On Die, 12 Jun 2001, Lars Grobe wrote:
shrink_id_map: objectid map shrinked: used 4096,5 blocks
[...]
grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 5120. 5 blocks
[...]
they're not errors, just debug output. Ignore it. I don`t know why it is
still printed, its so confusing..
Dirk
On Die, 12 Jun 2001, root wrote:
bad_stat_data: 3763 is shared by at least two files
shared data never sounds nice.
Which version of reiserfsck did you use ?
You could try finding out which files are affected and simply copy and then
delete them. Probably the corruption should be solved
On Fre, 15 Jun 2001, Jens Benecke wrote:
ugh... ugly. Can you mount reiserfs 'noatime', like ext2? IIUC, this would
solve my problem.
sure you can!
Dirk
On Son, 01 Jul 2001, Martin Wilck wrote:
Any ideas what this is due to? How can I debug it ?
reiserfsck --check ?
Dirk
On Mit, 04 Jul 2001, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
You might want to use a fix for reiserfs_readdir's bug fix found recently.
This fix missed 2.4.6
Thanks,
vs
--- dir.c~Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001
+++ dir.c Wed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
// user space
On Fre, 20 Jul 2001, Jan Johansson wrote:
automatically checks? I looked trough the list archives, but couldnt find
much.. or i didnt look closely enough.
man 5 fstab:
The sixth field, (fs_passno), is used by the fsck(8) pro
gram to determine the order in which filesystem
On Sam, 21 Jul 2001, Daniel wrote:
Hey the subject says it all... ^ ^ ^
everything important except quota support is in.
Dirk
On Mon, 06 Aug 2001, Rafael Herrera wrote:
bad_directory_item: block 559823: item 203453 203647 0x1 DIR, len 314, entry count
12, fsck need 0, format old has entry . with wrong deh_state 147174
bad_directory_item: block 559823: item 203453 203647 0x1 DIR, len 314, entry count
12, fsck need
On Don, 09 Aug 2001, Adriano Nagelschmidt Rodrigues wrote:
I just read the mail below from Linus on the kernel mailing list. All
my fs are ReiserFS and, needless to say, I'm worried that the final 2.4.8
won't have the necessary ReiserFS corrections.
Well, seems like we have to send in the
On Mit, 22 Aug 2001, Palic, Darko wrote:
I have a some big problems!
Please need help!
what problems do you have ?
Dirk
On Fre, 21 Sep 2001, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
the root partition), I get some errors about bitmaps (I couldn't get the
errors to post it here because I lost the log. What I do is start the
system with a rescue disk, I backup all my root partition data (I can copy
the data without lost! this
All spin-downs occur during heavy dbench (16/32/+ clients) on the same
partition (/dev/sda8; the last one).
Most likely the drive is overheating and is spinning down/up again to
recalibrate itself. you should give it a better cooling ;-)
Dirk
On Fre, 19 Okt 2001, Dan wrote:
or is the code built right in these days?
No additional patches required for 2.4.12.
+--+
| BRAVENET WEB SERVICES |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Sam, 03 Nov 2001, Dave Mason wrote:
to go fine (I let it do an extra 100MB before stopping it). Then I
tried copying it to the original partition. It again locked up, but
this time came back without umount/mount, so I'm not sure that served
any purpose the first time.
Are you using
A-sched-yield.patch
This patch fixes typo in fs/reiserfs/journal.c that inadvertently
cleared some flags from current process scheduler policy bitmask,
for example, silently converting real-time processes to normal ones.
looks okay. why isn't it submitted ?
Hi,
I'm curious, is there any of the developers doing regular tests of reiserfs
with recent kernels under Cerberus?
VA Linux's testsuite is probably good at detected load-dependend
filesystem-corruption bugs.
Dirk
Hi,
there is a thinko in the procfs-output. As the CONV output is imho confusing
(as the corresponding mount option is sticky and should only be used once),
I've turned it into outputting the filesystem version:
--- linux-2.4.16/fs/reiserfs/procfs.c Fri Nov 9 23:18:25 2001
+++
On Fre, 04 Jan 2002, Scott Simpson wrote:
there any way to detect if a change has been made to a file such as data
changing, a change in ownership, a permissions change, etc
programmatically? I looked through the various file system source code
in the Linux kernel and didn't see anything
On Mit, 09 Jan 2002, W. Wilson Ho wrote:
write delay, and writes that might be cached (or reordered) for a
much longer time than physical disk?
Are you sure that iSCSI reorders writes ? that would be pretty stupid.
Dirk
On Die, 09 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to add the conv option to /etc/fstab for my reiserfs root
partition and did lose. I had to boot from CD, mount my root partition,
reformat it using v3.6 disk format, copy the old content back, reboot the
new root partition from CD
On Sam, 04 Mai 2002, Chris Mason wrote:
Hmmm, not good at all. Are these 3 systems IDE or scsi? Do they run
additional patches on top of pre7? What kernels pre7 have you tried
that didn't show this problem?
All IDE. The kernel that didn't show this problem was 2.4.16 (plain). No
On Mon, 06 Mai 2002, Chris Mason wrote:
Please tell us everything about your IDE config. Jens and I are already
trying to track down some odd reiserfs + ide problems on 2.4.19pre7, but
so far that was only with our barrier write patches applied.
There is not much common. two of them are VIA
On Mon, 06 Mai 2002, Chris Mason wrote:
Any suggestions on how I might reproduce locally?
not much. maybe try a lot of open, unlinked files when pressing reset and
then check the md5sum's of all files..
Dirk
Hi,
just being curious: is reiserfs anywhen going to use the jbd layer that was
introduced with the ext3 kernel merge ?
Dirk
On Don, 27 Jun 2002, Daniel Harris wrote:
Here is the log of what happens when I run reiserfsck on the drive :
grow_id_map: objectid map expanded: used 5120, 5 blocks
This is an extremely old reiserfsck version. Use a newer one.
Dirk
On Die, 03 Dez 2002, Jason Mancini wrote:
size of the symlink should be 13 bytes, so
somehow bits 00A0 are on...
sounds like a bad harddrive. run badblocks.
--
Dirk (received 162 mails today)
On Mit, 12 Feb 2003, Anders Widman wrote:
Just a question. (I know lots of people will shout at me for asking,
but please don't :) Will V3/4 be ported to Windows, or are we doomed
to use the new MS database with integrated Palladium software?
very unlikely. porting a filesystem is about
27 matches
Mail list logo
