Re: Restriction for moves from svn to git.

On Friday, April 22, 2011 05:36:49 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Tom Albers t...@kde.org writes: Dear Release Team, Since I'm less than impressed by some of the movements from svn to git [1], and considering we should not have to deal which such things during the final release

Re: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded

Where are the 4.6.3 tarballs hosted? I'd like to get a fix for the kdeedu build issues (I made them all build individually after they were migrated to git). Thanks, Jeremy On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Manuel Tortosa manutort...@gmail.comwrote: The KDEEdu tarball seems completelly borked:

Re: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded

(svn or git) or do you just want to hold on to it until 4.6.x is done. Are we going to ship kdeedu as one tarball forever? or will 4.7 be separate tarballs? thanks, Jeremy On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa kub...@gmail.comwrote: Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org writes

Re: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2011, Mark Davies wrote: on kubuntu which doesn't work since it seems to ship the old CMakeLists.txt from before but the cmake configuration has Couldn't see your log at that url but presume I'm

Re: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded

holding the release up for us to fix the git migration and create the tarball properly. Jeremy On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-05-2011 21:56, Jeremy Whiting wrote: Dirk, I got all

Re: git migration, next steps

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Eric Hameleers al...@slackware.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Jeremy Whiting wrote: Dirk, all, As you may or may not know kdeaccessibility and kdeutils are ready to migrate to git (when the freeze is over

Re: Fwd: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded

: On Friday 03 June 2011, Jeremy Whiting wrote: I believe you can tag it from git. Nicolas made each application buildable standalone or as a group. The only trick is that libkdeedu needs to be built first, but I believe he make some CMake argument you can pass to make them use relative paths

Re: Further git migrations (and splits)

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa kub...@gmail.comwrote: Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org writes: On Friday 17 June 2011, Nicolas Alvarez wrote: kdeutils is supposed to release with split tarballs (of course, the build system in 4.6 has been tweaked to also work as a

Re: Status of KDE 4.7.0?

Yep, that should be fixed with the commit I did 2 days ago. Jeremy On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: On 07/20/2011 04:15 PM, Dirk Mueller wrote: by schedule I should start tagging KDE 4.7.0 tomorrow. Does anybody know about show stoppers? this is

Re: KDE 4.7.0 tarballs (try#1) uploaded

Dirk, I just wanted to say thank you for all that you do in preparing the releases. You rock. BR, Jeremy On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org wrote: Hi, I just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7.0 tarballs. Those are the split tarballs that I mentioned

Re: Heads-up: kdeutils is moving to git

I'm looking to migrate kdeaccessibility this weekend also. It's mostly ready, just polishing it a bit in svn first (making each application build on its own or part of kdeaccessibility). I'll backport these changes to the 4.7 branch when it's in git. I'm wondering the same thing,

Re: git workflow draft

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: hi all so after the meeting on Sunday, here is where we are in terms of a draft workflow. more complete meeting minutes can be seen here: http://titanpad.com/SnJwFW2iXL the goal of the meeting was to come up

Re: git workflow draft

Ok it seems most people with a preference prefer KDE/X.Y over X.Y and for valid reasons 1) Other non-kde blessed branches can have obvious names. 2) Kdelibs, base, etc. are already KDE/X.Y 3) More modules are already KDE/X.Y than X.Y so less to fix when enforcing consistency. (after looking at

Re: git workflow draft

I forgot to mention some details about my proposal. See below. On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote: Ok it seems most people with a preference prefer KDE/X.Y over X.Y and for valid reasons 1) Other non-kde blessed branches can have obvious names. 2) Kdelibs

Re: KSecrets State?

It seems it has been moved to playground from kdelibs, but the application in kdeutils is still sitting there. Shouldn't that be moved to playground also until it works? Every time I build with kdesrc-build here I get ksecretsserviced which doesn't work, causing havoc with gnome-keyring which

Re: KSecrets State?

