Re: Status of libkface & libkgeomap
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2016, 09:49:53 CEST schrieb Andreas Sturmlechner: > On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 22:48, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Andreas, > > > > Same situation for libkgeomap. This library can be also moved to > > extragear-libs as only kphotoalbum use it. > > > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > Just bringing this up again before 16.12 freeze for consideration. I'm > obviously not the one to decide, and I'm not aware of the motivation behind > making it part of KDE Applications initially. > > libkgeomap recently got some commits, Those commits were done by me, but only to bring the code up-to-date with current Marble code. Those commits do not change the fact that there might be no maintainer and only kphotoalbum be using it. Cheers Friedrich
Re: Status of libkface
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 22:48, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Andreas, > > Same situation for libkgeomap. This library can be also moved to > extragear-libs as only kphotoalbum use it. > > Best > Gilles Caulier Just bringing this up again before 16.12 freeze for consideration. I'm obviously not the one to decide, and I'm not aware of the motivation behind making it part of KDE Applications initially. libkgeomap recently got some commits, but libkface remains now untouched for almost a year. Which is not bad per se, but the review to make it build with opencv-3.1 is still pending. Or should I just merge it now to give it some testing until 16.12.0 release? Regards, Andreas
Re: Status of libkface
Andreas, Same situation for libkgeomap. This library can be also moved to extragear-libs as only kphotoalbum use it. Best Gilles Caulier 2016-07-28 10:40 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier: > Hi, > > Not from digiKam team. As Kphotoalbum still use it, the better place will > be extragear as you propose. > > We currently study new algorithms and new codes with a student this > summer. New code will be completely different and will still in digiKam > core. > > Gilles Caulier > > 2016-07-27 22:00 GMT+02:00 Andreas Sturmlechner < > andreas.sturmlech...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> Obviously libkface is not a dependency of digikam anymore since porting to >> kf5, it looks like similar functionality is now bundled there. One of the >> last >> commits it received > 9 months ago was OpenCV3 support, which already >> needs >> downstream patching to build with OpenCV 3.1 (released in 2015-12-21). A >> review has been pending for some time: >> >> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126833/ >> >> Is it still being maintained? Right now kphotoalbum (kf5-port branch) >> depends >> on it. I wonder if it better be put in extragear at some point, though? >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >> >> ___ >> release-team mailing list >> release-team@kde.org >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team >> > > ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Status of libkface
Hi, Obviously libkface is not a dependency of digikam anymore since porting to kf5, it looks like similar functionality is now bundled there. One of the last commits it received > 9 months ago was OpenCV3 support, which already needs downstream patching to build with OpenCV 3.1 (released in 2015-12-21). A review has been pending for some time: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126833/ Is it still being maintained? Right now kphotoalbum (kf5-port branch) depends on it. I wonder if it better be put in extragear at some point, though? Regards, Andreas ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team