do (2) today evening.
Could we possibly delay the release or maybe release a bug fix version of Baloo?
--
Vishesh Handa
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:44 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Monday 05 October 2015 11:38:40 David Faure wrote:
>> Dear packagers,
>>
&
of this.
- Vishesh Handa
On Oct. 9, 2015, 5:54 p.m., Xuetian Weng wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Vishesh Handa <m...@vhanda.in> wrote:
> Hello
>
> We seem to have discovered 2 problems in Baloo.
>
> 1. Kioslave broken - https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/
> 2. The database got corrupted because of faulty code. This was
--
>
> (Updated Oct. 9, 2015, 6:57 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Baloo, Release Team and Vishesh Handa.
>
>
> Repository: baloo
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> The bug is obvious, old code uses limit instead of (limit > 0), which
&g
Yes.
I emailed kde-frameworks yesterday. Lets wait Akademy is over, and
then move them?
Vishesh Handa
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote:
Should baloo and kfilemetadata be moving from Plasma to frameworks about now?
Jonathan
Git commit 49fecea8e218ce03b01073c1604cfc0b683b1cc5 by Vishesh Handa.
Committed on 18/05/2015 at 14:33.
Pushed by vhanda into branch 'master'.
Disable compiling the Baloo Daemon without inotify
Baloo requires inotify. It's a hard dependency for us. When we do not
have it, we connect to kio
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
plasma-de...@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
On Feb 28, 2015 12:39 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Divendres, 27 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:04:57, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
wrote:
What needs to be done to release the KF5 based version of dolphin
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
I was told that Baloo and KFileMetadata were going to be part of the
Frameworks 5.6, I had assumed that the relevant people were making that
happen.
As a Plasma maintainer, I was counting on it being there as we have a
, and nothing else in the SC uses it.
I don't think we should be release them any more.
If someone wants them they can continue using the 4.14 versions. Nepomuk
hasn't changed since 4.12.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
Hello people.
Albert and I just discussed this, but I'm just replying so that everyone
knows -
Baloo/Baloo-widgets/KFileMetaData will not be getting any more updates for
KDE4.
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
Hey everyone
I'm going to be merging the frameworks branch of Baloo and KFileMetaData
into master soon. Additionally, the PIM parts of Baloo are going to split
up into a separate repository called 'akonadi-search'.
This is just a heads app in case anyone has any objections.
--
Vishesh Handa
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
So KDE 4.14 will be the last 4.x baloo release, correct?
Yes.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dijous, 24 de juliol de 2014, a les 22:58:20, Luigi Toscano va escriure:
Dear release team,
I have two open review which (if approved) I would like to push to
KDE/4.14
(then merged to master, and forward-ported to
anywhere.
Doesn't matter.
2. Do not ship the module for 4.14. It's not used anywhere, so we can do
that.
I would prefer doing (1). If there are no objections I'll commit the patch.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dissabte, 12 de juliol de 2014, a les 20:11:35, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
wrote:
El Dissabte, 12 de juliol de 2014, a les 17:24:30, Albert Astals
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dissabte, 12 de juliol de 2014, a les 17:24:30, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
Note that baloo unit tests are not passing and if it's not fixed (+
package
respun) before tuesday it won't be part of the release.
I
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2014-06-27, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
This question is still open. We're releasing kauth as part of KF5 but
polkit-qt-1 isn't getting released.
Is there any maintainer for polkit-qt-1?
For that matter,
test it and catch regressions, after that I start
focusing on master and try my best NOT to backport any patches. They just
don't get tested.
Also, maybe you guys test out Kwin, but I've rarely (if ever) gotten reports
about the PIM side of searching. There is a LOT to test.
--
Vishesh Handa
,
it might make sense to change it.
The second is a minor crash fix which affects krunner.
commit 798fbc52bbc5f5b8d1635eac90340e6f3aa6c374
vlap:~/kde/src/baloo $ gl -p .
commit 3fbb3df42f619f57d390327cf56da4120d9e4ed2
Author: Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in
Date: Sat Apr 12 19:17:09 2014 +0200
system, etc). Also there is code to figure out why it is crashing and blacklist
that file.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
for this?