, Rex Dieter va escriure: On 07/10/2012 09:56 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote: It seems it has been moved to playground from kdelibs, but the application in kdeutils is still sitting there. Shouldn't that be moved to playground also until it works? yes, +1 If noone disagrees, I'll ask sysadmin

kdesdk migration

Hello release team guys, In preparing the kdesdk rules for migrating kdesdk from svn to git I'm wondering what the best time would be to migrate. I see 4.10 beta is to be tagged next week, would it be best to get the migration done before then? or wait until after 4.10 is finally released

Re: kdesdk migration

maintainers check the result then do the real migration this weekend if all is well probably. BR, Jeremy On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 10 de desembre de 2012, a les 13:28:45, Jeremy Whiting va escriure: Hello release team guys

Re: kdesdk migration

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org wrote: ** On , Jeremy Whiting wrote: Hello release team guys, In preparing the kdesdk rules for migrating kdesdk from svn to git I'm wondering what the best time would be to migrate. I see 4.10 beta is to be tagged next week

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

Urs, I just ran a conversion, and cloned the result and found two problems. One is krfb git repo doesn't have kcm_krfb folder inside it. Looking at the CMakeLists.txt it's not built anyway, but we need to find out why it's not there at all imo. The second problem is that kppp has many

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

there? Rerun the conversion if needed, etc. BR, Jeremy On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote: Urs, I just ran a conversion, and cloned the result and found two problems. One is krfb git repo doesn't have kcm_krfb folder inside it. Looking

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

now also. @all: Please do not commit anything which is not related to the conversion at this time! I have opened a sysadmin ticket for looking SVN repos until Git repos on projects.kde.org look okay and we can remove them in SVN. Bye urs On 2013-06-05 18:58, Jeremy Whiting

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

I just moved the kdeadmin and kdenetwork stuff from release-tools modules to modules.git on master branch, next need to do something similar for KDE/4.10 branch to package them in one tarball like I did in the past for kdesdk and kdetoys. Anyway, the list is : KDEAdmin {kuser,

Re: Dependency Freeze Exception Request for KGet

KGet has been moved to git now. kdenetwork in svn is locked also, awaiting kopete to migrate. KGet should be fine to work on now though in git. BR, Jeremy On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:36 PM, David Narvaez david.narv...@computer.orgwrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit

kdeadmin strigi analyzer

. Thoughts? thanks, Jeremy Whiting ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: kdeadmin strigi analyzer

Yes, I didn't mean to remove all of kdeadmin, just kdeadmin-strigi-analyzers which doesn't build and hasn't built for quite some time from what I can tell. Jeremy On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/6/7 Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org After just

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdenetwork Git migration

Urs, I think we are good to go now. I believe scripty got confused because there was still content in svn and git. Albert would know more though. And yeah, I think replacing only on trunk is enough iirc. BR, Jeremy On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Urs Wolfer uwol...@kde.org wrote: Kopete

Re: unifying libdiff2

Ok, added to module.git in master branch of release-tools. As for Messages.sh should it use kompare.pot still? or a new .pot file? BR, Jeremy On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dimecres, 24 de juliol de 2013, a les 16:24:40, Jeremy Whiting va escriure

Re: unifying libdiff2

Like this ? http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=libkomparediff2.gita=commith=e37e754e69abec2870dbe29c9a46b6f0d40f0fbe On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Burkhard Lück lu...@hube-lueck.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013, 21:06:04 schrieb Jeremy Whiting: Ok, added to module.git in master branch

Re: www/sites/www

Is there a manual step to merge this into http://www.kde.org/releaseschedule.ics ? thanks, Jeremy On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Kurt Hindenburg kurt.hindenb...@gmail.com wrote: SVN commit 1385056 by hindenburg: KDE SC 4.14 add release schedule in icalendar format. CCMAIL:

Re: Questions about KDE 4.14 and later + branches

Hello Christoph, I have the same question re kanagram. It already has a frameworks branch which builds and runs, and a soc student is working on fixes/improvements to master branch. but I wonder if I should ask him to switch his work to be based on kf5 and Qt5 or let him complete his project on

Re: The name of Applications 4.14 + 1

Albert, I have to admit when I first heard KDE Applications 14.12 it sounded strange to me. It is very similar on glance to 4.12. But the more I thought about it the more it grew on me, so I say +1 to the name. BR, Jeremy On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:

Fwd: kdeedu-data

-- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:31 AM Subject: kdeedu-data To: kde-packager kde-packa...@kde.org, KDE Edu kde-...@kde.org Hey packagers, A quick heads up about kdeedu-data strangeness. The upcoming KDE Applications

Re: kdeedu-data

Sorry, I guess I was unclear, kdeedu-data doesn't require any of frameworks at build time, only ecm and recent cmake. BR, Jeremy On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org Date: Thu

Re: Fwd: kdeedu-data

at what's needed in khangman itself to possibly do 1 above also by release, we'll see. thanks, Jeremy On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:08 PM, šumski hrvoje.sen...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday 23 of October 2014 16:33:48 Jeremy Whiting wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Whiting jpwhit

Re: Fwd: kdeedu-data

hrvoje.sen...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 26 of October 2014 22:53:57 Jeremy Whiting wrote: Sumski, Yes, you're correct, that is an issue. We are considering a couple of fixes for that as outlined below. 1. Merge khangman's frameworks branch to master, so it will be qt5/kf5 based

Re: Fwd: kdeedu-data

it to open them by filename. Crisis averted. thanks, Jeremy On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: On 10/26/2014 05:18 PM, Jeremy Whiting wrote: Ugh, I saw that on fedora recently. Why do distros do that? I guess those same distros also patch KStandardDirs to look

dolphin for 14.12 release

Hey Emmanuel, Looking at https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Application-release-status-December-2014#Applications_which_will_release_their_first_stable_Qt5.2BKF5-based_version_in_December_2014 it seems dolphin is still undecided, but the date has past for feature, string freeze. Please make

Re: dolphin for 14.12 release

Ok, perfect, I'll update the wiki. thanks, Jeremy On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: He did mail me privately one or two days ago. He says that it's going to be kdelibs4 based. Cheers, Albert El Dijous, 30 d'octubre de 2014, a les 10:20:05, Jeremy

Re: Apps 14.12 release aftermath / Running KF5 apps in KDE 4

Eike, Thanks for looking into this and notifying us also. I heard some vague reports but nothing concrete like this. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Eike Hein h...@kde.org wrote: Hi, it's becoming increasingly clear from feedback that we didn't think the decision to ship KF5 apps in 14.12

Re: KDE Applications 14.12.2 ready for packagers

That page is about the Applications/14.12 releases, they wont change from Qt4/kdelibs4 to Qt5/kf5 during the point releases no. Many more applications will be changing to kf5/Qt5 for the Applications/15.04 release though, yes. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Eric Hameleers al...@slackware.com

KDE Applications 15.04.1 tarballs are up for packagers

They are in stable/applications. Release is next Tues May 12 if all goes well. BR, Jeremy REVISIONS_AND_HASHES Description: Binary data ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Missing tag for Applications 15.04.2 ?

