publishing release notes

Hi, Quick notes about publishing the release notes: /usr/local/www/gnomeweb/git-wd/release-notes-3.26 is correctly created but has /var/cache/gnomeweb/git/release-notes/ has a remote and that clone is not being updated. I just switched the remote to be git://git.gnome.org/release-notes Then

howdy, notes on release notes

Hey, Quick notes about getting release notes published: * this all happens on webapps.gnome.org, with tne gnomeweb user * a git hook is supposed to create ~/git-wd/release-notes-3.24 * it didnt' happen, I just copied over 3.22 to it, ran a git pull and switched branch * once the

Re: GNOME 3.22.1 stable tarballs due

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 12:42 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > > I'll take this one, as my last release. > > Your last release? Are you leaving us? :( Yeah, as lightly announced at GUADEC. Fred _

Re: GNOME 3.22.1 stable tarballs due

Hey, > Tarballs are due on 2016-10-10 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 3.22.1 > stable release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Modules which > were proposed for inclusion should try to follow the unstable schedule > so everyone can test them. Please make sure that your tarballs will > be

[devhelp] Created branch gnome-3-20

The branch 'gnome-3-20' was created pointing to: 904a685... Add Language headers to po files ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[devhelp] Created branch gnome-3-22

The branch 'gnome-3-22' was created pointing to: 6dbf7d7... sidebar: handle finalize with NULL GCompletion ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: ERROR: gsettings-desktop-schemas-3.20.0.tar.xz already exists in the archive!

Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hey, > > I built the tarball and tagged the commits this morning, but it seems > somebody created a tarball locally and didn't push or tag anything, but > pushed it to the archives. > > Could someone look into removing this version from the archives, so I > can push the

Re: Freeze break exception for #771628

Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hi, > > A crasher sneaked in on "unknown" tablets (at least to libwacom): > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771628 > > This causes crashes on gnome-shell startup for the owners of these > tablets, both on x11 and wayland, would be great to push this fix >

Re: Freeze break request for mutter

Hi Florian, Florian Müllner wrote: > I'd like to request (yet another) freeze break for mutter, namely the patch > in > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771549. Ok, first approval. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

Hi Florian, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 17:01 +, Florian Müllner wrote: > > The two remaining patches fix glitches when selecting a hidden window > > - it > > is odd to switch to a window and have it disappear briefly before > > animating > > back in, so I would still

Re: Freeze break request: Network panel "default gateway" fixes

Hi Bastien, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 17:24 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Scattered in a couple of bugs: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771515 > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765969 > >

Re: Code freeze exception for Evolution

Hi Tomas, > I'd like to request a code freeze expection for [0]. Without this > change the email printing in Evolution does not work at all. The patch > was approved by Milan Crha. 1/2. (ideally you'd also fix the typo pointed by Andre in the bug report). Fred

Re: UI freeze exception

Hi, > We have been working on GSoC for batch renaming project for Nautilus. We > just finished on making sure the experience is great and I would like to > ask for a UI freeze exception to include it in the 3.22 release. I'll give the first required approval but it *must* be part of 3.21.91, to

Re: Tablet support status (or, hitting jackpot with freeze break requests)

Carlos Garnacho wrote: > > I want to avoid all risks of regressions in X11 (this means the second > > middle ground option). The thing is I don't want to get tablet users > > in the impossible position of having to pick between working tablet > > support in Wayland and whatever feature or

Re: UI freeze exception

Hi Razvan, Carlos, > I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception for the integration of > compressed files support in Nautilus: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768646, > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770199. > > The main added UI elements are context menu items for

Re: r-t meeting notes (GUADEC 2016, 20160813)

Andre Klapper wrote: > @fredp: Meson support in jhbuild, for gstreamer? There's now some basic support for Meson in jhbuild and it works fine with https://github.com/centricular/gstreamer. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Schedule for releases

Javier Jardón wrote: > Yep, thanks for this, I will go for 3.21.2 and 3.21.92 > > > today 3.21.1 (this week -- Matthias?) > > May 9 3.20.2 > May 23 3.21.2 - Javier > > June 20 3.21.3 - Michael > > July 18 3.21.4 - Michael > > August 15 (at guadec) 3.21.90 > > August 29 3.21.91 --

