PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the Applications release. This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various products (all being PIM products) missing versions on

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, > doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the > Applications release. > > This causes issues - as we've received complaints

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: > It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, > doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the > Applications release. > > This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various >

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, >> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano > > wrote: > > On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Saturday, 17 September 2016 00:01:59 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Luigi Toscano >> >> wrote: >> > On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:55 AM, David Jarvie wrote: > > > On 16 September 2016 11:55:50 BST, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> >>> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread David Jarvie
On 16 September 2016 11:55:50 BST, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications >release, >> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the >>

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Saturday, 17 September 2016 00:01:59 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Luigi Toscano > > wrote: > > On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano > >> > >>

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Jonathan Riddell
> The problem here is to have an easy way to update the version data on > bugzilla. I think that this can be automated. Not trivial that due to bugzilla not having an API and the bugzilla Product names being unrelated to any git repository. The script I use for Plasma uses CURL and a local

Re: PIM: Version alignment

2016-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano >> >> wrote: >> > On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley