Release team involvement

Hi all, Over the last few years I haven't contributed much to the release team. It's time to come to the conclusion that it won't change and it's better to leave the team. I hope clearly acknowledging this ensures there's room for others to take over. Thanks for all the nice meetings over the

Re: gnome-photos: String freeze break request (GNOME/gnome-photos!26)

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:22:31PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > 1/2 from r-t 2/2 -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Extra release team meeting?

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:58:09PM -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > Does this sound good? I don't check release-team too often. All the dates are during my working hours; I don't work on GNOME. I assume we'll stick to a 1 hour meeting? If so I could still do that. I'll need to check my

Re: Renaming gnome-tweak-tool to gnome-tweaks?

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:06:46AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > Thank you Michael. I'm told that I also need a second person from the > > Release Team to approve my proposal. > > Do you? It's been over a week

Re: g-s-t rename to gnome-themes-extra

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:05:37PM +0100, Juraj Fiala wrote: > I hope I answered any questions raised, if not, ask away :-) +1 Please announce to distributor-list. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Ubuntu desktop to GNOME meeting

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:24:21AM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote: > > Items discussed (rough minutes!): […] > > These all look like technical issues/questions and I don’t think the > engagement team is the right place to discuss them. desktop-devel-list > seems more appropriate, do you mind

Ubuntu desktop to GNOME meeting

Hi, There was a public IRC meeting where Ubuntu desktop team discussed the switch to GNOME. It'll be followed by many more meetings. IRC log: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/04/18/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t15:30 Etherpad: http://pad.ubuntu.com/n08SOl5xiA (requires Ubuntu one account with access to

Re: Let's fix our NEWS files!

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 07:12:03PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:40:14AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > The NEWS files we release [1] obviously use UTF-8 encoding, but when > > it's displayed from a web browser the browser has no way to know that. >

Re: Let's fix our NEWS files!

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:40:14AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > The NEWS files we release [1] obviously use UTF-8 encoding, but when > it's displayed from a web browser the browser has no way to know that. > I think Firefox has some heuristic to guess the encoding, but we should > make it

Re: late Wayland changes

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:34:15AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > With the scheduling of guadec, .90 and vacations, we missed the boat > with some Wayland related changes that we still want to get into 3.22. > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769936 (mutter) >

Re: Talking about 3.20 to the adboard

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:29:27PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote: > We're having an advisory board meeting at the end of the month and > we're looking for someone to present on the 3.20 release. Would > someone from the release team be interested in doing it? End of March? I didn't do too much

Re: Minor UI freeze break - bug 745095

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:32:23AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: With the notification redesign landing so late, it had some rough edges in certain places. I'd like to land a small CSS patch to take care of some of those.

Fwd: Re: GNOME 3.16 Release Video: Manuscript for revision

Think we should check as well. Mattias: especially you :) I cannot check too much, still haven't packaged 3.15.x. Urgh. I think I can only do that after 3.16.0 :-( -- Regards, Olav ---BeginMessage--- Hi everyone, Now that the 3.15.90 release is out I have written the last few bits into the

Re: late coming features

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:29:41AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: First, Kalev and Richard are merging Kalev's work on moving codec (and font, mime-handler, etc) installation support from gnome-packagekit to gnome-software. This will let us drop gnome-packagekit for good. This affects

Re: Security bugs in unmaintained/maintenerless librsvg

[ Adding secur...@suse.de ] On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 09:30:30AM +0100, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:15 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:31:38AM +0100, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote: On Sun, 2015-02-01 at 23:45 +0100, Olav

Re: Security bugs in unmaintained/maintenerless librsvg

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:31:38AM +0100, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote: On Sun, 2015-02-01 at 23:45 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: Hello distributors, We've received various security bugs about librsvg. As that module is unmaintained, these bugs have not been fixed. These bugs

Fwd: Security bugs in unmaintained/maintenerless librsvg

Gave pre-warning about the security bugs we received at secur...@gnome.org. -- Regards, Olav ---BeginMessage--- Hello distributors, We've received various security bugs about librsvg. As that module is unmaintained, these bugs have not been fixed. These bugs and various others will be made