Re: accidental ABI break

Hi Dan, Dan Winship wrote: > libsoup 2.54.0 accidentally broke ABI (by adding a member to > SoupAuthClass and not removing a padding member to compensate). > (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765222, > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821274) Is there a > preferred way

Re: Freeze break request: Session crashing when triggering visual bell: bug 763858

Hi Jonas, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 09:47 +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > I'd like to merge the patch in > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763858 . The fix itself I > > consider completely safe, and the symptom of not merging it I > > consider > > severe.

Re: Freeze break approval for gnome-software

Hi Richard, > Three commits I'd like to backport to 3.20: > > Fixes a crash when double clicking on a .rpm/.deb/.xdg-app > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-software/commit/?id=f6a9179f5b24d5bf59c478a925c6de95ab108611 > > Actually show an error dialog rather than just closing it automatically:

Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Nibbles

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I'd like to push the Nibbles patches in these i18n bugs: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763905 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763906 > > The first patch adds a few colors ("red" "green" "blue" "yellow" "cyan" > "purple") as new

Re: hard code freeze break request for gnome-clocks

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 07:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > GNOME clocks is one of the applications affected by a change in how > > GTK+ handles window sizes. The change was necessary to provide a > > consistent CSD story, and many applications have been updated to

Re: Freeze break request for gnome-control-center and gnome-desktop

Matthias Clasen wrote: > Since the translators are ok with it, here is +1 of 2 for the release team ditto. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in

Re: Hard code break request for gnome-settings-daemon

Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I have a series of similar patches to fix more possible crashes in: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763689 > > > > They were reviewed by Rui and looked over by Richard. I will also > > cherry-pick those into 3.18. > > The patches all look good to me, and

Re: Hard code break request for gnome-settings-daemon

Hi Richard, > I've fixed a crasher in g-s-d that happens when you start and stop > g-s-d very quickly (which happens in Fedora 24 when gdm's gnome-shell > fails to load). Patches are here: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763382 -- which have all > been reviewed. Latest versions of

Re: [Evolution] Hard code freeze break approval plea

Hi Milan, > I'd like to ask for a hard code freeze break for the evolution, to > include a patch for bug [763631]. It turned out that some change in > gtk+ (3.19.11 is affected, 3.18.6 is not) caused a break in the > evolution's Mail view's Folder->Subscriptions dialog, which could cause >

Welcome to Michael Catanzaro, new team member

Hey Michael, hey all, After Javier poked him on IRC Michael did agree to join the team; thank you Michael, and let's start working together on release tasks. I have subscribed you to the list, and I added you the the release team group on wiki.gnome.org; our central place up there is at

[devhelp] Created branch gnome-3-18

The branch 'gnome-3-18' was created pointing to: 88e6951... Updated Thai translation ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: 3.19.2 - Bijiben

Pierre-Yves Luyten wrote: > Hello, > > Bijiben 3.19.2 has no code change since 3.19.1 ; maybe could we skip this > release (use 3.19.1)? Sure, the point is to get new code out, not just version changes. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: [PATCH] Add GNOME 3.18 limits

Thanks, Applied. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: One last break

Hi Zeeshan, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sorry to bother you again with another freeze break request but I > wanted 3.18 to be great: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754426 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754426#c16 > > Or should this one be a

Re: Freeze exception request for Epiphany

Hi Claudio, hi Michael, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > Hi, > > We need to push a fix for a crasher. Patch is in > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755287 . I'm not sure " // Security implications" will mean much for the future reader but here's a first approval nevertheless.

