On Saturday 17 September 2016 08:22:20 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> From their perspective their distribution shipped them Applications
> 15.10 (as that will be what the release notes say) yet when they got
> to report a bug they won't find those version numbers.
This argument is flawed. It ignores that
On Saturday 25 June 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 14:13:01 Ian Monroe wrote:
I'm thinking we should have a KDE Git transition BoF. One thought
is that the Git BoF happen after the release team BoF so that they
can be given the opportunity to add stuff to our
On Friday 01 October 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Hello,
as you probably know, the theory is that KDE libraries keep
backwards binary compatibility. As you might or might not know, that
is the theory.
I've found a tool called abi-compliance-checker
On Friday 14 May 2010, Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy All,
I regret to inform everyone that kdepim will not be ready for a 4.5
Beta1 that is scheduled to happen in a few days.
We estimate an extra month will be needed.
Unfortunately, the massive porting effort to Akonadi (an even bigger
job
On Friday 05 February 2010, Thomas McGuire wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 04 February 2010 21:58:46 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 01 February 2010 14:29:52 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211128
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
Bug 96 exists
