Sorry. typo in the original message subject.
This is about "Libical" not "Libcal"
On Tuesday, November 24, 2020 8:13:12 AM EST Allen Winter wrote:
> I plan to implement this new requirement 2 weeks from now.
> unless there are good reasons against.
>
> -Allen
&g
I plan to implement this new requirement 2 weeks from now.
unless there are good reasons against.
-Allen
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: KCalendarCore Require Libcal 3.0
Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 12:10:22 PM EST
From: Allen Winter
To: KDE release coordination
Release Team,
Unless there are objections, I'd like to require libical v3.0 in kcalendarcore.
libical v3.0.0 was released over 3 years ago (28 Oct 2017)
@Volker: you are the kcalendarcore maintainer. any objections?
Revert completed.
@Damien: yes please. add a conditional compile check for libical 3.0.5 (better
double-check that version)
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 4:26:38 AM EST Caliste Damien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le samedi 07 novembre 2020, Allen Winter a écrit :
> > > Allen, what's t
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:30:17 PM EST Christophe Giboudeaux wrote:
> On samedi 7 novembre 2020 21:42:11 CET David Faure wrote:
> > Dear packagers,
> >
> > KDE Frameworks 5.76.0 has been uploaded to the usual place.
> >
> > New frameworks: none this time.
> >
> > Public release next
FYI,
I released Libical 3.0.6 over the weekend.
This version has a fix to deal with https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385364
I think there was a similar bug but I can't find it now.
Howdy,
Libical 2.0 has been released since end of 2015.
I released Libical 3.0 in early 2018 and expect to release the 3rd bug fix
patch (v3.0.3) soon.
This is a formal request to increase the minimum required version by KCalCore
from 1.0 to 2.0.
Version 2.0 is less buggy and fully source
015 from what I can see.
>
> Regards,
> Volker
>
> > PS: please also inform distributi...@kde.org, if the switch has a fixed
> > date.
> > On Sonntag, 14. Januar 2018 15:59:46 CET Allen Winter wrote:
> > > I don't object to making KHolidays a framewor
I don't object to making KHolidays a framework.
I kinda object to the short timeline.
I wanted to finish up some BIC cleaning. No API changes planned at this time.
I'll try to hurry.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 4:20:38 AM EST Volker Krause wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 12:03:15 CET
On Tuesday, October 31, 2017 5:15:57 AM EDT Daniel Vrátil wrote:
> +1 - if it's broken and we can't afford to maintain it, we should drop it
> from
> releases rather than continue to embarass ourselves with broken software.
>
> If anyone wants, they can pick it up and take over maintaining it.
On Saturday, June 3, 2017 10:48:16 AM EDT Allen Winter wrote:
> I reported this 3 weeks ago. You don't have kwayland.
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D5828
>
This has been committed
6c03c15c08a4b585bc3f320865858e4c2832f70b
> On Saturday, June 3, 2017 10:41:16 AM EDT Antonio Rojas w
will this release build ok with Qt5.9.0?
and does it pass testing with Qt5.9.0?
On Saturday, June 3, 2017 7:33:35 AM EDT David Faure wrote:
> Dear packagers,
>
> KDE Frameworks 5.35.0 has been uploaded to the usual place.
>
> New frameworks: none this time.
>
> Public release next Saturday.
>
I reported this 3 weeks ago. You don't have kwayland.
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5828
On Saturday, June 3, 2017 10:41:16 AM EDT Antonio Rojas wrote:
> El Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:33:35 +0200, David Faure escribió:
>
> > Dear packagers,
> >
> > KDE Frameworks 5.35.0 has been uploaded to the usual
This is all my fault.
I committed twice into the master branch for fixes to holidays files:
88dcc058172f8f529a01d10593940de75f0b33c7 was for Hong Kong holidays
c88b89db49874407ba4b7cf0266208fb64cb6b33 was for Ukraine holidays.
all I wanted to do was get those commits into the Applications/16.12
On Monday, May 09, 2016 02:28:16 PM laurent Montel wrote:
> Le lundi 9 mai 2016, 10:59:24 CEST Harald Sitter a écrit :
> > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Allen Winter <win...@kde.org> wrote:
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > Unfortunately my commi
On Sunday, May 08, 2016 05:29:21 PM Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Unfortunately my commit b3a95ba0540e01a9bb10db53fc449cc49ce9a9e8 for
> the blowfish backend in kwallet broke things.
>
> See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362805
>
> A patch can be found attached
Howdy,
Unfortunately my commit b3a95ba0540e01a9bb10db53fc449cc49ce9a9e8 for
the blowfish backend in kwallet broke things.
See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362805
A patch can be found attached to that bug, or you can get commit
87e774825b779ba846315a8b2ffe6479dd9f9814
from frameworks
Howdy,
Please welcome Sandro Knauß as the new release dude for KDEPIM.
I already updated the coordinator list on the techbase wiki page.
I'll still be hanging around, trying to help out in my small way as I much as I
can.
-Allen
___
release-team
Congratulations!
Wish I had helped more than I did, but I've been watching and rooting for you
guys.
A big fan,
Allen
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 11:06:56 PM David Faure wrote:
As planned, here's KDE Frameworks 5.0.0.
I plan on releasing publically on Monday 7.
Let me know of any
On Friday, February 28, 2014 09:50:54 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi all,
Now that the 4.13 has been branched out, the master branch of KActivities
is for Qt5/KF5 development.
I have updated the branch name in kf5-frameworks-build-include (I guess
David had something else in mind, so I'm CC-ing
On Sunday, January 05, 2014 08:43:14 PM šumski wrote:
On Sunday 05 of January 2014 12:40:05 David Faure wrote:
...
You can find it in kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-kf5-qt5, attached here
for convenience.
Great, just a few questions ;-)
1) Is it expected that extra-cmake-modules and
On Monday, December 30, 2013 04:26:55 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, Mario and me have created a tentative schedule for 4.13
We both think that the 4 months schedule has worked pretty well so 4.13 is
basically 4.12 + 4 months but without .4 and .5 because they'd overlap with a
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:49:29 PM David Faure wrote:
We're almost ready to split up kdelibs into a bunch of separate git modules,
the upcoming frameworks in KF5.
One question that came up is where these modules should end up in the
projects.kde.org hierarchy.
Currently we have
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 08:19:48 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Please let's try to keep this discussion in release-team, I'm just CC'ing k-c-
d because Alex's discussion about changing the release happened there.
At the Release Team BoF at Akademy I was tasked to come up with a proposed
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 01:04:08 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
@people, please keep both lists on the loop.
One of the things we agreed we wanted for the 4.11 release was no failing
tests on jenkins.
We've almost achieved that.
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 07:03:09 PM David Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request an exception for the Dependency Freeze in the
case of KGet to add a dependency on Nepomuk Core and Nepomuk Widgets.
Since other parts of KDE SC already required both of these afaik,
I don't think this is a
Howdy,
libical 1.0 is out now and KDEPIM is recommending distros upgrade to this
version for 4.11.
libical 1.0 has a few bug fixes over the last version which is pretty old by
now.
(the last release was libical 0.48 in Dec 2011)
We are not *requiring* this new version. We are only
On Monday, May 27, 2013 09:49:09 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 28 de maig de 2013, a les 00:51:25, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 28 de maig de 2013, a les 00:20:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey
On Thursday, May 09, 2013 06:06:58 AM Johannes Huber wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013, 19:50:03 schrieb Allen Winter:
Packagers,
You might consider hot-patching your kdelibs with this.
The code that conceivably might display a user password has been in kdelibs
since 2009-07-08 Probably
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:14:01 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Ok, so the final schedule is here
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
It has the same dates as the one sent by Allen a few months ago with the
exception of the clarification that we'll release
On Wednesday 06 February 2013 07:43:37 PM Vishesh Handa wrote:
Hey guys
I recently rekindled my request to the kde-artists team[1] about a special
tag icon for the nepomuk tags kioslave. Thomas was nice enough to point me
to the feed-subscribe icon which looks so much better.