Re: Freeze exception request for Gedit

Hi Sébastien, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 12:03 +0200, sébastien lafargue wrote: > > The 'close confirmation dialog' for unsaved files is broken, showing > > an empty dialog window. > > I would like to push the fix attached to bug 755294: > >

Re: Second freeze exception request for Epiphany

Hi Michael, > When Epiphany's clear personal data dialog is used to clear saved > passwords, Epiphany deletes only passwords in gnome-keyring saved by > other applications, and never any of the passwords it saved itself. So > it's totally broken and quite destructive; hope you had another copy of

Re: Freeze break request for a11y regression

Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > Yelp has two major regressions in 3.18 due to the port to WebKit2. > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754912 > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753443 > > > >

Re: GNOME Calculator: UI freeze exception request (#707459)

Hi, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > I recently got a fix for GNOME Calculator's bug #707459 that made several > dialogs look way larger than they should have. I assume this was a > regression at some point during some of the changes experienced by Gtk+. > > Matthias Clasen has submitted a patch to fix

Re: [evolution-data-server] Hard code freeze break approval plea

Hi Milan, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 16:09 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755075 > > > > There is a fix available for the evolution-data-server, attached in > > the > > above bug report, which fixes the evolution-data-server side. > > >

Re: Signing apps on Google Play store

Javier Jardón wrote: > Even I understand the Fred concerns, I think r-t is the most > appropriate group to hold the ownership of such account. > And as Cosimo said, we can always drop the apps if the became not > active/unmaintained > I personally do not have any idea about how Android/Google

Re: Late UI change in gnome-weather

Hi Giovanni, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Therefore I don't think there is any risk from this change, but comments are > welcome. If there is no objection, the changes will appear in 3.17.92 next > week. Here's my approval, but do note the game is still to get two approval, no "no objection".

Re: g-c-c 3.17.90 release

Hi Bastien, I'll be on holidays from tomorrow, and there's 1, possibly 2, issues blocking distcheck for gnome-control-center. One of them is this regression in the Printers panel: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753733 and another one with the addition of the 8:30 timezone in

Re: GNOME Foundation AGM 2015

I wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:18:47PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Sure; we'll discuss things beforehand and one of us will be there for five minutes. Awesome. Thanks. I'd appreciate if you update me once you know who I have to chase up in time for the AGM ;-) Just chase

Re: GNOME Foundation AGM 2015

On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:18:47PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Sure; we'll discuss things beforehand and one of us will be there for five minutes. Awesome. Thanks. I'd appreciate if you update me once you know who I have to chase up in time for the AGM ;-) Just chase me. @release

Re: GNOME Foundation AGM 2015

Tobias Mueller wrote: We were thinking that the release-team could and should present at this year's AGM. Could you give a very short presentation (up to five minutes) on what happened last year? Sure; we'll discuss things beforehand and one of us will be there for five minutes.

Re: GNOME 3.17.4 unstable tarballs due

Hey, Tarballs are due on 2015-07-20 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 3.17.4 [...] I'll mostly be on the road next week, who's up for getting this release out? Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

GNOME 3.17.3 released

Hey all, The development of the next GNOME release, 3.17, is going on and a new snapshot, 3.17.3, is now available. Give it a shot! Some of us will gather in San Francisco next week for the West Coast Summit 2015, and a month later we will all gather for GUADEC in Gothenburg, Sweden (no

[devhelp] Created branch gnome-3-16

The branch 'gnome-3-16' was created. Summary of new commits: 33756ee... remove executable bit of po/uk.po ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[devhelp] Created branch gnome-3-14

The branch 'gnome-3-14' was created. Summary of new commits: d60ffbc... remove executable bit of po/uk.po ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GNOME 3.17.3 unstable tarballs due

Tarballs are due on 2015-06-22 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 3.17.3 I started looking at it. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GUADEC Release Team BoF on Mon Aug 10?

Andre Klapper wrote: Who's around? (I'm going to leave on Monday evening hence I'm proposing the first BoF day.) I'll be flying back on the Wednesday, a BoF on Monday is fine. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: 3.18 topics: application revival

Allan Day wrote: 4) A GNOME apps hackfest. 5) A GNOME apps online sprint - come up with a list of bugs and get designs in place. Advertise for volunteers and have people ready to review bugs. I have experimented a bit today[1] and I'd like to add a middle ground to this, with a kind of

Re: 3.17 release schedule

Andre Klapper wrote: I've added the schedule to https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointSeventeen and going to announce final on Monday without further feedback (and create the ical file etc). Looks fine. No Feature proposals stuff in there. I have no idea whether I should create

Re: 3.18 topics: application revival

Matthias Clasen wrote: Maybe we do something to improve this situation, from the release team ? Some ideas I had: 1) Patch review days - ask the community to spend a day focused just on bugs and patches of one app, with the goal of working through the backlog and making visible progress.

