Re: KDE Frameworks 5 TP1 tarballs

2014-01-06 Thread Nicolas Lécureuil
Le mardi 7 janvier 2014 00:04:00 Kevin Kofler a écrit : > On Monday 06 January 2014 at 16:54:13, Allen Winter wrote: > > rename then to kconfig_compiler5, kmailservice5, ktelnetservice5 ... ? > > +1 to that! > > Otherwise we have to do that at distro level in Fedora (see e.g. the patch > we're ap

Re: KDE Frameworks 5 TP1 tarballs

2014-01-06 Thread šumski
On Monday 06 of January 2014 16:54:13 Allen Winter wrote: > rename then to kconfig_compiler5, kmailservice5, ktelnetservice5 ... ? Sounds good to me - as Kevin noted, would be much better to do that upstream, then to see all distros carry the same patches before the first release is even made ;-

Re: [kde-release-team] Re: KDE Frameworks 5 TP1 tarballs

2014-01-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 08:43:14PM +0100, šumski wrote: > On Sunday 05 of January 2014 12:40:05 David Faure wrote: > ... > > You can find it in kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-kf5-qt5, attached here > > for convenience. > > Great, just a few questions ;-) > 1) Is it expected that extra-cmake-mo

Re: KDE Frameworks 5 TP1 tarballs

2014-01-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
On Monday 06 January 2014 at 16:54:13, Allen Winter wrote: > rename then to kconfig_compiler5, kmailservice5, ktelnetservice5 ... ? +1 to that! Otherwise we have to do that at distro level in Fedora (see e.g. the patch we're applying to kdelibs 4) and we don't like having to do that. Ke

Re: 4.13 proposed schedule

2014-01-06 Thread Allen Winter
On Monday, December 30, 2013 04:26:55 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, Mario and me have created a tentative schedule for 4.13 > > We both think that the 4 months schedule has worked pretty well so 4.13 is > basically 4.12 + 4 months but without .4 and .5 because they'd overlap with a > po

Re: KDE Frameworks 5 TP1 tarballs

2014-01-06 Thread Allen Winter
On Sunday, January 05, 2014 08:43:14 PM šumski wrote: > On Sunday 05 of January 2014 12:40:05 David Faure wrote: > ... > > You can find it in kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-kf5-qt5, attached here > > for convenience. > > Great, just a few questions ;-) > 1) Is it expected that extra-cmake-modu