Doh, I forgot to push the tags. I'll fix that now. On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:05 PM, jb j...@kdenlive.org wrote: Hi, I just noticed - after a user request - that there seem to be no tag for the KDE 15.04.2 Applications release. Did I miss something or are the applications maintainers supposed

KDE Applications 15.04.2 tarballs are up for packagers

Hello packagers, Applications 15.04.2 tarballs are up under stable/applications/15.04.2 I'll try building them all this evening here, so they are untested as such. Let me know if you hit any issues with them also and I'll do likewise when I test them here. BR, Jeremy REVISIONS_AND_HASHES

Re: KDE Applications 15.04.2 tarballs are up for packagers

Fixed. Sorry if anyone was downloading. I've moved the files under their proper src folder now. BR, Jeremy On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote: Oops, my mistake. I'll fix that now. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Antonio Rojas aro...@archlinux.org wrote

Re: Applications 15.04.3 tarballs are up for packagers

, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote: Hello packagers, Applications 15.04.3 tarballs are up under stable/applications/15.04.3 I'll try building them all this evening here, so they are untested as such. Let me know if you hit any issues with them also and I'll do

Re: This is not working [for me]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dijous, 30 de juliol de 2015, a les 12:54:01, Jeremy Whiting va escriure: Albert, I've given this problem a bit of thought since you pasted your frustration to me the day 15.08 beta release started (and since

Re: This is not working [for me]

Albert, I've given this problem a bit of thought since you pasted your frustration to me the day 15.08 beta release started (and since the original e-mail here). I think fundamentally the problem is that there's nobody responsible for each module anymore. We have a list of Module Coordinators

Re: [Kde-pim] What's up with kdepim*?

PM, laurent Montel mon...@kde.org wrote: Le Monday 20 July 2015, 06:45:31 Jeremy Whiting a écrit : TLDR we can't release applications that depend on an unreleased framework... ? So we can release an application which depends on lib which is not released ? Framework is a synonym for library

Re: [Kde-pim] What's up with kdepim*?

idea as when would it then get moved to frameworks release cyle?) BR, Jeremy On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:19 PM, laurent Montel mon...@kde.org wrote: Le Monday 20 July 2015, 06:45:31 Jeremy Whiting a écrit : TLDR we can't release

Re: [Kde-pim] What's up with kdepim*?

TLDR we can't release applications that depend on an unreleased framework... On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 20 de juliol de 2015, a les 13:18:41, laurent Montel va escriure: Le Monday 20 July 2015, 10:38:39 laurent Montel a écrit : Le

Re: New release of Krusader

Extragear tarballs are usually created by scripts in the releaseme got repo. A quick look there I see the old script for crusader on the kdelibs4 branch. May need to bring it to master branch and give it a try. On Oct 8, 2015 11:16 AM, "Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN" wrote: > Hello,

Re: Review Request 125565: KMail: Fix scrolling up/down on the message viewer

to give the ship it though. - Jeremy Whiting On Oct. 8, 2015, 6:39 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Superkaramba

Hey all, I think we should kill superkaramba (move it to unmaintained) like I recently did with ktux and amor for the following reasons: 1. It's old mainly targeted KDE 3.x 2. It's unmaintained. 3. Plasma can do most/all of what it could do. 4. It's not been ported to Qt5/kf5. Any objections?

Re: [kde-community] KGpg

Which aspects of KGpg are nicer to use? Could those same changes come to Kleopatra possibly? or is this another Parley vs KWordquiz and we should do our best to keep both around? On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2015-08-30, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit

Re: KGpg

Correction, KGpg is maintained, Rolf made commits as late as last month. My mistake. I gave KGpg a try here and it does seem to work well. Rolf, could you use a hand porting it to Qt5/KF5 ? On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote: Hey all, I may have found

15.12 release schedule

Hey release team. I've created a proposed Applications 15.12 schedule here: https://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Applications/15.12_Release_Schedule . Take a look and let me know if it looks ok. It avoids christmas, new years, etc. But let me know if it's hitting any other holidays I don't have on

Re: Superkaramba

Ok requested it be moved to unmaintained. I'll remove it from the scripts for 15.12 once it has moved. Thanks, Jeremy On Aug 30, 2015 8:36 AM, "Raphael Kubo da Costa" <rak...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Jeremy Whiting <jpwhit...@kde.org> writes: > > > Hey a