Before -
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:17:13 PM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 14.38.35 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 14:10:05 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
The sooner the better, but something for the release-team to answer. I
don't think it's that much of a
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:45:03 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 09:32:56 Allen Winter wrote:
: remove the API in 4.11
will that work?
No, as far as I can see, it's kdelibs and we can't remove API there.
Deprecate
it would be.
Ah. I thought
Howdy,
A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule
(created using toma's really useful releaseschedule program)
Please review and report back any obvious problems, for example
conflicts with conferences (i.e. Akademy).
On Friday 04 January 2013 01:04:38 AM Alex Merry wrote:
As far as I'm aware, apidocs are not translated. Does this mean that
they are not subject to the documentation freeze? I can't find any
clarification about this anywhere.
Consider apidox fixes the same as bug fixes.
They are not
Team hat.
- Allen Winter
On Jan. 3, 2013, 7:38 p.m., Christoph Cullmann wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108134
On Sunday 30 December 2012 01:18:06 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday, December 28, 2012 21:54:17 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Seriously. I know I'm probably just putting my foot in my mouth once more
here, but:
What are betas and rc's for, if not for stabilizing code and progressing to
On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Hi,
Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y (meaning KDE
SC 4.9.5 ships Gwenview 2.9.5).
Until now we have been using Gwenview version numbers for Bugzilla FIXED-IN
fields but it has been brought to
On Friday 14 December 2012 06:40:29 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, anyone against branching KDE/4.10 on Sunday?
This would be similar to what we did with 4.9, branch before the RC so the
RC's are already tagged from the new branches.
Fine with me. Good idea
On Friday 07 December 2012 09:24:34 AM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am , schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Thursday 06 December 2012 16.34.21 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2012 04:22:23 PM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2012 13.03.37 Allen Winter wrote:
On Sunday 02 December
On Friday 07 December 2012 03:43:01 PM Burkhard Lück wrote:
Am Freitag, 7. Dezember 2012, 09:07:24 schrieb Allen Winter:
We have a tool that Toma wrote for generating the schedule.
If someone remembers where that tool lives, we could modify it accordingly.
trunk/playground/utils
On Thursday 06 December 2012 04:22:23 PM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2012 13.03.37 Allen Winter wrote:
On Sunday 02 December 2012 01:31:48 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
On Sunday, December 02, 2012 16:00:33 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
A 4.9.5 is planned ?
I need to know
On Sunday 02 December 2012 01:31:48 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
On Sunday, December 02, 2012 16:00:33 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
A 4.9.5 is planned ?
I need to know for kdepim. I don’t know if I can push in 4.9 branch.
According to http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.9_Release_Schedule
Sounds like we need a new module for graphics libraries.
Along the lines of kdepimlibs, but for graphics
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:54:20 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
it seems like there are api-incompatible changes in libkdcraw-4.9.80
(compared to 4.9.x).
...
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 07:33:28 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 11:38:09, Allen Winter va escriure:
Sounds like we need a new module for graphics libraries.
Along the lines of kdepimlibs, but for graphics
Why? The people developing those
Jeroen,
This issue is popping-up again.
Any update?
On Thursday 19 July 2012 02:34:56 PM Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 07:15:10 PM Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Wondering if we should add a new bugzilla severity type called Feature.
Hi Allen,
sorry
On Wednesday 24 October 2012 06:47:55 PM Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 01:08:44 PM Allen Winter wrote:
Jeroen,
This issue is popping-up again.
Any update?
Pfew, I would love to just be able to make the changes as I see fit and
disclose the documentation
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:52:59 PM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:45:59 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 5 de setembre de 2012, a les 21:06:55, Martin Graesslin va
escriure:
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 22:41:10 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Hi KDE
On Sunday 19 August 2012 11:50:59 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Comments?
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.10_Release_Schedule
Looks fine to me.