Re: r-t FOSDEM meeting

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:33:18AM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: Meeting at the GNOME booth? Saturday 15h? Sunday is desktop room, so prefer Saturday afternoon. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Release Team Meeting: Sunday Nov 23, 19UTC

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:23:05AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Hi all, So lets try again ;) Let's not wait anymore, only Javier, Matthias and I did complete the doodle, and there's only one time that would work, so I picked it. Sunday, November 23rd, 19UTC Oops, completely missed

Re: gtk+ 3.15.0

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:56:59PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: This will really upset Oxygen-gtk author. Could we have a bit of backstory and suggestions for Oxygen-gtk usecase (blogpost)? Otherwise this will likely

Re: gtk+ 3.15.0

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:08:28AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I trust that you make the right assumptions, but if this support is really gone, it is a bit strange to say something else just 2 months before. When I said that, I didn't know that Benjamin would remove them entirely - I

Re: gtk+ 3.15.0

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 05:26:28AM +, Matthias Clasen wrote: * Theming: - Context menus use the default font instead of inheriting from the widget they are attached to - Theming engines are no longer used This will really upset Oxygen-gtk author. Could we have a bit of backstory and

Re: krb5-auth-dialog DOAP

On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: I just cam across diff --git a/krb5-auth-dialog.doap b/krb5-auth-dialog.doap index 593caab..96069f5 100644 --- a/krb5-auth-dialog.doap +++ b/krb5-auth-dialog.doap @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ - category

Re: moduleset review

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:50:14PM +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: I'd be ok with both changes I think is clearer ro have a matching between meta modules and the file, as we have with meta-gnome-apps-tested and gnome-apps now. So we can have: gnome-core to build meta-gnome-core gnome-core-apps

Re: Archived git modules

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:12:53PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: The following git modules have been archived: - clutter-gstreamermm - divifund - drgeo - firestarter - gimmie - gnome-docker - gnome-launch-box - gnome-mime-data - gnome-python-extras - guikachu - hipo - jana - jumpnbumpmenu - libgail

DOAP files: core,core-apps,apps categories (=moduleset)

In a given doap file, there is an item defining the category: category rdf:resource=http://api.gnome.org/doap-extensions#desktop; / I've added: - core - core-apps - apps The following are not allowed anymore in changed doap files: - admin - bindings - desktop - development - platform

Archived git modules

The following git modules have been archived: - sabayon - nanny - gnome-python - gtk-theme-engine-clearlooks - drivel - annum - at-poke - docbook-dtds - pygtkglext - java-gobject-introspection - model-examples - j5tester - pyorbit - podsleuth - perl-Champlain - perl-Gtk2-Champlain

gnome-js-common: no activity, but seed dependency

While adding categories, noticed gnome-js-common. It is a dependency for seed. Seed is a suggests for libpeas. Wondering why this isn't maintained. Last release in 2010. Suggestions on what to do with this? -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: gnome-js-common: no activity, but seed dependency

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: Suggestions on what to do with this? gnome-packagekit is still in core. Can this be removed due to GNOME Software? -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org

Re: gnome-js-common: no activity, but seed dependency

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:01:25PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: Suggestions on what to do with this? gnome-packagekit is still in core. Can this be removed due to GNOME Software? gnome-screenshot is now not strictly needed, gnome

Re: gnome-js-common: no activity, but seed dependency

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:07:04PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: gnome-screenshot is now not strictly needed, gnome-shell implements an interface and gnome-settings-daemon used to call gnome-screenshot, but nowadays calls dbus interface of gnome-shell. gnome-system-log: not needed with gnome-logs

Re: gnome-js-common: no activity, but seed dependency

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:11:40PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: gnome-system-log: not needed with gnome-logs right? I put it under deprecated for now. Need to fix what we release... gtk-engines: put it under deprecated -- Regards, Olav ___ release

Re: gnome-js-common: no activity, but seed dependency

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:19:46PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: gtk-engines: put it under deprecated mousetweaks: according to moduleset is a dependency for gnome-shell. Is this still the case? -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org https

convert-to-tarballs.py: need requests python module

Hey, I changed convert-to-tarballs.py slightly: 1. Now needs requests python module (available on RHEL6 due to EPEL) 2. Reuses connections 3. Various redirects are avoided Above should speed everything up quite a bit. -- Regards, Olav ___

git.gnome.org per repository stats

Noticed that cgit has stats which unfortunately are disabled by default. You can actually see things per week/month/quarter/year. https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/stats/?period=yofs=10 Commits per author per year Author 2011201220132014Total Matthias Clasen

Re: Minutes from meeting yesterday

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:47:17AM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Olav Vitters wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:21:47AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: [ ] @olav Send tarball reminders automatically Done. I need to tweak it more in future though. Indeed, I noticed the GUADEC email being

Re: Minutes from meeting yesterday

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:29:51PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Olav Vitters wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:47:17AM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Olav Vitters wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:21:47AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: [ ] @olav Send tarball reminders automatically

Re: Minutes from meeting yesterday

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:21:47AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: [ ] @olav Send tarball reminders automatically Done. I need to tweak it more in future though. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release

Minutes from meeting yesterday

[ ] @olav Send tarball reminders automatically [ ] Core vs apps is confusing. Clean it up. Move apps in core to apps. Marketing apps is now done via Software [ ] Feature proposal purpose and we didn't do it last time [ ] Define what release team commits to. E.g. blocker bug pushing [ ] @olav Allow

Consistent breakage of nautilus desktop file due to sl.po

Hi, https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/log/po/sl.po #: ../data/nautilus.desktop.in.in.h:3 msgid folder;manager;explore;disk;filesystem; -msgstr mapa;upravljalnik;datoteke;raziskovalec;datotečni sistem;disk +msgstr mapa;upravljalnik;datoteke;raziskovalec;datotečni sistem;disk; I've noticed

Vala release for GNOME 3.13.3

Hi, Folks 0.9.7.1 doesn't seem to build due to needing a newer vala: http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20140624113915.ovitters.valstar.12186/log/folks-0.9.7.1-1.mga5/build.0.20140624114004.log | zeitgeist-2.0.vapi:7.80-7.95: error: The type name `GLib.Cancellable'

Re: GNOME 3.13.2

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:09:03AM +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: To compile GNOME 3.13.2, you can use the jhbuild [2] modulesets [3] (which use the exact tarball versions from the official release). gnome-color-manager needs a release so it builds against vte 2.91 API. -- Regards, Olav

Re: release artifacts

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:31:33PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I've also produced a live cd and uploaded it here: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME312-LiveCD.iso Please link to download.gnome.org, automatically mirrored around the world:

Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.

[ pretty tired so this message is harsher than intended ] On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:46:02PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Hey Sri, nice of you to join the discussion, I think eventually though we are going to have to monitor and see where the discussion is going. Debian is an important

Fwd: Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.

FYI There is a discussion going on within Debian that could possibly result in them demanding us to work on any init system. If not, we should provide alternative implementations. This under threat of GNOME being removed from Debian. I've tried to make clear we're not init system developers.

Re: GNOME 3.11.5

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:36:25PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: The fifth release of the GNOME 3.12 development cycle is here. See [1] for the new features that have been proposed for this cycle. See [2] for some visual impressions of GNOME 3.11.5. While packaging I noticed the following: -

Aligning suites across Bugzilla, git, jhbuild, ftp.gnome.org

There was a request on IRC to show the various categories we have into clear sections: - core - core-apps - non-core-apps - other apps This in Bugzilla, Git and jhbuild. One complication is non-GNOME 3 modules/products on Bugzilla as well as Git. We should try and have one overview in: - jhbuild

ftp.gnome.org not syncing

I noticed ftp.gnome.org not syncing. Meaning that tarballs from master.gnome.org don't end up on ftp.gnome.org. I've pinged the sysadmins of ftp.gnome.org. Hopefully all fixed before 3.10.1 release. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org

Minutes Release Team meeting 2013-10-08

Release Team Meeting, 2013-10-08, 18h UTC = Attendance == Present: Frederic Peters (fredp) Luca Ferretti (elleuca) Javier Jardón (jjardon) Olav Vitters (ovitters) Alejandro Piñeiro (API) Colin Walters (walters) Late: Matthias Clasen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

[ Apologies for replying so late I am not intending to startup the discussion regarding systemd ] On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: For the record we did and still do support setups that upstream does not care about. * In the past, we had

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:41:41AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: It seems a bit weird that although work is done to ensure systemd is optional, in the end just a systemd dependency is taken (Debian, Gentoo). How much work is going on for non-systemd vs the amount of distributions which would

Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

fyi -- Regards, Olav ---BeginMessage--- El vie, 09-08-2013 a las 02:26 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn escribió: Pacho Ramos schrieb: - openBSD is simply supplying the semibroken Gnome stuff running with their setup (without multiseat working, neither power management, gdm service

Re: New feature proposals period start

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:01:37AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Release Team release-team@gnome.org wrote: Hello all, New feature proposals period start For more information about 3.9, the full schedule, the official module lists and the proposed

Re: mutter-wayland 3.9.91

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:06:15AM +, Giovanni Campagna wrote: Download http://download.gnome.org/sources/mutter-wayland/3.9/mutter-wayland-3.9.91.tar.xz (1.68M) sha256sum: 0a218d1fb37b80a287287a4ba4295117fdb663cb260b9570e191074e69253066 Will mutter-wayland stay as a separate

Re: Fwd: Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:04:56PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: Noticed some Mir thread @ ubuntu-devel. Corrected some misinformation about GNOME OS. Also made it clear that GNOME will go Wayland, don't rely on our X support. And now also the other message -- Regards, Olav ---BeginMessage

Re: Wayland announcement

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: Think we should create an announcement for Wayland. Focus on what we plan to deliver and when. What we suggest distributions to do. Give a hint that we

Wayland announcement

Think we should create an announcement for Wayland. Focus on what we plan to deliver and when. What we suggest distributions to do. Give a hint that we really like systemd, but still optional, etc. At same time, small item about non-Linux impact. Obviously it would've been better if this email

Re: Porting GNOME to Wayland

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:32:51PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Spring is in the air - things change, people are looking for things to try and new goals. I propose that we set ourselves a new goal: port GNOME to Wayland Based on the lack of negative feedback, I've updated

Re: working on a bigger proposal

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:08:27PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: Policy should be aligned to / described in https://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/WhatWeRelease I wrote a blogpost about Wayland and partly Mir: http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2013/03/19/wayland/ I actually assumed Canonical

Re: working on a bigger proposal

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:24:45PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Olav Vitters wrote: but both are _not_required_, only encouraged. We can then revisit this somewhere during 3.10.0. s/during/after/ ? We should have a good idea around code freeze time. But maybe we want to wait until we get

Re: working on a bigger proposal

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:30:38PM +0100, Piñeiro wrote: [2] https://live.gnome.org/Wayland/Gaps#Accessibility Then we need to get that done (preferably in a freedesktop.org way). There currently is 30.000 USD for accessibility, which is not a lot of you need to pay multiple someones. Still,

Re: gnome-terminal bug #695757

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Christian Persch wrote: during 3.7 the New terminal menu entries were removed from gnome-terminal's context menu. However, planned work that would have added a way to create a new terminal to the app menu hasn't happened yet. Since it's the

Re: Freeze break request: Rename .desktop files back to the 3.6 filenames

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:10:23PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 12:49 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: gnome-calculator and several of the gnome-games have been renamed this cycle (five-or-more, four-in-a-row, gnome-chess, gnome-klotski, gnome-mahjongg, gnome-mines,

Re: working on a bigger proposal

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:16:27AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Let me know what you think +1 But you mean work only on Wayland, or on Wayland as well as xorg? -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: working on a bigger proposal

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:57:21AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: But you mean work only on Wayland, or on Wayland as well as xorg? That question has different answers, depending on what you mean. Support for X applications is not going away. I know that Wayland supports X applications.

Re: working on a bigger proposal

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:27:42PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: 3.16: xorg = alpha :P Wayland only GNOME (not gtk+) = 4.0? :P Just trolling. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team

Re: Boxes UI freeze break request

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:33:09PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Hill wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Michael Hill mdhil...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, help was just merged and the app menu needs a 'Help' entry to access it. Patch is pending.

