tellico in kdeview to the kde-core-devel mailing
list.
Allen Winter wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2009 4:44:51 pm Robby Stephenson wrote:
Hi,
I just moved Tellico from KDE playgorund into kdereview. Based on
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Guidelines I wasn't sure if any i18n
On Saturday 02 May 2009 5:33:29 am Thiago Macieira wrote:
Hi
I was trying to build kdereview/mplayerthumbs and it requires Phonon 4.4
(i.e., the trunk/kdesupport version), which is still unreleased. However,
I don't see any checks for the version number anywhere.
FindPhonon.cmake does
in your kde app
then. Not only because of SIC and BIC (which would be expected anyway
until it's released) but because it will even go away once libkformula is
done...
Agree with David.
--
Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339
KDAB, Inc. | Platform-independent software solutions
http
On Monday 16 March 2009 5:33:38 pm you wrote:
Jeff Mitchell wrote:
Allen Winter wrote:
Redirecting to the release team...
On Monday 16 March 2009 9:51:55 am Jeff Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
We Amarok people have split out our Taglib plugins into something
standalone for a couple reasons
to go there, but I won't object
if someone claims maintainership there.
??
--
Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339
KDAB, Inc. | Platform-independent software solutions
http://kdab.com | 1-866-777-5322 (US) | +46-563-540090 (Sweden
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 8:44:36 am C. Boemann wrote:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: icon packaging
Date: Tuesday 17 February 2009
From: C. Boemann c...@boemann.dk
To: kde-packa...@kde.org, kde-release-t...@kde.org, a...@oxygen-icons.org
Hi
[cross posting a
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 3:56:05 pm C. Boemann wrote:
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 21:28:16 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
well that is just the physical place. My point is that we don't want
to be tied in with kde releases, and so I think it would be better
if it is placed in say
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 7:43:10 am Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
For trunk, I plan to increase the minimum version requirement
for the Libcal package from 0.33 to 0.42. Else the kdepimlibs
module will no longer build for you.
If your distribution does not provide version 0.42 (or higher
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 4:01:36 am Legolas wrote:
Hello,
Could someone help me with the move of /playground/games/ktron to
/kdereview/ktron with inclusion of l10n and docs?
Maybe the kdegames modules coordinator will help you.
Matt Williams? still alive? hope so :)
On Sunday 08 February 2009 9:34:20 am Pino Toscano wrote:
Hi,
At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
revision released of 4.2?
Given that almost two weeks after KDE 4.2.0 are passed, it would be nice to
schedule at least 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 to plan
Howdy,
For trunk, I plan to increase the minimum version requirement
for the Libcal package from 0.33 to 0.42. Else the kdepimlibs
module will no longer build for you.
If your distribution does not provide version 0.42 (or higher)
then you will need to install it yourself from source, which can
Dirk,
Sorry about this.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper v...@movingparts.net
Date: Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: branches/KDE/4.2/kdepim/kpilot/conduits/akonadibase
To: KDE release coordination release-team@kde.org
My apologies if I'm wrong in
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 6:30:10 pm Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2009, Allen Winter wrote:
I guess we are still on track for 4.2.0 tagging in the next couple days?
There is the report of 1 possible show-stopper in KMail -- I will
investigate what's happening
Howdy,
I guess we are still on track for 4.2.0 tagging in the next couple days?
There is the report of 1 possible show-stopper in KMail -- I will investigate
what's happening with that.
Dirk, can you send a kde-cvs-announce message reminding people?
-Allen
On Monday 12 January 2009 6:05:57 am David Faure wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2009, Allen Winter wrote:
Btw the RC of Qt 4.5 will be available soon so i guess this is a pretty
good start for the KDE trunk.
Yep, sounds good to me.
Who can import a snapshot?
(is my old upgrade_script.qt
Howdy,
I'd like to start making some more external packages required instead of
optional.
For example, in kdepimlibs I really like to start requiring cyrus-sasl and
openldap.
I think these packages provide basic functionality rather than extra and cool
stuff.