Re: Let's not do feature proposals for 3.17.x

Andre Klapper wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 14:37 +, Allan Day wrote: No one's really following the feature proposal process, and it's not doing us any good. When we last discussed this, Matthias said that it would be good to replace the existing process with something that lets

global UI freeze exception for high contrast app icons (?)

Hey, 3.16.0 is out but some applications do not have high contrast app icons yet, or have one but it's not being used for some reasons (it's the case with Videos). https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/HighContrastAppIcons I'd rather like to encourage maintainers to apply the patches

Re: gnome-control-center: Freeze break request for bug 745584

Debarshi Ray wrote: I would like to fix this regression in gnome-control-center's online-accounts panel: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745584 Ok, 1 of 2. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: freeze break request (gdm)

Ray Strode wrote: This isn't really a blocker, per se: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746523 but it's confusing for the user and has near zero risk to fix. Sure. fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Freeze break request for #746112

Carlos Garnacho wrote: Hey all, It would be great to push the patch at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746112 before 3.16. It is no crasher, but reportedly annoying for tablet users. Ack, 1 of 2. Fred ___

Re: Code freeze break request for eog

Matthias Clasen wrote: The fix looks good to me. +1 from me for taking it for .0 Ack, +1. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break request: fixing copy-paste under Wayland

Matthias Clasen wrote: I've been running a Wayland session for the last few days. One of the rougher points of this experience that drove me back to X was that copy-paste didn't work between applications. The following three commits by Carlos fix this:

Re: Network panel bug fixes

Hi Bastien, I found yesterday a number of reference and memory leaks in the Network Settings panel. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746411 Any changes to the leaked objects (connection state, configuration, etc.) could lead to the Settings panel crashing after closing the

Re: gvfs freeze break request

Hi Ondrej, after discussion with Alex on #nautilus I pushed following fix for gvfs Bug 746398: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gvfs/commit/?id=9caf2227a2d710aad3ac7ffb6307bc4ca543c06e Then I realized that there is a freeze already. Could you give me approval backwards? Or should I revert

Re: Hard code freeze break request for bug #746386

Carlos Garnacho wrote: Hey all, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746386 is a crasher that can be triggered fairly easily as soon as you start selecting text around in wayland. I just pushed a fix to gtk+ master (now 3.17.x), would it be ok to cherry-pick it before .0? If the

Re: gnome-shell freeze break request

Ray Strode wrote: Hi guys, A change that went in before 3.15.92 broke the session chooser: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740142 I'd like to revert the changes until we come up with a better solution. Sound good? Ok #. Fred

Re: gnome-terminal freeze break request

Ray Strode wrote: Hi, Currently it's not possible to run X applications from gnome-terminal in a wayland session because gnome-terminal unsets the DISPLAY environment variable. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746359 Patch is pretty small to fix it (Just removes the unset

Re: UI freeze break request for eog

Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Felix Riemann friem...@gnome.org wrote: Hi! This is a really tiny UI freeze break request for Eye of GNOME. While testing the new UI Allan Day found that the margin to the sides of the revamped metadata sidebar are pretty small and

Re: GNOME 3.15.91 beta tarballs due (and more)

* GNOME 3.15.91 beta tarballs due iirc Javier said he could work on this one. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: g-c-c UI freeze break request - bug 743400

Matthias Clasen wrote: I'd like to push the patches in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743400 . There's a screenshot with changes there. Those patches also add new translatable strings for a11y purposes. +1 from me for the release team. I'll point out that this (being able

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

Matthias Clasen wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517 The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition

