On Sunday, August 21, 2011 17:46:29 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
kdesrc-build was recommended again .. i took the time tonight (after a long
day in Taipei working on behalf of KDE) to examine it from scratch again.
first the good news: it took me less time to set up this time than in the
past, so
Like Aaron, I also have the greatest respect for the people doing the
migration, I migrated koffice and that took a lot of time and effort (not to
mention the many nights that test conversions were run on my only laptop with
enough space)
The emails were also not read by me to be an objection,
On Friday 19 August 2011, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
I'm looking to migrate kdeaccessibility this weekend also. It's mostly
ready, just polishing it a bit in svn first (making each application build
on its own or part of kdeaccessibility). I'll backport these changes to
the 4.7 branch when it's
On Sunday 21 August 2011 05:58:30 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 00:10:07 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Superbuild is unrelated and orthogonal to the code in kdeutils to
allow building as a single module.
yes, and that's the challenge here: it takes ~10 seconds to put a bunch of
A Diumenge, 21 d'agost de 2011, Nicolás Alvarez vàreu escriure:
On 8/21/11, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 00:10:07 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Superbuild is unrelated and orthogonal to the code in kdeutils to
allow building as a single module.
yes, and
On 08/21/2011 05:58 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 00:10:07 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Superbuild is unrelated and orthogonal to the code in kdeutils to
allow building as a single module.
yes, and that's the challenge here: it takes ~10 seconds to put a bunch of
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 17:29:22 you wrote:
Do you realize how few people workon doing the thankless and unsexy job of
making these moves happen(I'm not among them, so I'm not defending myself
here) and that itsucks when their motivation gets threatened further by this
kindof response?
i
Raphael Kubo da Costa kub...@gmail.com writes:
Hello there,
kdeutils is currently in the last stages of its migration to git: the
repositories have been created and I will do the initial pushes soon
(but probably not tomorrow, as I'll spend most of the day flying back to
Brazil).
The
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Thomas Zander wrote:
What do others think about a solution of that kind?
And is it applicable to our other (former) modules too?
There is a superbuild script; you can find details in kde-buildsystem
ML.
Superbuild is unrelated and orthogonal to the code in
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 00:10:07 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Superbuild is unrelated and orthogonal to the code in kdeutils to
allow building as a single module.
yes, and that's the challenge here: it takes ~10 seconds to put a bunch of
add_subdirectory calls into a CMakeLists.txt file. the
On 8/21/11, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 00:10:07 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Superbuild is unrelated and orthogonal to the code in kdeutils to
allow building as a single module.
yes, and that's the challenge here: it takes ~10 seconds to put a bunch of
On Thursday 18 August 2011 22.21.46 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Basically, the current CMakeLists.txt in svn can still be used, but aneven
smaller version which just does a series ofmacro_optional_add_subdirectory()
calls. Going back to Aaron'smessage, where should I put these instructions?
Thomas Zander wrote:
What do others think about a solution of that kind?
And is it applicable to our other (former) modules too?
There is a superbuild script; you can find details in kde-buildsystem ML.
--
Yury G. Kudryashov,
mailto: ur...@mccme.ru
I'm looking to migrate kdeaccessibility this weekend also. It's mostly
ready, just polishing it a bit in svn first (making each application build
on its own or part of kdeaccessibility). I'll backport these changes to the
4.7 branch when it's in git.
I'm wondering the same thing,
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 07:47:56 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 19:30:59 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
The applications are all going to have separate repositories, but there
are no dependencies between the applications (ie. there is
nolibkdeutils).
please
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
We also need this from the release team POV. So if you move, please
- don't do it too shortly before tagging a patchlevel release
I'm planning on doing it this weekend, which is a bit less than 2
weeks than the tagging of
16 matches
Mail list logo