Objections to making sasl and
Posted over from kde-devel.
On Sunday 11 January 2009 5:14:34 pm Alexis Ménard wrote:
Hello KDE folks,
Perhaps some people have noticed that a squad in Qt Software is trying to
track (and fix) all visible bugs as they can to have a perfect KDE 4.2 with
Qt 4.5.
Most visible bugs has been
On Monday 05 January 2009 4:18:46 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
just to let everyone know of the progress:
Today, at 23:59 UTC, KDE 4.1.4 will be tagged from branches/KDE/4.1. Please
make sure that your changes that you want to be part of this release are
backported into that branch. The same
Forwarding to the Release Team.
My opinion on this was to defer to those who know the issues
much better than I. IOW: I'm happy either way.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: PolicyKit-KDE destiny
Date: Friday 19 December 2008
From: Dario Freddi drf54...@gmail.com
To:
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 10:42:55 am Rex Dieter wrote:
kdepim-4.1.85 + akonadi-1.0.80 yields:
kontact(6838)/libakonadi Akonadi::CollectionModelPrivate::listDone: Job
error: The protocol version of the Akonadi server is incompatible.
Make sure you have a compatible version installed.
On Saturday 06 December 2008 4:00:40 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
IMO, we should branch at -rc1, not earlier.
Ok. I was simply trying to find a compromise.
I'm not strongly in favor of early branching.
Bottom Line:
we stick to the current schedules;
branch 4.2 at rc1 (at the earliest);
4.1.4
SVN commit 893005 by winterz:
No longer try to find Opensync or glib2.
This effectively turns-off kitchensync and the akonadi opensync plugin
and removes both from KDE4.2.
We can try to restore these for KDE4.3, if we think opensync 0.40 will be ready
CCMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Thursday 27 November 2008 8:19:01 am Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
We are nearing the KDE 4.2 Beta2 tagging in less than 2 weeks (9 Dec).
If Opensync 0.40 is not available a few days before that time, then we'll
have no choice but to disable Kitchensync and the Akonadi Opensync plugin
from
On Thursday 27 November 2008 6:21:54 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2008 14:19:01 Allen Winter wrote:
We are nearing the KDE 4.2 Beta2 tagging in less than 2 weeks (9 Dec).
If Opensync 0.40 is not available a few days before that time, then we'll
have no choice
Howdy,
We are nearing the KDE 4.2 Beta2 tagging in less than 2 weeks (9 Dec).
If Opensync 0.40 is not available a few days before that time, then we'll have
no choice
but to disable Kitchensync and the Akonadi Opensync plugin from KDE 4.2.
See [1]
Can anyone provide a status update on
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 5:14:17 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
Unless there are objections, I'd like to go ahead with this new plan.
I would object unless BC/API has been reviewed
Glad we procrastinated then.
Let's discuss this issue later
On Monday 17 November 2008 7:48:25 am Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2008 13:24:13 Dirk Mueller wrote:
I think it should be moved to kdereview and we should target the decision
about inclusion with Beta2.
Definitely my preferred way of handling it. So +1 from me.
No objections
On Saturday 15 November 2008 9:28:26 pm Trever Fischer wrote:
Hi, I'm Trever, one of the 4 or so of us working on PolicyKit-KDE. For the
most part, it is as feature-complete as we planned for the 4.2 release, but
it
is still in playground. We'd like to request an exemption to the normal
Adding the Release Team to this discussion.
On Thursday 13 November 2008 8:40:09 am Torsten Rahn wrote:
Hi Allen,
I know we are a bit late, but we'd like to move the library
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/network/decibel-kde/
over into kdereview for inclusion with KDE 4.2
On Friday 07 November 2008 3:43:43 pm David Faure wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Divendres 07 Novembre 2008, Tom Albers va escriure:
Op vrijdag 07 november 2008 00:50 schreef u:
A Divendres 07 Novembre 2008, Allen Winter va escriure:
Howdy
Howdy,
Would it be possible to relax the licensing requirements in kdepimlibs to
permit GPL code?
Currently, kdepimlibs requirements are the same as kdelibs; i.e. only LGPL,
BSD, X11.
There are at least 4 GPL libraries in kdepim (libkholidays, libksieve, kdgantt,
libkleo) that
would be very
Howdy,
I started the Release Critical Upstream Issues for the 4.2 Release [1]
If you know any such issues, please add them to the page (or send them to me).
We need to start pushing hard any 4.2 blockers.
[1]
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Upstream_Issues
Howdy,
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also, please send me any 4.3 Goals that you have.
* KDevelop and KDevplatform modules
^^ late, but will sorta be part of 4.2. right?
* Decibel VOIP and real-time communication
On Sunday 02 November 2008 4:12:29 pm Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:29:23 Allen Winter wrote:
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also, please send me any 4.3 Goals that you have.
Release Goals
On Thursday 30 October 2008 7:35:25 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Today we are supposed to get the tagging of 4.1.3 and techbase says there
are no more planned 4.1.x releases, should i instruct translators to start
focusing on trunk? Or are
On Thursday 30 October 2008 2:11:24 pm Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Thursday 30 October 2008 18:52:03 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 30 October 2008 7:35:25 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Today we are supposed to get the tagging of 4.1.3
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 6:09:39 pm Tom Albers wrote:
At Wednesday 29 October 2008 23:05, you wrote:
Today we are supposed to get the tagging of 4.1.3 and techbase says there
are
no more planned 4.1.x releases, should i instruct translators to start
focusing on trunk? Or are we
Howdy,
Just curious.. the release schedule says we have an Alpha tagging on 21 Oct.
Still planned?
I recall some discussions about Alpha vs. regular weekly snapshot.
And if Alphas really made sense anymore.
I don't remember what was decided.
-Allen
On Friday 17 October 2008 3:14:55 am Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
figured out that this can be interesting for people here too.
Last I checked we still don't have a kdeartwork module coordinator.
So I guess as long as the artists don't complain, then go for it!
-Riccardo
-- Forwarded
On Friday 17 October 2008 12:51:47 pm Harald Sitter wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 18:25:20 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 14:47:34 Allen Winter wrote:
Last I checked we still don't have a kdeartwork module coordinator.
So I guess as long as the artists don't
On Friday 17 October 2008 12:51:47 pm Harald Sitter wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 18:25:20 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 14:47:34 Allen Winter wrote:
Last I checked we still don't have a kdeartwork module coordinator.
So I guess as long as the artists don't
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 8:55:26 am Stefan Majewsky wrote:
On Mittwoch 15 Oktober 2008 14:40:44 Allen Winter wrote:
Yep, as long as the kdegames module coordinator approves
That might be problematic. Matt Williams has not been seen for months.
I guess we need a volunteer then, at least
On Sunday 28 September 2008 06:48:51 Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
I think we have come to a conclusion, but not to a descision. Let's try to
change that. Below you find the proposal based on the various mails to this
list. I will wait untill there are a few supporters for this proposal, before
On Friday 26 September 2008 17:27:28 Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi
Some of you do probably not know me, while others do. I'm one of your
friendly
debian packagers. (Occasionally, I'm also one of your unfriendly debian
packagers, but that's hopefully rare)
When looking at 4.1.2 which is
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 10:58:13 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
I tried sending one release announcement to kde-cvs-announce.
Where it waited in moderation and never saw the light of day.
Not true, the mailing list is regularly moderated
Howdy,
I want to let everyone know that I am now employed by KDAB.
I am not currently assigned any specific KDE development tasks,
but that could change in the future.
This new job will definitely impact the amount of time I have for KDE.
I plan to continue as the kdepim module coordinator, and
On Friday 05 September 2008 22:44:16 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2008 15:01:48 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2008 05:59:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kdepim
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 19:06:36 you wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
development branch of Eigen be a place where we can experiment and
break stuff without affecting our users. So, I support your plan.
There seems to be another set of kdesupport developers
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:27:15 Dominik Haumann wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
I think we do a terrible job of keeping the community informed about
approaching milestones.
