Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-11-01 Thread Christopher Barry
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:30, Chris Mason wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:08, JP Howard wrote: On 31 Oct 2002 15:38:19 -0500, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ... The idea is that during boundless operations (creating a hole, and truncates), the journal code wasn't properly reserving

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:59:07PM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: Is this still the infamous NFSD/inode race ? No. This is a bug in journalling code. Something related to improper transaction blocks accounting. Chris said he will try take care of it and rejected my simple, but

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-10-29 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
FYI, This in the log , before the oops : journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big and filer is low on space :o) /dev/sdb1572418604 572341220 77384 100% /storage Should it be because filer hit 0 on space ? Thanks, philippe On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:14:38

Re: [reiserfs-list] Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6

2002-10-29 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: This in the log , before the oops : journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big Yes, this is the assertion that failed (jlen to be less than TRANS_MAX something). and filer is low on space :o)