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
For the record, I just created a request for this:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303794
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 08:34:43 AM Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday, July 13, 2012 05:22:06 PM todd rme wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote
A few things have changed with the kde-cvs-announce mailing list, fyi:
* I am now an administrator of this mailing list -- helping out mpyne
* I removed the default footer (which included info on how to unsubscribe)
* I added a new footer which says:
== This is a read-only list. Do not
On Friday, July 13, 2012 05:22:06 PM todd rme wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2012 19:15:10 Allen Winter wrote:
We would do away with the wiki-based feature plans currently on techbase:
replacing with a bugzilla query
Git commit 25a5934d5651f76e70796db4f223e46fc411ec47 by Allen Winter.
Committed on 13/07/2012 at 15:15.
Pushed by winterz into branch 'master'.
remove ksecrets as it is not part of kde sc 4.9 any longer
CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org
M +0-4kde-4.9.rc
http://commits.kde.org/release-buddy
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:23:28 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 06:32:04 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Hi,
This morning I worked on two bug fixes for Gwenview which I pushed to the
KDE/4.9 branch
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 08:43:12 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
== Note 2 ==
There is a suggestion that every feature commit should have an associated
bug number so it can be better tracked. Someone suggests trying with
frameworks when its more ready
I wonder if we could make special Big
Howdy,
Wondering if we should add a new bugzilla severity type called Feature.
This is something a product owner can add to a bugzilla issue. Users should
not be able to set this.
When users request new features -- we call those wishes. This new type will
be for features that
the development
On Monday, July 09, 2012 08:59:27 PM David Faure wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2012 20:09:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dissabte, 7 de juliol de 2012, a les 19:38:47, Allen Winter va
escriure:
Howdy,
Why not make the KDE/4.10 branch for kdelibs now?
That would make sense
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 06:32:04 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Hi,
This morning I worked on two bug fixes for Gwenview which I pushed to the
KDE/4.9 branch. Only later in the afternoon did I check email and realized I
should not have pushed those changes as we were freezing for RC2. I want to
On Saturday, July 07, 2012 12:06:12 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 18:07:47 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 01:00:11 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5 release.
Does anyone have suggestions
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 01:00:11 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5 release. Does
anyone have suggestions for a release plan?
I would like to do tagging either tomorrow morning or in the last July week,
as I'm on vacation in
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 11:56:05 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 27 de juny de 2012, a les 17:28:47, Allen Winter va escriure:
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 4:29:06 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote:
done.
On 06/25/2012 11:31 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi Sebastian, any chance
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 4:29:06 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote:
done.
On 06/25/2012 11:31 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi Sebastian, any chance to get final 2.8 soprano release soon?
Does it makes sense / would anyone object to making this version (2.8) the
required minimum
when building KDE
On Sunday 24 June 2012 11:09:09 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Anyone against creating the KDE/4.9 branch tomorrow night for all SC modules?
I'm for branching
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
Howdy,
In a few days we will be requiring v1.10.0 (or higher) of the
shared-desktop-ontologies package
for building kdepim-runtime master (effectively for KDE SC 4.9)
Probably your distro does not have this version yet, so you'll need to install
from source.
Get the tarball at
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 5:27:48 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 20 de juny de 2012, a les 12:19:51, Allen Winter va escriure:
Howdy,
In a few days we will be requiring v1.10.0 (or higher)
You mean 0.10.0, right?
Opps..
Yes 0.10.0
Albert
of the
shared-desktop
On Monday 11 June 2012 9:03:00 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote:
done
Where do I get it and what's the version number?
At soprano.sourceforge.net the download link wants to give me version 2.7.6,
from May
On 06/08/2012 12:55 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi Sebastian, can you please do a new soprano
On Saturday 09 June 2012 7:53:06 AM Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
- Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at least once.
Absolutely.
We are working on this. We have a CI system in place (build.kde.org)
and are just lacking the time and manpower to make it fully functional.
-
On Monday 28 May 2012 5:51:23 PM Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
We aren't planning to have a KDE SC 4.8.5 are we?
