Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

On Mon, July 4, 2016 15:16:05 Harald Sitter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:29 PM, David Edmundson > > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > >> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06:46 PM CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > >> > On

Re: Review of special packager access

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Michael, > > On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please >> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a >> general point

Re: Review of special packager access

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a >> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as >> this contains

Re: Review of special packager access

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote: > Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> >> Hi all, >> >> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a >> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as >> this

Re: Review of special packager access

Hi Ben, On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote: > I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please > confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a > general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be > appreciated if folks could check over their

Re: Review of special packager access

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as this contains important details. First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to

Re: Review of special packager access

Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit : Hi all, My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as this contains important details. First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to

Re: Review of special packager access

Hi, On 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley wrote: - Arklinux has merged with OpenMandriva - safe to remove (but OpenMandriva needs access... Will talk to sysad...@kde.org) - Conectiva went down with the Mandriva bankruptcy, should be safe to remove - Mandriva doesn't exist anymore,

Review of special packager access

Hi all, My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as this contains important details. First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual

Re: Stopping release of kdewebdev for Applications 16.08

On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in years. > > They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need to keep > > it releasing. > >

Re: Stopping release of kdewebdev for Applications 16.08

On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any reason not to drop kdewebdev from upcoming 16.08 release? > It contains the following applications: > > kfilereplace > kimagemapeditor > klinkstatus > kommander > > None of them were ported yet, in fact they

Stopping release of kdewebdev for Applications 16.08

Hi, Is there any reason not to drop kdewebdev from upcoming 16.08 release? It contains the following applications: kfilereplace kimagemapeditor klinkstatus kommander None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in years. They should probably be converted to git, still, but