Let's brainstorm about ways we can provide consistent, timely
reminders
Howdy,
I think we do a terrible job of keeping the community informed about
approaching milestones.
Let's brainstorm about ways we can provide consistent, timely reminders/nags.
The KDE community should except on-time notifications in a known set of
channels.
What channels? Currently we
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 16:04:46 Tom Albers wrote:
At Monday 08 September 2008 20:25, you wrote:
We need to improve communication. But also the discussion in this room. The
change to the 4.2 schedule was announced pretty clear on this mailinglist,
but got no feedback at all. After
On Monday 08 September 2008 12:42:59 Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
In rescheduling the 4.2 release, it seems we missed the fact that by moving
the schedule forward, we can no longer depend on Qt 4.5. I wonder if that is
the right thing to do. What would be the disadvantage to revert this change
On Monday 08 September 2008 14:25:20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
some questions i'd suggest asking ourselves (please add your own as well):
* what has the 6 month cycle won us in terms of real benefit thus far?
For me, there is a real benefit in having a regular cycle.
I won't argue here if 6
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 10:01:48 Benoit Jacob wrote:
Hi,
I just found out these discussions on the release-team list, to which I was
not
subscribed:
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2008-August/002395.html
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2008-August/002433.html
On Thursday 28 August 2008 14:30:14 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I've just finished uploading the first try of KDE 4.1.1 packages. I have no
interesting news, please report any issues with them to me, or if there are
important bugreports about it, tag them with the kde-4.1.1-blocker keyword
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 06:01:34 Mark Constable wrote:
On 2008-08-26, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
That's correct. And if someone complains we can say that you are using a
development version of Foo which is not supported in KDE yet. please
remove that version and use the one from your
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 11:54:34 Cyrille Berger wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
So maybe they need put up a website with tarballs. Or maybe
they need to tells to use the version in branch. Or maybe their
API matures over the years and it doesn't become such a big
Howdy,
If you are a developer of a kdesupport project, please make sure
that your latest-and-greatest stable version is tagged
in our subversion tags repository.
The lastest-and-greatest stable version should be the version
that we need to use when building trunk.
If you need help with this,
On Monday 25 August 2008 06:57:18 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
I think we need to treat kdesupport libs just like any other external
dependency.
The suggestion you describe is already our policy.
Ok, good to know.
Let's please start being stricter
On Monday 25 August 2008 06:45:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
KDE 4.1.1 tagging planned for Thursday morning (this week). I'd like to
announce the usual wednesday 23:59 UTC rule and in light of the new bugzilla,
I would like to use the kde-4.1.1-blocker keyword for tagging bugs that
have
On Monday 25 August 2008 08:35:02 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
while it might be best to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also
realistic that there will be those who remain interested in KDE3 for
various reasons and there's no reason to try and
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:52:57 Tom Albers wrote:
Op zaterdag 23 augustus 2008 01:18 schreef u:
Howdy,
The recent build problems in our kdesupport package dependencies
needs to be addressed.
I think we need to treat kdesupport libs just like any other external
dependency.
On Sunday 24 August 2008 06:26:12 Tom Albers wrote:
Op zondag 24 augustus 2008 06:30 schreef u:
Hi all,
I'm writing to ask for permission to add the KDE Asciiquarium screensaver
to
kde-artwork, available from http://purinchu.net/software/asciiquarium.php
and
in
On Sunday 24 August 2008 10:16:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dissabte 23 Agost 2008, Allen Winter va escriure:
Howdy,
The recent build problems in our kdesupport package dependencies
needs to be addressed.
I think we need to treat kdesupport libs just like any other external
Howdy,
The recent build problems in our kdesupport package dependencies
needs to be addressed.
I think we need to treat kdesupport libs just like any other external
dependency.
