Dependency Freeze Exception Request for KGet

2013-06-05 Thread David Narvaez
Hi, I would like to request an exception for the Dependency Freeze in the case of KGet to add a dependency on Nepomuk Core and Nepomuk Widgets. The situation is that KGet already provides Nepomuk integration, which provides features like auto tagging and download history. I worked on restoring

Re: kdenetwork Git migration

2013-06-05 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Urs Wolfer uwol...@kde.org writes: kdenetwork will get migrated to Git in the next days (between June 5th and June 11th). Please do not commit anything into SVN anymore. Also, please wait with any Git commits until further notice. Sorry if I've missed this being discussed somewhere else, but

Re: Dependency Freeze Exception Request for KGet

2013-06-05 Thread Allen Winter
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 07:03:09 PM David Narvaez wrote: Hi, I would like to request an exception for the Dependency Freeze in the case of KGet to add a dependency on Nepomuk Core and Nepomuk Widgets. Since other parts of KDE SC already required both of these afaik, I don't think this is a

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

2013-06-05 Thread Jeremy Whiting
Urs, I just ran a conversion, and cloned the result and found two problems. One is krfb git repo doesn't have kcm_krfb folder inside it. Looking at the CMakeLists.txt it's not built anyway, but we need to find out why it's not there at all imo. The second problem is that kppp has many

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

2013-06-05 Thread Jeremy Whiting
Hmm, actually looking deeper kcm_krfb in svn is an empty folder (not sure what it's for...) And the differences in kppp seem weird, http://paste.kde.org/759278/ but shouldn't affect anything from what I can see. so maybe we're good to go? should I push this into the main git repos and we can test

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

2013-06-05 Thread Urs Wolfer
Jeremy, I think you can push into the main repos. The kppp thing looks like some SVN keyword. I think this change doesn't hurt. Once you pushed into the main repos, you can can notify me again. Then I will test also and cherry-pick the build fixes into the 4.10 branch. @Pali: You can run the

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

2013-06-05 Thread Pali Rohár
Kopete git conversion scripts on dewey started. On Wednesday 05 June 2013 21:10:10 Urs Wolfer wrote: Jeremy, I think you can push into the main repos. The kppp thing looks like some SVN keyword. I think this change doesn't hurt. Once you pushed into the main repos, you can can notify me

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

2013-06-05 Thread Jeremy Whiting
Urs, Ok, kdenetwork-filesharing, kdenetwork-strigi-analyzers, kdnssd, kget, kppp, krdc and krfb pushed, tags pushed, hooks enabled, i18n branches set in projects.kde.org settings, and they are enabled for development. After kopete is migrated, will you replace the svn content with a README file