Hi,
using reiserfsprogs-3.6.19
Here is the error and messages : ...
2 directory entries were hashed with not set hash.
731305 directory entries were hashed with r5 hash.
r5 hash is selected
Flushing..finished
Read blocks (but not data blocks) 313507947
Leaves
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 10:47, Matthias Barremaecker wrote:
Hi,
using reiserfsprogs-3.6.19
Here is the error and messages : ...
2 directory entries were hashed with not set hash.
731305 directory entries were hashed with r5 hash.
r5 hash is selected
Flushing..finished
Hi,
the key (which is in the tree already and supposed to be correct) is
completely corrupted, no one key component is correct. data could be
corrupted in the memory or on read/write -- bad cable, controller,
dying harddrive, etc.
Anyone any suggestions ?
running fsck with the list of
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 14:57, Matthias Barremaecker wrote:
Hi,
the key (which is in the tree already and supposed to be correct) is
completely corrupted, no one key component is correct. data could be
corrupted in the memory or on read/write -- bad cable, controller,
dying
How do you sugest I swap a hd in a LVM raid with already data on it ?
dd_rescue hd to a relable one change lvm according to the change.
if you need our assistance please use our www.namesys.com/support.html
service.
I start to find that answer super funny.:)) I'm willing to pay if you
fix
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 16:28, Matthias Barremaecker wrote:
How do you sugest I swap a hd in a LVM raid with already data on it ?
dd_rescue hd to a relable one change lvm according to the change.
if you need our assistance please use our www.namesys.com/support.html
service.
I
Situation :
LVM with reiserfs
2 onboard IDE controllers = 8 disks
I can't connect another disk fysicly
perform dd_rescue'ing on another computer.
or alternatively you can pull out a working disk out, put a
new one, dd_rescue the broken one to a new one, put the new
one instead of the