Something like the following guidelines:
No KDE code (in trunk) changes should be necessary until:
- a real release
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:45:33 Stephan Kulow wrote:
To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to fix
two modules to even compile before I could tag it and I have _heavy_ doubts
about the testing that the branch sees. And the less it's used, the more
likely
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 17:58:29 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Hi,
should we get some more structure into Playground? I fear it will otherwise
end in the state kdenonbeta has been before if it isn't already: Lot's of
started projects, but most of them dead code, making people
On Monday 28 July 2008 05:53:25 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sunday 27 July 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
We need to plan the 4.1.x schedule. There have been some translation team
leaders asking me if it was worth translating stable branch as no 4.1.x
release was annouced on
Howdy,
I published an initial version of the schedule we discussed the past few days.
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Release_Schedule
Please review.
-Allen
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 11:41:11 Tom Albers wrote:
Op woensdag 16 juli 2008 15:12 schreef u:
I think we should keep the same schedule from 4.1,
You totally ignore my proposal. Please respond to that thread.
Sorry, I didn't mean to give that impression.
I took into account Dirk's
On Monday 21 July 2008 09:24:04 Rex Dieter wrote:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
Anyone around who has more eyes and ears open and can bring in some show
stoppers or critical/annoying bugs we have to fix before 4.1?
One of the critical/annoying kind:
* okular: print pdf produces no output, also
Howdy,
Apparently KOrn is badly broken and we don't have the time or people
to work on it in the next 2 days.
So, I'm going to disable KOrn from the kdepim build.
Same situation as KPilot and KMobileTools.
Sorry for the late notice, but nobody has really tested KOrn until today.
Regards,
Allen
On Thursday 17 July 2008 18:43:10 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2008 05:40:48 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Anyone around who has more eyes and ears open and can bring in some show
stoppers or critical/annoying bugs we have to fix before 4.1?
The big showstopper in kdepim
On Friday 18 July 2008 04:58:46 Pavel Volkovitskiy wrote:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Anyone around who has more eyes and ears open and can bring in some show
stoppers or critical/annoying bugs we have to fix before 4.1?
(is there a techbase site about this that I cannot find?)
On Thursday 17 July 2008 05:40:48 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Anyone around who has more eyes and ears open and can bring in some show
stoppers or critical/annoying bugs we have to fix before 4.1?
The big showstopper in kdepim currently is missing original text in reply a
message
On Monday 16 June 2008 12:12:08 Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
As we are approaching the final 4.1 release, I think we can think about the
schedule for 4.2 a bit and brainstorm about what we like and don't like. To
kick off the discussion, let me throw some ideas around.
Because we became a
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 07:47:43 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
both sound find to me. Is any of those good enough for being decided upon
*today*?
If I had to choose, I'd go for plasma-addons.
that's fine with me.
Honestly, I think renaming
Release Team,
KMail has a nasty IMAP-mail-eating bug.
We need more time to fix it.
This is a showstopper in kdepim.
I'd rather not have an RC with a known grave dataloss bug.
Can we delay the tagging a few days?
___
release-team mailing list
KMail has a nasty IMAP-mail-eating bug.
We need more time to fix it.
This is a showstopper in kdepim.
I'd rather not have an RC with a known grave dataloss bug.
Can we delay the tagging a few days?
Forgot to mention:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166077
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:02:57 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
This is a showstopper in kdepim.
I'd rather not have an RC with a known grave dataloss bug.
Can we delay the tagging a few days?
How long is a few? The description doesn't sound like
On Wednesday 02 July 2008 13:30:09 Urs Wolfer wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 19:32:37 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:50:05AM -0400, Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Just a friendly reminder that we have the RC1 tagging in 1 week (8 July).
Please let's concentrate
On Friday 27 June 2008 08:18:22 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
I asked the packagers the last days and there seems to be still high
interest in the KDE 3.5 branch.
4 months have passed by now since 3.5.9 release and I would give it
after KDE 4.1 and then release 3.5.10 mid of august. What do
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 16:04:25 Stefan Böhmann wrote:
Hi,
I tried to get an overview about the current state of each application in
kdetoys and want to share my cognitions and also I want to make a proposal.
In short: I think the kdetoys module is dead.
Where are we on this initiative?