Re: release notes link

Fixed. Maybe adding the link should be added to the todo list for frameworks releases? On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:15 AM, wrote: > Hi there :) > > The link to the release notes of 5.13 is missing here: > https://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Frameworks > > I suggest this

Re: kservice v5.14.1 release

David, Thanks for all the fixing. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:36 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2015 22:57:31 David Faure wrote: >> kservice v5.14.1 >> cb25732e88f43cea8ae6d852d165d1dac2844f74 >> 44fa7c3bd52470459cdc924b19393d6c39741c2749e87676126cb7071da9b203

Re: 15.12 release schedule

Ok, this seems to have no objections. I guess we should make it official and add it to the ical file? BR, Jeremy On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Jeremy Whiting <jpwhit...@kde.org> wrote: > Hey release team. > > I've created a proposed Applications 15.12 schedul

Re: How do we release dependent libraries for digiKam-5.0.0-beta1?

One other thing to note. All 5 of those libraries that are released with KDE Applications are kdelibs4/qt4 based on their master branches currently. To release them with KDE Applications 15.12 they need the frameworks branches merged to master branch. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Jeremy

Re: Minor typo in Applications 15.12 announcement

Fixed, thanks for pointing it out. On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > Hi, > > announce-applications-15.12.0.php:29: > > Addition");?> > > should be "Spectacular". > > Thanks for fixing this typo. > > Best regards, > Yuri >

Re: www/sites/www

Looks good to me. Nice work. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Friday 20 November 2015, a les 21:13:38, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: >> SVN commit 1444789 by aacid: >> >> KDE Applications 15.12 Beta >> >> CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org > > Some release

Re: KDE Applications 16.04 tentative schedule

Looks good to me. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > https://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Applications/16.04_Release_Schedule > > Discuss! > > Cheers, > Albert > ___ > release-team mailing list >

libkdeedu

I don't think we need to release libkdeedu anymore. It contains qt4/kdelibs based libraries that were used by applications that hadn't been ported yet. libkeduvocdocument was moved to libkeduvocdocument repo when it was ported to Qt5/KF5. All applications that use libkeduvocdocument have been

Re: libkdeedu

Works for me. On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > El dissabte, 19 de març de 2016, a les 10:57:28 CET, Jeremy Whiting va > escriure: >> I don't think we need to release libkdeedu anymore. It contains >> qt4/kdelibs based

Re: Applications release process FAQ

I like it. Nice work. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Sandro Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > As I went through the release process of Minuet, I had to poke Albert > with some questions. It's not that we have many new applications > showing up often, but maybe a FAQ could be

Re: Fwd: Could I make a tag for k3b kf5 branch?

Usually the person doing a release (you in this case, thanks for stepping up, we appreciate it) will create the tags. Usually tags are created from master branch though. I suggest first merging the kf5 branch to master (if it's ready) then announcing the merge on the i18n-doc mailing list so

Re: kde-baseapps

It's too late for Applications/16.08 yeah. Is this a port from Qt4 to Qt5? At any rate after Applications/16.08 has been branched master is open for changes (maybe that has already happened) so only need to update dependencies and let i18n-doc mailing list know that master branch is now qt5/kf5

Re: KDE Applications 16.12 release schedule proposal

+1 from me too. Sorry, been a bit busy lately :( You are awesome Albert. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> As usual noone seems to care enough to comment/+1/-1 so we'll just go with

Re: Gamepad KCM

On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 1:30 AM David Edmundson wrote: > b) merge it into the gamepad-kcm repo itself > > I would suggest doing this. It'll be easiest for future gamepad-kcm > devs to find than any other repo, and means it'll be obvious if it > ever becomes obsoleted. > Ok, I've copied it into

Gamepad KCM

Hello, For the past while Josh and I have spent some time working on a new gamepad kcm. It currently lives here [1] but we'd like to move it to plasma after a review period. It also uses an inkscape plugin to export parts of an svg file to svg images and a qml file for a given gamepad type. The