I'm not too inclined on trying to fix it considering that there have been no
changes in Nepomuk for 4.13
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
in the CMake logic.
I've pushed a commit. That should hopefully fix it.
Could you perhaps add some hook to email me about these failures? We don't
have a dedicated mailing list for Baloo and I'm not sure if notifying kde-
devel would be a good idea.
--
Vishesh Handa
. This is not something we want to do.
@Release team:
Do you think I should explicitly block 6.1.7 on a Nepomuk level? I
would just need to revert 0e01d5b5 from nepomuk-core.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
of times.
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
backing up a number of times.
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
services/storage/backup/resourcelistgenerator.cpp 059bfa7
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111949/diff/
Testing
---
Tested by manually backing up a number of times.
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team
/backuptests.cpp 7284dd6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111947/diff/
Testing
---
Tested by manually backing up a number of times.
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release
(in the
case they are filtered by default)
If no one has any objections then I can create the class and make
dolphin use it when it is compiled with Nepomuk. Otherwise we can just
let these bugs stay till 4.12.
--
Vishesh Handa
[1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316334
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 26 de juny de 2013, a les 19:33:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey guys
I know I've already asked my fair share of exceptions, but this one is
just to fix some bugs [1]
With the 4.10 release we moved
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Divendres, 21 de juny de 2013, a les 03:44:07, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2013-06-20, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
So let's please
process, and even in the worst case if the code is horrible
(which it isn't) and crashes, the user will face no problems. It will
just be as though these indexers do not exist.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Mario Fux KDE ML kde...@unormal.org wrote:
Am Donnerstag 20 Juni 2013, 14.51:38 schrieb Vishesh Handa:
Hey guys
Morning
I wanted Nepomuk to have some ebook indexers for this release, but I
never got around to implementing them. I was hoping someone else
mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
, just
implements the same optional Nepomuk features using Nepomuk2 which is
actively maintained and improved. I'm CCing Lukas Appelhans, the
maintainer of KGet (who agrees with introducing this dependency) and
Vishesh Handa who is maintaining Nepomuk2.
I am open to any questions
/Release_Team
Thanks. Added my name.
all good stuff
-Allen
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
scheduling.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 28 de maig de 2013, a les 00:20:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey guys
Hi there,
I seem to have missed the soft feature freeze by a day and added my
feature
list a day later (23rd instead of 22nd
into KDE/4.10
4.10.3 can now be tagged
Once that has been done, I can go ahead and unfreeze the repository -
and we can package it for release.
Regards,
Ben
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
/listinfo/release-team
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 03 May 2013 20.51.58 Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 03 May 2013 20.26.58 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick notice that due
, this behaviour was never advertised.
Opinions?
[1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/45163
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
, it has caused a lot of strife between the
developers.
Yes, but for me the issue is resolved now (except for the build
system), so I'm looking forward to a fruitful collaboration in the
future.
Great. Cause we have lots to do.
--
Vishesh Handa
and get
everything in well before the release date. This entire process of getting
in the new widget has been fairly eventful, and while it might be an
improvement for the users, it has caused a lot of strife between the
developers.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
Nepomuk mailing list
nepo...@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
deprecated Nepomuk code and the KFileMetadataWidget. I
rather focus on other things.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
--
Vishesh Handa
dolphin-nepomuk-widgets.patch
Description: Binary data
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 16:27:17 Vishesh Handa wrote:
So, may I merge my patch into kde-baseapps 4.10? It will get tested more
thoroughly in RC2.
I'm very uneasy with merging something this big and intrusive
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Divendres, 21 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:27:17, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
Hello release team
As most of you must know for KDE 4.9, a new package nepmuk-core was
released, and with 4.10 we are now releasing
interface.
- Vishesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/#review16669
---
On July 27, 2012, 9:54 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105738/#review16520
---
On July 26, 2012, 5:25 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote
On July 28, 2012, 12:36 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
I have just been informed that the tarballs for nepomuk-core have already
been spun. Could we please please re-spin them, and include this patch. I
don't care about the rest. They are just bug fixes.
