Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

2016-07-04 Thread Harald Sitter
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:29 PM, David Edmundson wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> >> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06:46 PM CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:45 PM, David Edmundson >> > >> >

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

2016-07-04 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Monday, July 4, 2016 1:59:41 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote: > I meant "if we accidentally released libkscreen 5.6" as "libkscreen 5.7 > beta", please tell me. > > We didn't. Ok, good. Thanks for checking! -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

2016-07-04 Thread David Edmundson
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Monday, July 4, 2016 1:29:55 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote: > > ... and if not, I need to know, because that means that > > > > - nobody tested the changes in libkscreen's master in the beta > > - the test reports that I

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

2016-07-04 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Monday, July 4, 2016 1:29:55 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote: > ... and if not, I need to know, because that means that > > - nobody tested the changes in libkscreen's master in the beta > - the test reports that I did get from the beta are meaningless (which could > be a good thing ;)) > >

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

2016-07-04 Thread David Edmundson
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06:46 PM CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:45 PM, David Edmundson > > > > wrote: > > > *sigh* seems so. Yet plasma-workspace is from the right

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

2016-07-04 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06:46 PM CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:45 PM, David Edmundson > > wrote: > > *sigh* seems so. Yet plasma-workspace is from the right branch and it's > > done by an automated script(!) > > Haven't we fixed that for