Hi Martyn,
Currently tracker master depends on GStreamer 1.0, but the latest tarball
available still depends in GStreamer 0.10.
Is there any chance to have a new tarball with the new dependecy?
This can make possible a GNOME 3.7.2 release without building Gstreamer
0.10 at all.
Just ask If you
On 11/21/2012 10:50 AM, Javier Jardón wrote:
Hi Martyn,
Currently tracker master depends on GStreamer 1.0, but the latest
tarball available still depends in GStreamer 0.10.
Is there any chance to have a new tarball with the new dependecy?
This can make possible a GNOME 3.7.2 release without
It won't go in the Settings.
Why not? Why was the forced fallback in Settings instead of the Tweak Tool
in the first place?
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
There are two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming
things and off-by-one errors.
pgphg93vMwDJQ.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 14:27 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 08:17 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
So, what to do ? Thankfully, we have a pretty awesome extension
mechanism in gnome-shell (extensions.gnome.org), and there are a ton
of extensions out there which allow users to
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se wrote:
It won't go in the Settings.
Why not? Why was the forced fallback in Settings instead of the Tweak Tool
in the first place?
+1
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
There are two hard problems in computer science: cache
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 14:11 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
It won't go in the Settings.
Why not? Why was the forced fallback in Settings instead of the Tweak Tool
in the first place?
To work-around driver bugs. We might replace the force fallback
setting with a force software rendering switch
hi;
On 21 November 2012 14:05, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:17:16AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
We haven't made a final decision yet on how to let users turn on this
'classic mode' - it may be a switch in gnome-tweak-tool or something
else.
I'm wondering
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
to be fair, I'd envision this as a completely separate session that
you need to install and select, similar to what Ubuntu does —
especially if we want to call it GNOME Classic.
I don't think a separate session will work
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
to be fair, I'd envision this as a completely separate session that
you need to install and select, similar to what Ubuntu does —
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:56 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I don't think a separate session will work very well for this - for
one thing, setting this up will require a number of settings to be
tweaked (e.g. the one for the minimize button), and alternative
sessions don't have the right
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 08:17 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
So, what to do ? Thankfully, we have a pretty awesome extension
mechanism in gnome-shell (extensions.gnome.org), and there are a ton
of extensions out there which
hi Andre;
On 21 November 2012 13:27, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Can we make testing beta versions (and porting extensions to the next
major version of GNOME) more attractive / easier for extension authors?
Have Shell maintainers published info on Code changes which may affect
On 21 November 2012 22:15, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
I will try to do this tonight.
Great! Thanks
I was going to do a new release of 0.15.0 with the new libgrss and
gstreamer deps. There might be other things in master not on the stable
branches, but there isn't much. I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Andre;
On 21 November 2012 13:27, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Can we make testing beta versions (and porting extensions to the next
major version of GNOME) more attractive / easier for extension authors?
14 matches
Mail list logo
