[reiserfs-list] Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: [reiserfs-list] reiserfs_read_inode2: dead inode read fromdisk]]

2002-04-30 Thread Nikita Danilov
Hello, Basil, messages about read_inode2() and do_truncate() you see are harmless, so you can safely ignore them. Details (if you are interested) are the following: 1. file is being deleted by unlink(2). iput() removes inode from hash table and sleeps doing IO truncating file body. On-disk

Re: [reiserfs-list] fsync() Performance Issue

2002-04-30 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 04:28:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wondering if anyone out there may have some suggestions on how to improve the performance of a system employing fsync(). I have to be able to guaranty that every write to my fileserver is on disk when the

Re: [reiserfs-list] fsync() Performance Issue

2002-04-30 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 10:20, Oleg Drokin wrote: Attached is a speedup patch for 2.4.19-pre7 that should help your fsync operations a little. (From Chris Mason). Filesystem cannot do very much at this point unfortunatelly, it is ending up waiting for disk to finish write operations. Also

RE: [reiserfs-list] fsync() Performance Issue

2002-04-30 Thread berthiaume_wayne
Thanks. I'll start putting this one into test. Wayne. -Original Message- From: Chris Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:28 AM To: Oleg Drokin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] fsync() Performance Issue On Tue,