On Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:44:45 David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:52:14 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> > > Le Monday 17 March 2008 12:36:17 pm Carlo, vous avez écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I've added the emoticons kcm to kdereview
On 21.03.08 16:43:16, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Divendres 21 Març 2008, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
> > On 21.03.08 13:46:24, David Faure wrote:
> > > On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > > without hunting on project pages for the latest release that works with
> > > > a specific
A Divendres 21 Març 2008, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
> On 21.03.08 13:46:24, David Faure wrote:
> > On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > without hunting on project pages for the latest release that works with
> > > a specific KDE version.
> >
> > Does this mean that those libs in k
On 21.03.08 13:46:24, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > without hunting on project pages for the latest release that works with
> > a specific KDE version.
>
> Does this mean that those libs in kdesupport are making incompatible changes
> !??
>
> Sorry, I did
On Friday 21 March 2008, Andras Mantia wrote:
> without hunting on project pages for the latest release that works with
> a specific KDE version.
Does this mean that those libs in kdesupport are making incompatible changes !??
Sorry, I didn't follow the kde-devel thread -- but if the latest versi
Hi,
as of now, kdesupport is not branched (except for 3.5), nor it is
tagged. This can cause confusion as see on this thread:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=120587525306937&w=2
I'd like to propose either tagging a version of kdesupport with each
KDE release (tagging a version that is kno
