Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 15:36:10 Àlex Fiestas wrote: On Wednesday 30 April 2014 08:16:48 Scott Kitterman wrote: I get what you're asking for. What I'm trying to make clear is you aren't going to get it. Well, I'd say we try. Isn't there a chance Frameworks 5 WILL be quite relevant

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Harald Sitter
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Michael Pyne mp...@kde.org wrote: Also ideally, we should break with this tendency of upstream/downstream and you should become upstream, I would love to see opensuse (and others) keeping the release you picked maintained in a branch. I think this is wishful

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 1, 2014 4:06:07 AM EDT, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 30 April 2014 15:36:10 Àlex Fiestas wrote: On Wednesday 30 April 2014 08:16:48 Scott Kitterman wrote: I get what you're asking for. What I'm trying to make clear is you aren't going to get it.

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Harald Sitter wrote: On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Michael Pyne mp...@kde.org wrote: Also ideally, we should break with this tendency of upstream/downstream and you should become upstream, I would love to see opensuse (and others) keeping the release you picked maintained in a branch. I

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
I think this is so far the more insightful thing I have read so far. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 21:39:36 Alexander Neundorf wrote: Especially with all the KF5 bits is versioned bound to each others (so that to fix a bug in one component, you need to update *everything* - are you assuming that or is this indeed the case ? Do all frameworks depend on the

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Michael Pyne
On Thu, May 1, 2014 11:13:47 Harald Sitter wrote: On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Michael Pyne mp...@kde.org wrote: Also ideally, we should break with this tendency of upstream/downstream and you should become upstream, I would love to see opensuse (and others) keeping the release you

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

2014-05-01 Thread Michael Pyne
On Thu, May 1, 2014 21:20:06 Sune Vuorela wrote: On Wednesday 30 April 2014 21:39:36 Alexander Neundorf wrote: Especially with all the KF5 bits is versioned bound to each others (so that to fix a bug in one component, you need to update *everything* - are you assuming that or is