KDE SC 4.8.4 tagging is planned to happen this coming week.
And that will bring the 4.8 series to an end. Correct?
I'd like to send a kde-cvs-announce email either way,
so
Howdy,
Just read on kde-core-devel that Dan will be renaming his libkgoogle library to
libKGAPI
The code for this library will be available in KDE's Git repo. The repo is
already there as libkgoogle
but I don't know if Dan will also change the name of the repo.
The rename will affect
On Tuesday 29 May 2012 5:11:20 PM Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
For those distro's that already uploaded packages to their repo's, I suggest
that you add a patch that removes the 'beta 1' designation and just continue
to upload it as a trunk snapshot if you can not stop it anymore. I assume you
Howdy,
We aren't planning to have a KDE SC 4.8.5 are we?
KDE SC 4.8.4 tagging is planned to happen this coming week.
And that will bring the 4.8 series to an end. Correct?
I'd like to send a kde-cvs-announce email either way,
so please let's decide quickly.
Is anyone strongly in favor of KDE
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 1:28:04 PM Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
Hello Albert et al,
On 23.05.2012 18:58, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
The machine i'm generating the tarballs doesn't have pixz so i'll
use xz.
Even though it's somewhat coincidental ;): Thank you.
Personally, I think it would be
On Tuesday 22 May 2012 4:27:54 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure:
Hey,
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote:
I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE
4.9
On Tuesday 22 May 2012 5:36:54 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
S, now that I've bitten the bait and decided to package 4.9 beta 1 myself
I have a question :D
kdelibs is special since we don't have a master branch to package, i need to
package from the 4.8 branch, that's fine *but* the
.
Effectively I'm proposing to insert 1 extra month in the schedule.
Objections or comments?
So far I'm not having much luck finding time to work on release stuff
and I know that Torgny hasn't much time either.
On Thursday 17 May 2012 7:21:21 PM Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2012 6:35:18
Howdy,
kdewebdev has had zero love and attention for a long time now.
I don't think it was ever ported to KDE4/Qt4.
kdetoys is really small and hardly warrants its own module.
How about no longer releasing these as part of KDE SC?
___
release-team
On Thursday 17 May 2012 6:35:18 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Supposed to happen next thursday.
Do we have any plan?
I am working on stuff to make release tarballs -- planning to use CPack.
I doubt I'll be ready by next Thursday, however.
But possible.
Don't be surprised if we need to
, 2012 10:45:42 AM Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Coming in kdepim-runtime 4.9, we will now be providing a Google resource as
well as an overhauled Kolab resource that adds support for Kolab v3.
Both of these new resources are dependent on 3rdparty libraries, optionally.
So you must have
Howdy,
Coming in kdepim-runtime 4.9, we will now be providing a Google resource as
well as an
overhauled Kolab resource that adds support for Kolab v3.
Both of these new resources are dependent on 3rdparty libraries, optionally.
So you must have all the necessary dependencies available at build
Seems we have general agreement on this outline then.
Now let's review where we stand.
On Friday 27 April 2012 6:18:06 PM Allen Winter wrote:
1. the Continuous Integration (CI) System
- all the KDE SC modules are built continuously
So we have build.kde.org and a lot of modules are already
Howdy,
I started jotting down some thoughts about a brand new KDE SC Release Process at
http://techbase.kde.org/User:Winterz. For your convenience, a copy of that wiki
page is enclosed below.
Let's discuss what I wrote there.
After we reach some agreement, I will replace the current
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 1:48:45 PM you wrote:
Hi Allen,
I had the idea of using our jenkins installation for generating and test
building our release tarballs or a snapshot version of them.
Would this be a good idea or should I stop right now :) ?
I think this is a wonderful idea.
I
On Friday 30 March 2012 7:27:43 AM Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Well, the day had to come. I realize that my focus is meanwhile on many other
tasks, and I don't have enough time and attention to follow KDE 4.9.x
development.
Dirk, your work has been amazing over the years.