Re: Announcement/RFC: jhbuild continuous integration testing

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:12:10AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: That is indeed the long-term plan, but there's still some work to be done before we can do that. The machine we are running this on has 64 2.7 GHz cores and 64 GB of RAM, that really isn't a bottleneck right now. The main two

Re: Announcement/RFC: jhbuild continuous integration testing

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:59 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:53:17AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: The main issue that I see with this is that it's much harder to filter away/opt out, so it requires some

Re: fallback mode planning

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 07:06:33AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: - Sent a mail to distributor-list (not much feedback yet) I forwarded it to our development list. Not much feedback aside from the expected: - should drop GNOME shell, only use fallback - driver issues - slow when two monitors are

Re: continuing last weekends meeting

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:37:00AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: We didn't get to many important things last weekend, like fallback mode, feature review, etc. Shall we continue the meeting next weekend, same time ? Or what is the next possible time for everybody ? Likely have dinner outside

Fwd: Re: Ubuntu may ship Nautilus 3.4 in Ubuntu 12.10 and consider other file managers

We should ensure that things like Nautilus changes are announced/proposed during Feature phase. -- Regards, Olav ---BeginMessage--- Le 08/08/2012 21:36, Adam Dingle a écrit : According to comments #1 and #3 in this bug, Ubuntu is considering going back to Nautilus 3.4 in the upcoming 12.10

Re: meeting materials: what is gnome

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:09:00PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Here is a revised version, incorporating Andre's feedback. More feedback still welcome. I think the GNOME Desktop bit should be moved above the freedesktop.org bit and the Gtk+ glib sections. At the moment it is more like a

Re: Next R-T meeting

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:08:31AM +0900, Javier Jardón wrote: Time for another release team meeting!! Proposing 17:00 UTC Add if you are available: Date: | Tues10 | Wed11 | Alejandro | Andre | Colin| Frederic | Javier |OK OK Kjartan| Luca

Re: live image

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:55:39PM -0400, Ray Strode wrote: Hey, On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: I've invited to to the Google+ GNOME Page thing. If you want to announce there too, then please accept. Otherwise, I'll do. I don't think I got

Re: gnome-panel 3.4.3

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:20:48AM +, Luca Ferretti wrote: Clock * Port to modern GNOME tecnologies, so no more GConf in gnome-panel (Giovanni Campagna) * Adapt to Evolution-Data-Server API changes (Matthew Barnes) gnome-panel 3.4.3 should not depend on eds

Re: gnome-panel 3.4.3

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:35:38AM +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: 2012/6/26 Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:20:48AM +, Luca Ferretti wrote:   Clock        * Port to modern GNOME tecnologies, so no more GConf in          gnome-panel (Giovanni Campagna

Re: live image

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:55:51PM -0400, Ray Strode wrote: I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here: I've invited to to the Google+ GNOME Page thing. If you want to announce there too, then please accept. Otherwise, I'll do. -- Regards, Olav

Re: Next r-t meeting

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:27:14PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:14 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: On 24 April 2012 10:21, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: Andre Klapper wrote: Time for another release team meeting? Proposing 17:00UTC (19:00CEST). Add

Fwd: Re: upstart beyond Ubuntu 12.04

FYI In case you don't enjoy discussing on LWN as much as I do: Announcement was that Ubuntu stays with upstart. Initial impression that it was forever and political, but not so black/white fortunately. Want to know the future plans. I don't care about low level stuff other than it should just

Re: Fwd: Re: upstart beyond Ubuntu 12.04

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:39:56AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: My goal is less difference between distributions btw (especially for low level stuff). PS: Anyone going to UDS? -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: Next r-t meeting

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Time for another release team meeting? All dates are fine with me. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do

modules not in jhbuild

Seems we include some stuff in Core+Apps that is not in jhbuild list: - gnome-power-manager - gtk-engines - libunique - rest I think libunique if really not needed should be removed from the 3.4 core moduleset. -- Regards, Olav ___

Re: aisleriot 3.3.2: missing help translations

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Christian Persch wrote: Could you confirm that those translations are missing in the tarball and if so, upload a new one? This was a yelp-tools bug, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669572 . I'll do a release for 3.4.0 on monday (and