This one removes an entire
On July 28, 2012, 12:36 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
I have just been informed that the tarballs for nepomuk-core have already
been spun. Could we please please re-spin them, and include this patch. I
don't care about the rest. They are just bug fixes.
This one removes an entire
---
On July 28, 2012, 12:09 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105766
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105766/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
have already been
spun. Could we please please re-spin them, and include this patch. I don't care
about the rest. They are just bug fixes.
This one removes an entire class, and if KDE 4.9, goes out without this patch,
I can never remove it. Not until Frameworks.
- Vishesh Handa
On July 27
-core.
Diffs
-
nepomuk/core/resource.cpp eba3cea
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
-
includes/CMakeLists.txt 4ac2d7c
includes/Thing 952544e
libnepomukcore/CMakeLists.txt 066c898
libnepomukcore/resource/thing.h 2ae3d75
libnepomukcore/resource/thing.cpp 59f2a4d
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105755/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
/generic/runners/nepomuksearch/nepomuksearchrunner.cpp 0ea308d
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105738/diff/
Testing
---
Yup. Emails open up with KMail.
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
On July 25, 2012, 9:26 a.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
Well, this is very unfortuanate. It even makes me think whether we should
go back to the old version which returned QUrl::fromEncoded in every
function... I only introduced the global static for performance reasons.
Anyway, I am fine
. And the virtuoso team have notified us that they'll
be release 6.1.6 in a couple of days. We are in the process of testing it
out.
Thanks
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Please keep me cced.
Tirsdag den 17. juli 2012 20:38:25 Vishesh Handa skrev:
Please avoid using Virtuoso 6.1.5 with Nepomuk from kde 4.9.
Does that imply virtuoso 6.1.5 + KDE SC 4.8.x is a safe combo?
Yup that's fine.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Hey
that it becomes more
obvious.
- Vishesh Handa
On July 10, 2012, 3:57 p.m., David Faure wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105507
-
libnepomukcore/resource/nepomukmainmodel.cpp
a11faae9a6d42806ba884e74f07e2d0113c6910f
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105281/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105281/#review15161
---
On June 26, 2012, 9:06 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote
in the git repositories and
the beta2 release will contain these fixes.
Thanks
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
/6ec4e729e2426dac37e9e27932d4d9e579d53ba4
[3]
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/nepomuk-core/repository/revisions/b60025c6d5d6201b2bbe6881f11c431ec2671677
Eric
--
Eric Hameleers al...@slackware.com
Jabber: al...@jabber.xs4all.nl
--
Vishesh Handa
. by installing D-Bus introspection XML files, that should
be
fine.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
@Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still
as it is there in nepomuk-core.
If you have the time to port some of the stuff to Nepomuk2 it would be
nice, otherwise I'll take care of all of it tomorrow.
Good Night
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and
nepomuk-kde
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
* nepomuk
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk
mailto:nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org mailto:tr...@kde.org
. ( Yes, I'm an idiot!
)
Could you guys please repackage kde-runtime? I've just backported the
commits.
Sorry about the screw up.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
On 07/25/2011 10:26 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
Hey Release team
I'd posted on the list about 10 days ago about the need to backport a
lot of Nepomuk commits. One of which was extremely important and fixed
file indexing
to backport those changes as well?
I know I'm asking for a lot, but all of these changes qualify as bug fixes.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Since nobody has any objections. I'm going to backport all my changes
tomorrow.
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Vishesh Handa handa.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Sebastian
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Hi Vishesh,
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011
is not convenient, and slows down the entire system. Would it be
okay to backport those changes as well?
I know I'm asking for a lot, but all of these changes qualify as bug fixes.
--
Vishesh Handa
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
wrote:
Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vishesh Handa wrote:
I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO
0.7. If no one
objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.
I'm confused. What
are SDO 0.7 compatible. Has
anyone confirmed the opposite? If both are not 0.7 compatible then that has
to be fixed and nobody knows about it.
I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO 0.7. If
no one
objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.
Let me know
--
Vishesh
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Vishesh Handa wrote:
I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO 0.7.
If no one
objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.
I'm confused. What patch are you referring to that could
80 matches
Mail list logo
