FYI.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle
Date: Sunday 27 April 2014, 11:51:01
From: Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org
To: kde-frameworks-de...@kde.org
CC: kde-core-de...@kde.org
Hello people,
As you may have noticed, we're covering quite a few tasks here
El Diumenge, 27 d'abril de 2014, a les 15:15:32, David Faure va escriure:
FYI.
Interesting fact here that original the mail was just sent to k-f-d and k-c-d.
I am seeing similar patterns in the plasma land, where they went their own way
with the releasing discussion and only sent to this list
On Sunday 27 April 2014 15:55:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Interesting fact here that original the mail was just sent to k-f-d and
k-c-d.
That was my suggestion, to avoid cross-posting to 4 lists everytime someone
answers, which always creates issues because kde-packager@ is moderated.
I am
I am not blaming anyone. I'm just raising the question if this list may have
lost its usefulness or may need repurposing.
Please do not see complains where the is none.
Cheers,
Albert
Enviat des del meu telèfon intel·ligent BlackBerry 10.
Missatge original
De: David Faure
Enviat:
Longer answer now that i'm no longer on the move :)
El Diumenge, 27 d'abril de 2014, a les 16:09:27, David Faure va escriure:
On Sunday 27 April 2014 15:55:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Interesting fact here that original the mail was just sent to k-f-d and
k-c-d.
That was my suggestion, to
On Sunday 27 April 2014 17:14:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
i'm just stating that both schedules
were discussed outside this list
Ah, sorry, now I understand better the purpose of your email.
Well, it is often the case that discussions that normally happen on mailing-
lists, happen differently
El Divendres, 25 d'abril de 2014, a les 09:22:13, Kurt Hindenburg va escriure:
On 4/24/14, 4:26 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
You mean
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=sysadmin%2Frelease-tools.gita=treeh=2d9de02f
ffec6248ec5fd072330d63fdfcfee039hb=c40c5ef92d8444d51d3411ff5c2677c75ee45b
On Sunday 27 April 2014 17:14:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
my comment was if the release-team mailing list still makes sense or
not.
not considering the discussion of the schedule: I think we need the mailing
list as it's the only place where we have maintainers, release managers and