Re: UI freeze break request: Sweel-foop

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:47:33AM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: [CC'ing gnome-doc-list - please CC them on UI requests] On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 00:58 +0100, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote: Can I get a UI freeze break approval for swell-foop in bug #671849? When the game size is small the Game

Re: empathy-accounts UI changes

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:13:27AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Guillaume Desmottes wrote: We've done some UI review of the new version of empathy-accounts [0]. With the help of Allan I've picked and fixed some low hanging fruits: This still needs approval by the documentation team, but

Non-GNOME security people on secur...@gnome.org

I was asked by someone from RH if he could basically join the GNOME security team as a generic security person. Meaning: not favouring or representing RH. This means: - joining secur...@gnome.org separate list; it is possible to add other people - seeing all security marked bugs no clue if

Re: 20120308 meeting minutes

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:08:50PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Missing: Olav Vitters (bkor) I said beforehand I wouldn't be available, so s/Missing/Regrets/. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: NetworkManager-vpnc 0.9.3.995

On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:19:28PM +, Dan Williams wrote: http://download.gnome.org/sources/NetworkManager-vpnc/0.9/NetworkManager-vpnc-0.9.3.995.tar.xz (326K) sha256sum: 1e0542aebbe40ced9d68271e990cf1d11b6fd6abeef528c727be58eb0c9e868c Doesn't build because of -Werror (GtkGrid):

Re: NetworkManager-vpnc 0.9.3.995

On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote: Please do not use -Werror in tarballs. Note that NetworkManager itself also fails, but at least not due to -Werror: -Werror isn't the problem, that catches bugs. What's the problem is that these by default enable deprecation

Re: Freeze request break for keyring prompts in gnome-shell

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:59:53PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote: I'd like to request a UI freeze break for gnome-shell in 3.4. I was away on vacation while the UI freeze happened and didn't manage to land one of the features for 3.4. IMO still ok to get in. approval 1/2 if docs team agrees. --

Re: meeting?

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:03:54PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Let's say during next week? Vacation. fredp 10× Maybe can make the 10th, not sure. Suggest to meet without me. -- Regards, Olav ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Proposal for ConsoleKit distributor-list announcement

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:34:43PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: Dear release team dudes and Mr.Lennart, Whoah, great feedback! Seems like pretty much everything is arranged. Still, I'd like to send an announcement.. because although it seems like everyone is informed already, best to still send

Proposal for systemd interface reliance

The other announcement. Related to systemd, but not the same. I am right that hostnamed, localed and timedated do not rely on systemd to be running right? = Subject: GNOME 3.4 will rely on hostnamed, localed, timedated D-Bus API

Re: external dependency process

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:03:09PM -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote: The root of the problem is that we lack clear communication with our distributors on when a decision has been taken within GNOME and that there is a lack of sufficient advance warning on these decisions when they do become clear. To

Re: Impact of ConsoleKit deprecation

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:36:46PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: This is regarding the announcement of ConsoleKit deprecation on the distributor-list[1]. Looking at the discussion about this announcement on the release-team mailing list[2], it seems that Lennart and others said there is value

Re: Release assignments, and meeting [Was: GNOME 3.3.1 unstable tarballs due (and more)]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:10:39AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:        Sat 22   Sun 23   Sat 29   Sun 30   Sat 5   Sun 6 Fred      ×        ×        ×        ×        ×       × Andre     -        -        ×        ×        ×       × Javier        -        x        x        x         -

Re: Proposed Freeze Change

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:29:47PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: Le lundi 10 octobre 2011 à 18:17 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit : (...) Consequently the same question goes for String Change Announcement Period - CC'ing gnome-i18n as I'm wondering if translators still consider the String

Re: Using Bugzilla for freeze break requests?

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44:32PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: I think that, at the very least for GNOME 3.4 onwards, we should switch to using a keyword in bugzilla, and the release-team, docs team and i18n teams can monitor newly request breaks, through RSS feeds (the design team does

Re: Using Bugzilla for freeze break requests?

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:57:15AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On 23 September 2011 08:40, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: The Bugzilla way of doing this is to use flags. A flag is either defined for attachments _or_ (not and) bugs. This is possible on our currently bugzilla; we just do

  1   2   >