Re: bijiben 3.15.90

Hi, The NEWS + configure.ac version were updated to match 3.15.90, if build is fine on 3.15.90 env, only distcheck has to run + git tag + scp + ftpadmin install That leaves me with a machine downloading 1940 updates, which would mean make distcheck only tomorrow (now+24hours) ; and only if

bijiben 3.15.90

Hello Pierre-Yves, We're releasing gnome 3.15.90 this week and bijiben doesn't build (API change in evolution); Milan filed a bug and proposed a patch: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744660 Do you have time to look at this? If not, someone from the release team can apply the patch

Re: Leaving the release-team

Hey Alejandro, Finally I would like to thank the team for asking me to join, to the support they provided during this time, and wishing good luck finding new fresh blood for the team Thank you for everything you did, we will make sure to continue the great relation you've helped building with

Re: vte-0.39.90 tarball

Hi Christian, Debarshi Ray wrote: Hey Christian, I don't see a vte-0.39.90 tarball even though you tagged it in Git. Are you planning to upload one? Or should I run make distcheck and upload it? The tarball is still missing; do you want someone to roll it? Fred

Re: late coming features

Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: OK, we have a meeting hopefully either today or tomorrow and I will alert the engagement team regarding this and that we should promote the 3.15.90 release for public consumption. WIth your permission I will post on Reddit and other social media as well so we have a

Re: late coming features

Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: I'm fairly confident that we'll ge the codec install merging done today, but gnome-shell may need an extra day or so to sort out the branches. Given that we've already punted on the notification redesign once, I think we should try to get this in for 3.16.

Re: late coming features

Hi Matthias, Thanks. Lastly, there is the notification redesign that Florian has implemented. This is a major, user-visible change, and _needs_ to go into .90. I'm fairly confident that we'll ge the codec install merging done today, but gnome-shell may need an extra day or so to sort out

Re: GNOME 3.15.90 beta tarballs due (and more)

We would like to inform you about the following: * GNOME 3.15.90 beta tarballs due I will handle this one. Who is up for the next ones? - 3.15.91: March 2nd (Javier?) - 3.15.92: March 16th (me again?) - 3.16.0: March 23rd (Matthias?) Fred

Re: Death of gnome-common

Philip Withnall wrote: I vote for updating the ModernAutotools goal, so that we don’t have conflicting goals. If you think that’s a good idea, I can go ahead and update the page. Sure, go for it. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Death of gnome-common

Hi! Dave and I are planning to kill off gnome-common. The macros from it have been migrated to autoconf-archive[1], and gnome-autogen.sh is mostly irrelevant boilerplate which should be deleted or open-coded in people’s autogen.sh files in the first place. Is it OK if we do this, and

Re: r-t FOSDEM meeting

Andre Klapper wrote: Hi. We need to talk. I'll be at FOSDEM. Who else? And apart from Sunday between 11:30-13:00 I have time. Meeting at the GNOME booth? Saturday 15h? Sure. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

ok to remove seed from modulesets?

Hi, For next week release I wondered about removing seed from the core-deps moduleset, as it's not used anywhere anymore as far as I could tell. Is this fine for everyone? Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: GNOME Sound Recorder vs GNOME Media

Hi Meg, The fact that there is a gnome-sound-recorder which is part of gnome-media and no longer runs, and the new gnome-sound-recorder seems to be causing a lot of confusion. I've seen confusion about it on distro bug reports, bug reports filed against my application, and discussions about

Re: Release Team Meeting: Sunday Nov 23, 19UTC

Let's not wait anymore, only Javier, Matthias and I did complete the doodle, and there's only one time that would work, so I picked it. Sunday, November 23rd, 19UTC Reminder, this is today. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Release Team Meeting: Sunday Nov 23, 19UTC [cancelled]

Frederic Peters wrote: Let's not wait anymore, only Javier, Matthias and I did complete the doodle, and there's only one time that would work, so I picked it. Sunday, November 23rd, 19UTC Reminder, this is today. Andre, Matthias, and I were there but that's not enough for a meeting

Re: Release Team Meeting: Sunday Nov 23, 19UTC

Hi all, So lets try again ;) Let's not wait anymore, only Javier, Matthias and I did complete the doodle, and there's only one time that would work, so I picked it. Sunday, November 23rd, 19UTC Possible agenda: - Release 3.16 schelude assignments - Review 3.16 gnome-target bugs (both

