On Friday 05 September 2008 22:44:16 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2008 15:01:48 Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Friday 05 September 2008 05:59:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > > On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > > > I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kd
On Saturday 06 September 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Because KDAB does real development with real QA in the enterprise3
> > branch. And for the 3.5 branch people mostly just throw patches over the
> > wall and assume they work, with no testing at all.
> So having 3.5 branch and enterprise co
On Friday 05 September 2008 15:01:48 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2008 05:59:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > > I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kdepim
> > > enterprise. But the rest of the kdepim team will be moving
On Friday 05 September 2008 05:59:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
>
> > I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kdepim enterprise.
> > But the rest of the kdepim team will be moving onto KDE 4 and I plan
> > to tightly monitor the kdepim 3.5 b
On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kdepim enterprise.
> But the rest of the kdepim team will be moving onto KDE 4 and I plan
> to tightly monitor the kdepim 3.5 branch and stop anything but the most
> obvious bug fixes there.
>
>
A Dilluns 25 Agost 2008, Stephan Kulow va escriure:
> Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Allen Winter:
> > On Monday 25 August 2008 08:35:02 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > > Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > > while it might be "best" to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also
> > > >
Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Allen Winter:
> On Monday 25 August 2008 08:35:02 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > while it might be "best" to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also
> > > realistic that there will be those who remain interested in K
On Monday 25 August 2008 08:35:02 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> >
> > while it might be "best" to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also
> > realistic that there will be those who remain interested in KDE3 for
> > various reasons and there's no reason t
Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
>
> while it might be "best" to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also
> realistic that there will be those who remain interested in KDE3 for
> various reasons and there's no reason to try and control that beyond
> encouraging KDE4 to be the primar
On Monday 25 August 2008, Mark Constable wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:43:11 pm Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > Whats the underlying reason for pulling it into a git repository
> > instead of leaving it where it was the last few years?
>
> Because I believe HEAD should be a persistent stable rolling
> re
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:43:11 pm Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Whats the underlying reason for pulling it into a git repository
> instead of leaving it where it was the last few years?
Because I believe HEAD should be a persistent stable rolling
release URL (always summer in trunk principle) with experimen
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Mark Constable wrote:
> Once 3.5.10 is released I intend to pull a copy into a Git repo
> and offer public accounts to anyone who wants to keep tinkering
> with it
Whats the underlying reason for pulling it into a git repository instead of
leaving it where it was the
On jeudi 21 août 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2008 14:24:13 Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:45:33 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > > To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to
> > > fix two modules to even compile before I could t
On Thursday 21 August 2008 14:24:13 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:45:33 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to
> > fix two modules to even compile before I could tag it and I have _heavy_
> > doubts about the testing t
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:24:13 pm Allen Winter wrote:
> > To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to fix
> > two modules to even compile before I could tag it and I have _heavy_ doubts
> > about the testing that the branch sees. And the less it's used, the more
> > likel
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:45:33 Stephan Kulow wrote:
> To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to fix
> two modules to even compile before I could tag it and I have _heavy_ doubts
> about the testing that the branch sees. And the less it's used, the more
> likely
16 matches
Mail list logo