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 08:07:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
Word is that Dirk is on holiday, is anyone able to do the tagging and
tars for KDE 4.1 beta 2 itself?
I was on holidays the last two days and didn't have time for KDE, I'll catch
Dear Translators and Release Team,
The kde-pim team would like to merge the Kleopatra enterprise branch
from the Kolab Konsortium [1] into trunk for the upcoming 4.1 release.
This will provide a much better kde-pim experience in 4.1 -- it will provide
many bugfixes as well as the Kleopatra
On Monday 16 June 2008 11:17:34 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
Dear Translators and Release Team,
The kde-pim team would like to merge the Kleopatra enterprise branch
from the Kolab Konsortium [1] into trunk for the upcoming 4.1 release.
please excuse
On Thursday 12 June 2008 08:07:07 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:03:38 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 09 May 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
So, we really need amor, for very selfish reasons like keeping mom
happy.
Maybe move it to kdebase. It is an essential part of
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 05:09:22 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
IMO, that grants an exemption. Bindings are just special. :)
+1
They should be able to work on it up to the actual release.
So in effect its just supposed to be a bindings are not affected by
On Thursday 22 May 2008 00:01:21 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 08:29:24 am Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Um.. .we forgot to put in a separate milestone for Doc/Handbook changes.
Unless there are objections, I'd like to create one for 3 June 2008.
This gives another 2
Howdy,
FYI:
I created a new page for 4.2 Goals [1]
I also clean-up the 4.1 Goals [2]
Please review and update as necessary.
In particular, I am still unsure about the status of:
GStreamer, Quicktime, DirectShow9 Phonon backends
Apple dashboard widgets support in Plasma
GetHotNewStuff2 /
Howdy,
Um.. .we forgot to put in a separate milestone for Doc/Handbook changes.
Unless there are objections, I'd like to create one for 3 June 2008.
This gives another 2 weeks for creating content.
Then we have about 6 weeks for translations before RC1 is tagged.
-Allen
Howdy,
To avoid future confusion, rdale and I have added a new milestone
to the 4.1 Release Plan [1] specifying a milestone for a bindings freeze:
8 July: No new additions to the language bindings, except optional bindings
as permitting by the kde-bindings team.
This is also the date of the
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 11:28:42 Richard A. Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
| Howdy,
|
| Um.. .we forgot to put in a separate milestone for Doc/Handbook changes.
|
| Unless there are objections, I'd like to create one for 3 June 2008.
That means we better get
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 06:07:12 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sunday 18 May 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
We discussed this earlier. Can we move extragear/plasma to a new kde main
module kdeplasmoids (or some other name) ?
isn't there at least one plasmoid in there that is supposed to work? nobody
says
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 08:34:28 Allen Winter wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 08:10:45 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 13:50:22 Dirk Mueller wrote:
so I would propose to move it 2 days earlier (May 28th). is that a
problem anywhere?
I'll be at Linuxtag as well and would
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 17:58:15 Will Stephenson wrote:
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 22:47:45 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 10:23:30 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:54:32 you wrote
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 08:10:45 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 13:50:22 Dirk Mueller wrote:
so I would propose to move it 2 days earlier (May 28th). is that a
problem anywhere?
I'll be at Linuxtag as well and would prefer the release to be the week
after (the Wednesday
Howdy,
Any objection to moving KJots from kdeutils into kdepim?
The kjots.desktop file even puts itself into the PIM Utilities category.
One big reason to do this is so kjots can be embedded into Kontact.
___
release-team mailing list
FYI:
I added the following milestones to the 4.0 Release Schedule [1]
30 May 2008 (Friday): Tagging 4.0.5
6 June 2008 (Friday): Releasing 4.0.5
Please advise if these aren't good dates.
[1]
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Schedule
On Monday 05 May 2008 08:17:26 Cyrille Berger wrote:
Hi,
Just to inform you that Boudewijn has decided to step down from beeing
release coordinator for KOffice, and that I will be replacing him.
Thanks for taking over.
Please put your name on the koffice row in
201 - 300 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