Re: GNOME 3.14.2 stable tarballs due

Tarballs are due on 2014-11-10 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 3.14.2 fwiw I can take care of it. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

libgtop 2.30 missing from git.gnome.org

Hello Robert, It's more than six months ago but it has just been pointed to my attention that the libgtop 2.30.0 doesn't match a commit in GNOME git repository; its NEWS file mentions it is a preview of changes in 2.30.0, not overview of changes in 2.xx like other releases. Could you have a look

release notes: updated git stats

Hey, I have just updated the git numbers for the introduction paragraph of the release notes; unfortunately it will mark the string as fuzzy in translations, sorry about that. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Permission to break hard code freeze - To fix API break for tracker_indexing_tree_new()

Martyn Russell wrote: Hi all, Rico noticed an API break yesterday and I am asking for permission to fix and release this ASAP. The details are in this bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737243 Importantly, there are 2 patches in that bug, the first is the most important,

Re: gnome-photos: Hard code freeze break request

Debarshi Ray wrote: I would like to commit this patch before making the 3.14.0 release: preview-view: Disable the sliding transition https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726505 It merely disables a transition and mostly deletes a few lines of code. ok; 1 of 2. Fred

Re: Another Epiphany freeze break request

Matthias Clasen wrote: I must say that the commit you want to revert doesn't make sense to me anyway - in my opinion, a search provider should launch the application it belongs to, nothing else. So, +1 for the release team from me for reverting it. yeah, 2 of 2. Fred

Re: Freeze(!) break request for polari

Florian Müllner wrote: Hey, I would like to get another freeze break for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732290. The patches in question are reasonably simple and provide a significant performance improvement (in particular with many/large rooms), fixing the most frequent source

Re: GNOME Sudoku freeze break request

Javier Jardón wrote: On 20 September 2014 19:58, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Hi release team, I found a couple of issues with our new Sudoku generation code. This one could be bad when using the print multiple sudokus feature. I haven't seen any problems in practice,

Re: Freeze break: fix bug with Mutter and toolkit window positioning

Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: Would like to push the patches: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736719 The bug they fix is fairly

Re: Freeze break request

Hi Ondrej, I'd like to request freeze break for the Gnome Control Center to allow multiline notifications in the User accounts panel and Region language panel. Notification is shown when user change his/her language and inform about necessity to restart session to apply changes. The patch

Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

Hi Florian, I'd like to request a freeze break for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736910. When opening an empty folder in the app picker, the shell ends up in a confused state - there is no folder popup, but icons are faded out and become non-reactive to clicks as if a folder

Re: UI and hard code freeze break for gnome-software

Kalev Lember wrote: Hi, I would like to ask for approval to break the UI and hard code freezes for gnome-software in order to make it fit on 1024x768 screens. Before and after screenshots attached to the bug report. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735994 Fine, 1 of 2.

Re: Regarding Contacts blocker bug

Matthias Clasen wrote: I just went ahead and tested my patch to rename the search provider ini file on my system: before the change: no search results from contacts after the change: all my friends show up! so, I think we can declare the patch tested and working. And we could consider

Re: Freeze break request: WebKit and Epiphany

Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: So, I'm requesting a freeze break to add the new 2.5.90 release to the jhbuild moduleset. Sure, and 2.6.0 later. (btw I should have reported it, but with 2.5 the web inspector shows strings as LOCALIZED STRING NOT FOUND, do you know if that's also fixed?). But

Re: Freeze break requests for gnome-settings-daemon

Florian Müllner wrote: Ugh, another one of those: I'd like to ask for a freeze break for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736974. In short, sometimes client-side decorated windows use the button layout from the classic session (i.e. minimize, maximize + close rather than just close)

Re: Permission to break hard code freeze - Support giflib-5.1.0

Martyn Russell wrote: Hi all, Javier commented on this bug for GNOME 3.14 and I'm formally asking for permission to release with the patch attached: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734351 Great; with Javier initial approval, consider this the second one. Fred

  1   2   3   >