Le Thursday 27 December 2012 16:16:55 Allen Winter a écrit :
> > We could get rid of the notion of Gwenview version numbers and just use
> > KDE SC version numbers, but I don't think this would work for example for
> > KMail.
> For the record, most kdepim apps use the same version number as KDE SC
On Friday, December 28, 2012 00:48:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > We can instead query the git repository directly for commit messages
> > containing '^BUG: ' or '^FIXED-IN:' (and its alternates) within the
> > commits
> > between the old and new version.
>
> Which means someone needs to do a lot
On Friday 28 December 2012 00.48.51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:27:25, Michael Pyne va escriure:
[...]
> > We can instead query the git repository directly for commit messages
> > containing '^BUG: ' or '^FIXED-IN:' (and its alternates) within the commits
On Thursday 27 December 2012 23:42:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:16:55, Allen Winter va escriure:
> > On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y
>
El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:27:25, Michael Pyne va escriure:
> On Thursday, December 27, 2012 23:42:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:16:55, Allen Winter va
escriure:
> > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >
On Thursday, December 27, 2012 23:42:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:16:55, Allen Winter va escriure:
> > On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y
El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:16:55, Allen Winter va escriure:
> On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y (meaning
> > KDE SC 4.9.5 ships Gwenview 2.9.5).
> >
> > Until now we hav
On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y (meaning KDE
> SC 4.9.5 ships Gwenview 2.9.5).
>
> Until now we have been using Gwenview version numbers for Bugzilla FIXED-IN
> fields but it has been brou
Hi,
Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y (meaning KDE
SC 4.9.5 ships Gwenview 2.9.5).
Until now we have been using Gwenview version numbers for Bugzilla FIXED-IN
fields but it has been brought to my attention that doing so means Gwenview
fixes do not get listed in t
On Friday 23 November 2007 14:34:06 Allen Winter wrote:
> Which brings up Dirk's (IIRC) idea of automatically assigning version
> numbers based on the KDE release number.
Sounds like a great idea to me for all apps where there is no active
maintainer.
--
Thomas Zander
pgphzZj3J2I70.pgp
Descri
On Friday 23 November 2007 13:03:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Divendres 23 Novembre 2007, Allen Winter va escriure:
> > Note to all:
> >
> > We need to remind authors/maintainers to increase the version numbers
> > on the applications before taggings.
>
> I nagged all kdegames maintainers, so y
A Divendres 23 Novembre 2007, Allen Winter va escriure:
> Note to all:
>
> We need to remind authors/maintainers to increase the version numbers
> on the applications before taggings.
I nagged all kdegames maintainers, so you can write check there.
>
> Which brings up Dirk's (IIRC) idea of automa
Note to all:
We need to remind authors/maintainers to increase the version numbers
on the applications before taggings.
Which brings up Dirk's (IIRC) idea of automatically assigning version numbers
based on the KDE release number.
Anyhow... something for the pre-tagging To-do List...
-Allen
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
