accurately) wrote, once you see bad sectors,
that means that you already have many more than you see, and that your
hard drive is all out of spare sectors to silently swap out for when
it finds one.
Basically, there's so much wrong with the surface
14 matches
Mail list logo
