Requesting authorization to add one missing feature to Gwenview planned feature list

2008-04-23 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Hello, We are now in soft feature freeze, but I would like to be authorized to add one small feature to Gwenview planned feature list. The feature I want to add is a start page. I got this idea while working on Gwenview user research profile page on techbase. Since users usually store their

Getting distros to fix my lazyness

2009-03-05 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Hi, I just realized I forgot to bump Gwenview version number from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1 before KDE 4.2.1 got tagged (just fixed it for 4.2.2). I would like to suggest kde packagers to fix the version number in their 4.2.1 packages. What is the best way to communicate this to all (well, most) of

Re: Getting distros to fix my lazyness

2009-03-05 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Rex Dieter wrote: Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Hi, I just realized I forgot to bump Gwenview version number from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1 before KDE 4.2.1 got tagged (just fixed it for 4.2.2). I would like to suggest kde packagers to fix the version number in their 4.2.1 packages. What is the best way

Requesting freeze-exemption authorization for Gwenview

2009-05-06 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Hi, Attached patch adds support for XMP metadata to Gwenview. I would like to see it go into KDE 4.3. Since it takes advantage of the latest features from Exiv2, the patch is quite simple. It introduces only one new string: XMP, which I believe in fact should not be translated. Is it OK to

Include gwenview in 4.6.2

2011-03-21 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Hi, Following the mail Tom Albers sent to kde-graphics-devel ml, I'd like to see Gwenview included in 4.6.2. The repository is in kde:gwenview and the branch is KDE/4.6. Regarding the removal of project folders from svn, Albert and Pino had different positions on the way this should be

Re: Apologies for breaking the freeze and a suggestion

2012-07-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2012 11:23:28 Ben Cooksley a écrit : On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 06:32:04 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Hi, This morning I worked on two bug fixes for Gwenview which I pushed to the KDE/4.9 branch

Re: Release Team BoF Summary

2012-07-16 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le dimanche 15 juillet 2012 16:39:54 Michael Jansen a écrit : Let us postpone this until i have the script ready. I think the discussion is needed but currently a bit difficult because it is all really theoritcal now. It is all very theoritical because people took a simple and pragmatic

Re: 4.9.0 tarballs available (for packagers)

2012-07-31 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le lundi 30 juillet 2012 19:55:08 Albert Astals Cid a écrit : I agree the name is not the most optimal, but the code is correct #include locale.h has to include the locale.h of the local directory before looking for a system wide one The thing is: since the build dir is not the source dir,

Application version numbers, SC version numbers and FIXED-IN

2012-12-27 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Hi, Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y (meaning KDE SC 4.9.5 ships Gwenview 2.9.5). Until now we have been using Gwenview version numbers for Bugzilla FIXED-IN fields but it has been brought to my attention that doing so means Gwenview fixes do not get listed in

Re: Application version numbers, SC version numbers and FIXED-IN

2012-12-29 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le Thursday 27 December 2012 16:16:55 Allen Winter a écrit : We could get rid of the notion of Gwenview version numbers and just use KDE SC version numbers, but I don't think this would work for example for KMail. For the record, most kdepim apps use the same version number as KDE SC.

Re: Nepomuk - Changing the Resource class behaviour

2013-01-22 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le Tuesday 22 January 2013 10:05:07 Allen Winter a écrit : On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:45:03 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 09:32:56 Allen Winter wrote: : remove the API in 4.11 will that work? No, as far as I can see, it's kdelibs and we can't remove

Re: Changing the Nepomuk Tags icon in 4.10.1

2013-02-14 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Le Wednesday 06 February 2013 19:43:37 Vishesh Handa a écrit : Hey guys I recently rekindled my request to the kde-artists team[1] about a special tag icon for the nepomuk tags kioslave. Thomas was nice enough to point me to the feed-subscribe icon which looks so much better. Before -

Re: KDE SC 4.11.1 tarballs

2013-08-31 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Short version: I am very sorry to come up this late, I was on vacation and missed 4.11.1 freeze day: I would like to request reverting a kdelibs commit I made from the 4.11.1 kdelibs tarball. Long version: Shortly after KDE SC 4.11.0 got released I investigated Gwenview bug 322850:

Re: KDE SC 4.11.1 tarballs

2013-08-31 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
On Saturday 31 August 2013 11.20.30 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Short version: I am very sorry to come up this late, I was on vacation and missed 4.11.1 freeze day: I would like to request reverting a kdelibs commit I made from the 4.11.1 kdelibs tarball. Long version: Shortly after KDE SC

Re: KDE SC 4.11.1 tarballs

2013-08-31 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
El Dissabte, 31 d'agost de 2013, a les 11:20:30, Aurélien Gâteau va escriure: Short version: I am very sorry to come up this late, I was on vacation and missed 4.11.1 freeze day: I would like to request reverting a kdelibs commit I made from the 4.11.1 kdelibs tarball. Long version

[kdelibs/KDE/4.11] kdeui: Bring back KLinkItemSelectionModel: Synchronize currentIndex

2013-09-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
Git commit e1618e3abece58cd72537cc741fd827df2b52aba by Aurélien Gâteau. Committed on 11/09/2013 at 09:29. Pushed by gateau into branch 'KDE/4.11'. Bring back KLinkItemSelectionModel: Synchronize currentIndex The changes from this commit were initially committed to KDE/4.11

Re: Tests still failing in 4.13

2014-04-04 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014, at 16:42, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hello people, at the moment we have various 4.13 projects failing. Since we promised a while ago to not release without failing tests we have 10 days until tagging to fix the tests or we'll have to delay the release. If you need

Re: Tests still failing in 4.13

2014-04-04 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014, at 1:11, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2014, at 16:42, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hello people, at the moment we have various 4.13 projects failing. Since we promised a while ago to not release without failing tests we have 10 days until tagging to fix