Thanks for all
Dirk,
Is it too late oto include this fix for kdepim-runtime in 4.8.2?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: kdepim-runtime bugfix for 4.8.2
Date: Friday 30 March 2012, 6:50:31 PM
From: David Jarvie djar...@kde.org
To: Allen Winter win...@kde.org
Hi Allen,
I've just fixed a crash
On Saturday 24 March 2012 8:16:28 PM David Faure wrote:
Hello release team,
How do we get kwebkitpart (separate git module) released together with the
rest of KDE SC (rather than on its own schedule as it was supposed to be,
in
extragear)?
Moving to kde-baseapps would do the job, but
On Monday 19 March 2012 4:30:52 PM Tom Albers wrote:
Dear release-team,
The sysadmin team is slowly planning to replace download.kde.org with a new
version. We are currently testing its replacement. The summary is that
nothing will change, but the question is when is a suitable time in
Howdy,
The version strings in the tarballs for kdepim and kdepim-runtime 4.8.1 still
say 4.8.0.
At the very least this is confusing us in the bug triaging.
I just committed fixes in the KDE/4.8 branches for
kdepim/CMakeLists.txt (commit 63467efd)
kdepim-runtime/CMakeLists.txt (commit 5c55de19)
On Monday 20 February 2012 1:13:25 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012, a les 09:07:28, Allen Winter va escriure:
Albert or Tom,
Could you create a release schedule for 4.9 using Tom's nifty program
and put it on our wiki for review?
http://techbase.kde.org
Albert or Tom,
Could you create a release schedule for 4.9 using Tom's nifty program
and put it on our wiki for review?
-Allen
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 5:03:57 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9?
Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around
Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months
cycle). Obviously this means that either:
Howdy,
KNotes is essentially deprecated now by KJots *
KNotes will not be ported to Akonadi and all future notes taking features
in the kdepim module will be done for KJots.
KNotes does not have a maintainer, nor has it had a maintainer in a long time.
So I propose moving KNotes into extragear
On Monday 06 February 2012 9:28:38 AM Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
KNotes is essentially deprecated now by KJots *
KNotes will not be ported to Akonadi and all future notes taking features
in the kdepim module will be done for KJots.
KNotes does not have a maintainer, nor has it had
A new Akonadi v1.7.0 is now available from your favorite KDE mirror in
/kde/stable/akonadi/src
This version (or higher) should be used for KDE SC 4.8.0
-Allen
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
On Thursday 19 January 2012 6:14:26 PM Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 4:56:10 PM Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 4:01:49 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I didn't even smoketest them yet, but I just finished generating and
uploading
the first
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 4:56:10 PM Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 4:01:49 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I didn't even smoketest them yet, but I just finished generating and
uploading
the first set of 4.8.0 tarballs.
Please report any blocker issues
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 4:01:49 PM Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I didn't even smoketest them yet, but I just finished generating and
uploading
the first set of 4.8.0 tarballs.
Please report any blocker issues or compilation issues either to kde-packager
or release-team
There is
Howdy,
The kdelibs-4.7 branch buildsystem is still setting the
GENERIC_LIB_VERSION, GENERIC_LIB_SOVERSION, etc
variables to 4.7
We need those variables to say 4.8
What are the plans for dealing with this?
___
release-team mailing list
On Thursday 01 December 2011 2:06:35 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 1 de desembre de 2011, a les 20:46:35, Shlomi Fish va escriure:
Hi all,
tags for recent releases of KDE (such as KDE-4.7.80) are absent in the git
repositories of kdelibs and kde-workspaces:
snip
On Friday 02 December 2011 5:15:10 AM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
Hi,
I just (too late for the tagging unfortunately) push a fix for leaking Bcc
content when sending mails to master and KDE/4.7 branches.
The fix is in commits:
master: 0875ca055322fd94962ed473be0a41854e17373a
KDE/4.7:
Pau,
As I understand it, the position of the Release Team is a rock hard, solid
freeze in kdelibs.
only bugfixes are allowed, period.
So this request will necessarily be denied.
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 5:15:41 AM Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From:
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
