El dimecres, 27 de març del 2024, a les 9:23:54 (CEST), Plata va escriure: > Thanks for the feedback! > > > Generally, I think the reasoning makes sense. However, in the case of > Kalm, I don't think it's required. If you look at the app, it's pretty > simplistic (intentionally, due to its purpose). > > Therefore, I would prefer to just get it out to the public to eventually > get some feedback. I think it's pretty unlikely that anybody will notice > it if I just create a release myself.
The dependency freeze for KDE Gear 24.05 is this thursday, it would be good if we get some tie breaking comment here so far we have two votes (the person proposing it for yes "obvious, so only gets 0.5 value for yes") and (me voting 0.5 against). Cheers, Albert > > > El dilluns, 25 de març de 2024, a les 8:10:43 (CET), Plata va escriure: > >> Dear Release Team, > >> > >> > >> Kalm has spent some time in KDE Review (see > >> https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kalm/-/issues/2). Can we add it > >> to/release it in KDE Gear? > > > > As far as I understand Kalm has never been released, right? > > > > For new apps *personally* I always suggest to do a few releases on your > > own > > because it allows for much faster feature turn-around than KDE Gear that > > has a very strict 3 months for new features schedule, that is usually > > fine for "established" apps but for something new you may very well find > > that there's that obvious feature missing that everyone needs and now you > > can't add it until 3 months in the future. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> Plata > >> > >> P.S.: CC me on the answers, I'm not subscribed
